×

Novel solution framework for inverse problem considering interval uncertainty. (English) Zbl 1534.74025

Summary: This article proposes a novel solution framework for the inverse problem considering interval uncertainty in structural or systemic responses, which provides an efficient tool for the uncertain inverse problems of nonlinear structures or systems. Interval is used to model and characterize the uncertainty, and the bounds of uncertain structural responses are only required. In each iterative step, the approximate deterministic inverse problem is constructed according to the interval analysis results, and then the identified intervals of inputs are updated by solving the approximate deterministic inverse problem. Therefore, the interval inverse problem is decoupled into a series of interval analyses and deterministic inverse problems that are alternately solved, which dramatically promotes the computational efficiency of the interval inverse problem. Besides, an iterative mechanism is proposed to ensure the convergence of the whole procedure. Finally, two numerical examples and an engineering application are investigated to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.
{© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

74G75 Inverse problems in equilibrium solid mechanics
74K99 Thin bodies, structures
74S99 Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] YehWWG. Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem. Vol 22. University of California Press; 1986:95‐108.
[2] TarantolaA. Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier; 1987. · Zbl 0875.65001
[3] VogelCR. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2002. · Zbl 1008.65103
[4] FaesM, MoensD. Recent trends in the modeling and quantification of non‐probabilistic uncertainty. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2020;27:633‐671.
[5] YangM, ZhangD, HanX. New efficient and robust method for structural reliability analysis and its application in reliability‐based design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;366:113018. · Zbl 1442.74158
[6] ZhangD, ZhangN, YeN, FangJ, HanX. Hybrid learning algorithm of radial basis function networks for reliability analysis. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2020;70:1‐14.
[7] ShinozukaM. Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics. Comput Struct. 1972;2:855‐874.
[8] XiaoN‐C, YuanK, ZhouC. Adaptive kriging‐based efficient reliability method for structural systems with multiple failure modes and mixed variables. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;359:112649. · Zbl 1441.74151
[9] NarayananVAB, ZabarasN. Stochastic inverse heat conduction using a spectral approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2004;60:1569‐1593. · Zbl 1098.80008
[10] Ben‐HaimE. Convex Models of Uncertainties in Applied Mechanics. Elsevier; 1990. · Zbl 0703.73100
[11] MooreRE. Interval Analysis. Prentice‐Hall; 1966. · Zbl 0176.13301
[12] QiuZ, ElishakoffI. Antioptimization of structures with large uncertain‐but‐non‐random parameters via interval analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1998;152:361‐372. · Zbl 0947.74046
[13] QiuZ. Comparison of static response of structures using convex models and interval analysis method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2003;56:1735‐1753. · Zbl 1068.74083
[14] TangJC, FuCM. A dimension‐reduction interval analysis method for uncertain problems. CMES‐Comput Model Eng Sci. 2017;113:239‐259.
[15] FaesM, BroggiM, PatelliE, et al. A multivariate interval approach for inverse uncertainty quantification with limited experimental data. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019;118:534‐548.
[16] FaesM, CerneelsJ, VandepitteD, MoensD. Identification and quantification of multivariate interval uncertainty in finite element models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;315:896‐920. · Zbl 1439.65162
[17] AhmariS, YangM. Impact location and load identification through inverse analysis with bounded uncertain measurements. Smart Mater Struct. 2013;22:085024.
[18] WangC, MatthiesHG. Novel interval theory‐based parameter identification method for engineering heat transfer systems with epistemic uncertainty. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2018;115:756‐770. · Zbl 07878402
[19] TangJ, CaoL, MiC, FuC, LiuQ. Interval assessments of identified parameters for uncertain structures. Eng Comput. 2021. doi:10.1007/s00366-021-01432-5
[20] JiangC, LiuGR, HanX. A novel method for uncertainty inverse problems and application to material characterization of composites. Exper Mech. 2008;48:539‐548.
[21] KhodaparastHH, MottersheadJE, BadcockKJ. Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the kriging predictor. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2011;25:1204‐1226.
[22] WangX, YangH, QiuZ. Interval analysis method for damage identification of structures. AIAA J. 2012;48:1108‐1116.
[23] WangXJ, YangC, QiuZP. Non‐probabilistic information fusion technique for structural damage identification based on measured dynamic data with uncertainty. Acta Mech Sin. 2013;29:202‐210. · Zbl 1345.74098
[24] LiuJ, HanX, JiangC, NingHM, BaiYC. Dynamic load identification for uncertain structures based on interval analysis and regularization method. Int J Comput Methods. 2011;08:667‐683. · Zbl 1245.74018
[25] XueY, YangH. A numerical method to estimate temperature intervals for transient convection-diffusion heat transfer problems. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2013;47:56‐61.
[26] YangH, LiY, XueY. Interval uncertainty analysis of elastic bimodular truss structures. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2015;23:1‐12.
[27] PadilKH, BakharyN, HaoH. The use of a non‐probabilistic artificial neural network to consider uncertainties in vibration‐based‐damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2016;83:194‐209.
[28] FengX, ZhuoK, WuJ, GodaraV, ZhangY. A new interval inverse analysis method and its application in vehicle suspension design. SAE Int J Mater Manuf. 2016;9:315‐320.
[29] KernickyT, WhelanM, RaufU, Al‐ShaerE. Structural identification using a nonlinear constraint satisfaction processor with interval arithmetic and contractor programming. Comput Struct. 2017;188:1‐16.
[30] DengZ, GuoZ. Interval identification of structural parameters using interval overlap ratio and Monte Carlo simulation. Adv Eng Softw. 2018;121:120‐130.
[31] LiuGR, HanX. Computational Inverse Techniques in Nondestructive Evaluation. CRC Press; 2003. · Zbl 1067.74002
[32] EnglHW, HankeM, NeubauerA. Regularization of Inverse Problems. Springer Science & Business Media; 1996. · Zbl 0859.65054
[33] GolubG, HansenP, O’LearyD. Tikhonov regularization and Total least squares. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl. 1999;21:185‐194. · Zbl 0945.65042
[34] DengZ, GuoZ, ZhangX. Interval model updating using perturbation method and radial basis function neural networks. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017;84:699‐716.
[35] JiangC, HanX, LuGY, LiuJ, ZhangZ, BaiYC. Correlation analysis of non‐probabilistic convex model and corresponding structural reliability technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2011;200:2528‐2546. · Zbl 1230.74240
[36] NiBY, JiangC, HanX. An improved multidimensional parallelepiped non‐probabilistic model for structural uncertainty analysis. App Math Model. 2016;40:4727‐4745. · Zbl 1459.74008
[37] StyanGPH. Hadamard products and multivariate statistical analysis. Linear Algebra Appl. 1973;6:217‐240. · Zbl 0255.15002
[38] FuCM, CaoLX, TangJC, LongXY. A subinterval decomposition analysis method for uncertain structures with large uncertainty parameters. Comput Struct. 2018;197:58‐69.
[39] SpellucciP. An SQP method for general nonlinear programs using only equality constrained subproblems. Math Program. 1998;82:413‐448. · Zbl 0930.90082
[40] GillP, MurrayW, SaundersM. SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large‐scale constrained optimization. SIAM Rev. 2005;47:99‐131. · Zbl 1210.90176
[41] TaneseR. Distributed Genetic Algorithms for Function Optimization. University of Michigan; 1989:164.
[42] WhitleyD. A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat Comput. 1994;4:65‐85.
[43] DuX. Inverse simulation under uncertainty by optimization. J Comput Inf Sci Eng. 2013;13:021005‐021008.
[44] LiF, YangJK. A study of head-brain injuries in car‐to‐pedestrian crashes with reconstructions using in‐depth accident data in China. Int J Crashworthiness. 2010;15:117‐124.
[45] ZhangX, HuZ, DuX. Probabilistic inverse simulation and its application in vehicle accident reconstruction. J Mech Des. 2013;135:121006‐121010.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.