×

Salesforce contract design, joint pricing and production planning with asymmetric overconfidence sales agent. (English) Zbl 1364.90016

Summary: We study a supply chain in which a rational manufacturer relies on an overconfident sales agent to sell the products. The actual sales outcome is determined by the sales agent’s selling effort, the product price and a random market condition, and the sales agent is overconfident in their estimation of sales outcome. Apart from them, both of the sales agent’s degree of overconfidence and selling effort are his private information. We consider the salesforce incentive to motivate the sales agent and screen his real degree of overconfidence using a principle-agent method under dual information asymmetry, then the manufacturer uses the information to realize her joint decision on pricing and production. Furthermore, we derive the optimal compensation contract as well as the optimal pricing and production, and compare it to the symmetric overconfidence scenario. Finally, some interesting insights are found: when the manufacturer is uncertain about the sales agent’s the degree of overconfidence, her expected profit decreases while the sales agent with private information exerts less effort but obtains higher income, which implies the value of information; the manufacturer should hire a more overconfident sales agent, while a higher commission rate is not guaranteed. These results suggest that the manufacturer should not only focus on hiring the overconfident sales agent but also on disclosing the degree of overconfidence.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] A. Basu, Salesforce-compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective,, Marketing Science, 4, 267 (1985) · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.4.267
[2] E. Bendoly, Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations,, Production and Operations Management, 19, 434 (2010) · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01108.x
[3] L. W. Busenitz, Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making,, Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9 (1997)
[4] O. Caliskan-Demirag, Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand,, European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1321 (2010) · Zbl 1206.90007 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.017
[5] E. Cao, Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain,, Operations Research Letters, 41, 410 (2013) · Zbl 1286.90016 · doi:10.1016/j.orl.2013.04.013
[6] X. Chao, Dynamic inventory and pricing policy in a capacitated stochastic inventory system with fixed ordering cost,, Operations Research Letters, 40, 99 (2010) · Zbl 1242.90008 · doi:10.1016/j.orl.2011.12.002
[7] F. Chen, Salesforce incentives, market information and production/inventory planning,, Management Science, 51, 60 (2005) · Zbl 1232.90221 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0217
[8] Y. J. Chen, Should an OEM retain component procurement when the CM produces competing products,, Production and Operations Management, 21, 907 (2012) · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01325.x
[9] C. H. Chiu, Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price dependent demand,, Production and Operations Management, 20, 81 (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01159.x
[10] P. S. Chow, An experimental study on the effects of minimum profit share on supply chains with markdown contracts: risk and profit analysis,, Omega, 57, 85 (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.11.007
[11] A. T. Coughlan, <em>Salesforce Compensation: A Review of MS/OR Advances</em>,, In: Eliashberg (1993)
[12] T. H. Cui, Fairness and channel coordination,, Management Science, 53, 1303 (2007)
[13] Y. Dai, Salesforce contract design and inventory planning with asymmetric risk-averse sales agents,, Operations Research Letters, 41, 86 (2013) · Zbl 1266.90007 · doi:10.1016/j.orl.2012.11.010
[14] F. Englmaier, Optimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion,, Games and Economic Behavior, 69, 312 (2010) · Zbl 1230.91096 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.12.007
[15] B. Fernando, Free riding in a multi-channel supply chain,, Naval Research Logistics, 56, 745 (2009) · Zbl 1177.90034 · doi:10.1002/nav.20379
[16] D. Garcia, Overconfidence and market efficiency with heterogeneous agents,, Economic Theory, 30, 313 (2007) · Zbl 1109.91351 · doi:10.1007/s00199-005-0048-4
[17] J. Gonik, The salesmen’s bonuses to their forecasts,, Harvard Business Review, 56, 116 (1978)
[18] A. Hung, Information cascades: Replication and an extension to majority rule and conformity rewarding institutions,, American Economic Review, 91, 1508 (2001) · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1508
[19] T. H. Ho, Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design,, Historical Journal of Film Radio & Television, 23, 161 (2014)
[20] D. Kahneman, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,, Econometrica, 47, 263 (1979) · Zbl 0411.90012
[21] E. Katok, Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study,, Journal of Operations Management, 31, 129 (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.01.001
[22] M. Kaya, Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information,, Naval Research Logistics, 56, 669 (2009) · Zbl 1187.90057 · doi:10.1002/nav.20372
[23] K. L. Keiber, <em>Managerial Compensation Contracts and Overconfidence</em>,, Working paper (2002) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.302416
[24] L. C. Kung, Monitoring the market or the salesperson? The value of information in a multilayer supply chain,, Naval Research Logistics, 58, 743 (2011) · Zbl 1241.91054 · doi:10.1002/nav.20480
[25] C. Y. Lee, Compensation plan for competing salespersons under asymmetric information,, European Journal of Operational Research, 227, 570 (2013) · Zbl 1292.91105 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.007
[26] C. Y. Lee, Supply chain contracting with competing suppliers under asymmetric information,, IIE Transactions, 45, 25 (2013) · doi:10.1080/0740817X.2012.662308
[27] Y. Li, Advance selling decisions with overconfident consumers,, Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 12, 891 (2016) · Zbl 1331.90032 · doi:10.3934/jimo.2016.12.891
[28] B. Liu, Joint decision on production and pricing for online dual channel supply chain system,, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 4208 (2010) · Zbl 1201.90106 · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2010.04.018
[29] C. H. Loch, <em>Behavioral Operations Management</em>,, Hanover: Now Publishers Inc (2007) · doi:10.1561/0200000009
[30] S. Ludwig, Overconfidence can improve an agent’s relative and absolute performance in contests,, Economics Letters, 110, 193 (2011) · Zbl 1210.91067 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.040
[31] U. Malmendier, <em>CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment</em>,, Harvard University (2002)
[32] D. A. Moore, The trouble with overconfidence,, Psychological review, 115, 502 (2008) · doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
[33] S. Oh, Joint pricing and production decisions in an assemble-to-order system,, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 16, 529 (2014) · doi:10.1287/msom.2014.0492
[34] S. Oskamp, Overconfidence in case study judgment,, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261 (1965)
[35] O. Ozer, Supply chain sourcing under asymmetric information,, Production and Operations Management, 20, 92 (2011)
[36] S. Pal, Joint pricing and ordering policy for two echelon imperfect production inventory model with two cycles,, International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 229 (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.11.027
[37] V. Pavlov, <em>Fairness and Coordination Failures in Supply Chain Contracts</em>,, Working paper (2009) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2623821
[38] Y. Qin, Joint pricing and inventory control for fresh produce and foods with quality and physical quantity deteriorating simultaneously,, International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 42 (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.01.005
[39] L. E. De la Rosa, Overconfidence and moral hazard,, Games and Economic Behavior, 73, 429 (2011) · Zbl 1274.91279 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2011.04.001
[40] Y. Ren, Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study,, Management Science, 59, 2502 (2013) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1715
[41] J. E. Russo, Managing Overconfidence,, Sloan Management Review, 33, 7 (1992)
[42] S. Saghafian, The impact of operational decisions on the design of salesforce incentives,, Naval Research Logistics, 61, 320 (2014) · Zbl 1411.90192 · doi:10.1002/nav.21585
[43] A. Sandroni, Overconfidence and asymmetric information: The case of insurance,, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, 149 (2013)
[44] T. Steenburgh, Motivating salespeople: what really works,, Harvard Business Review, 90, 70 (2012)
[45] T. A. Taylor, Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects,, Management Science, 48, 992 (2002) · Zbl 1232.90198 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.8.992.168
[46] T. A. Taylor, Sale Timing in a supply chain: When to sell to the retailer,, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 8, 23 (2006) · doi:10.1287/msom.1050.0089
[47] H. Xu, Contracting with an urgent supplier under cost information asymmetry,, European Journal of Operational Research, 206, 374 (2010) · Zbl 1188.90135 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.012
[48] J. Wei, Pricing and collecting decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with symmetric and asymmetric information,, Computers & Operations Research, 54, 257 (2015) · Zbl 1348.90232 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.11.021
[49] P. Zhang, Designing contracts for a closed-loop supply chain under information asymmetry,, Operations Research Letters, 42, 150 (2014) · Zbl 1408.90047 · doi:10.1016/j.orl.2014.01.004
[50] A. A. Zoltners, Sales force effectiveness: A framework for researchers and practitioners,, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28, 115 (2008) · doi:10.2753/PSS0885-3134280201
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.