×

Contracting with an urgent supplier under cost information asymmetry. (English) Zbl 1188.90135

Summary: We investigate a contract setting problem faced by a manufacturer who can procure major modules from an overseas supplier, as well as a local supplier. The overseas supplier is prime and offers quality products, whereas the local supplier is viewed only as a backup, and its products are inferior in quality. As the local supplier needs to put in additional effort to fulfill the urgent orders, it is difficult for the manufacturer to estimate this urgent supplier’s production cost. This asymmetric cost information becomes an obstacle for the manufacturer in managing the urgent supplier. In this paper, we study two types of contingent contracts. One is the common price-only contract, and the other is a contract menu consisting of a transfer payment and a lead time quotation. We construct a Stackelberg game model and evaluate how the involvement of an urgent supplier with private cost information affects performances of the prime supplier and the manufacturer in different scenarios (with or without the urgent supplier, under different contingent contracts). We also conduct numerical experiments to show how the parameters of the contracts affect profits of the manufacturer.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory
91B44 Economics of information
91A80 Applications of game theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Barnes-Schuster, D.; Bassok, Y.; Anupindi, R., Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 4, 171-207 (2002)
[2] Cachon, G., Supply chain coordination with contracts, (de Kok, A. G.; Graves, S. C., Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 11 (2003), Elsevier: Elsevier Amsterdam), 229-339 · Zbl 1101.90311
[3] Cachon, G.; Lariviere, M., Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations, Management Science, 51, 30-44 (2005) · Zbl 1232.90173
[4] Cachon, G.; Zhang, F. Q., Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry, Management Science, 52, 881-896 (2006) · Zbl 1232.91277
[5] Chen, J.; Yao, D. D.; Zheng, S., Optimal replenishment and rework with multiple unreliable supply sources, Operations Research, 49, 430-443 (2001) · Zbl 1163.90454
[6] Chen, K. B.; Xiao, T. J., Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer, European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 225-234 (2009) · Zbl 1157.90438
[7] Chen, K. Y.; Kaya, M.; Özer, Ö., Dual sales channel management with service competition, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 10, 4, 654-675 (2008)
[8] Corbett, C.; Zhou, D.; Tang, C. S., Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry, Management Science, 50, 550-559 (2004) · Zbl 1232.90036
[9] Federgruen, A.; Nan, Yang, Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks, Operations Research, 56, 916-936 (2008) · Zbl 1167.90323
[10] Fu, Q.; Zhu, K., Endogenous information acquisition in supply chain management, European Journal of Operational Research (2009)
[11] Ha, A., Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and the cut-off level policy for buyer participation, Naval Research Logistics, 48, 41-64 (2001) · Zbl 0981.90036
[12] Ha, A.; Tong, S., Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition, Management Science, 54, 701-715 (2008) · Zbl 1232.90113
[13] Jaisingh, J.; Barron, J.; Mehta, S.; Chaturvedi, A., Privacy and pricing personal information, European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 857-870 (2008) · Zbl 1137.91389
[14] Lariviere, M.; Porteus, E., Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 3, 293-305 (2001)
[15] Lariviere, M. Inducing forecast revelation through restricted returns. Working paper, Northwestern University, 2002.; Lariviere, M. Inducing forecast revelation through restricted returns. Working paper, Northwestern University, 2002.
[16] Mas-Colell, A.; Green, J. R.; Whinston, M. D., Microeconomic Theory (1995), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York · Zbl 1256.91002
[17] Myerson, R. B., Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem, Econometrica, 47, 61-74 (1979) · Zbl 0399.90008
[18] Özer, O.; Wei, W., Strategic commitment for optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information, Management Science, 52, 1238-1257 (2006)
[19] Ross, S., The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem, American Economic Review, 63, 134-139 (1973)
[20] Sethi, S. P.; Yan, H.; Zhang, H., Inventory models with fixed cost, forecast updates and two delivery mode, Operations Research, 51, 321-328 (2003) · Zbl 1163.90348
[21] Sucky, E., A bargaining model with asymmetric information for a single supplier-single buyer problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 171, 516-535 (2006) · Zbl 1090.90070
[22] Tsay, A., Quantity-flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives, Management Science, 49, 1339-1358 (1999) · Zbl 1231.90065
[23] Wang, Jian-Cai; Lau, Hon-Shiang; Lau, Hing Ling, When should a manufacturer share truthful manufacturing cost information with a dominant retailer?, European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 266-286 (2009) · Zbl 1157.90582
[24] Yang, Z. B.; Aydm, G.; Babich, V.; Beil, D. R., Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option, Management Science, 55, 192-209 (2009) · Zbl 1232.90203
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.