×

Resilience of the quantum Rabi model in circuit QED. (English) Zbl 1370.81196

Summary: In circuit quantum electrodynamics (circuit QED), an artificial ‘circuit atom’ can couple to a quantized microwave radiation much stronger than its real atomic counterpart. The celebrated quantum Rabi model describes the simplest interaction of a two-level system with a single-mode boson field. When the coupling is large enough, the bare multilevel structure of a realistic circuit atom cannot be ignored even if the circuit is strongly anharmonic. We explored this situation theoretically for flux (fluxonium) and charge (Cooper pair box) type multi-level circuits tuned to their respective flux/charge degeneracy points. We identified which spectral features of the quantum Rabi model survive and which are renormalized for large coupling. Despite significant renormalization of the low-energy spectrum in the fluxonium case, the key quantum Rabi feature – nearly-degenerate vacuum consisting of an atomic state entangled with a multi-photon field – appears in both types of circuits when the coupling is sufficiently large. Like in the quantum Rabi model, for very large couplings the entanglement spectrum is dominated by only two, nearly equal eigenvalues, in spite of the fact that a large number of bare atomic states are actually involved in the atom-resonator ground state. We interpret the emergence of the two-fold degeneracy of the vacuum of both circuits as an environmental suppression of flux/charge tunneling due to their dressing by virtual low-/high-impedance photons in the resonator. For flux tunneling, the dressing is nothing else than the shunting of a Josephson atom with a large capacitance of the resonator. Suppression of charge tunneling is a manifestation of the dynamical Coulomb blockade of transport in tunnel junctions connected to resistive leads.

MSC:

81V10 Electromagnetic interaction; quantum electrodynamics
81P40 Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations
81V80 Quantum optics
82D20 Statistical mechanics of solids

References:

[1] Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Blais A, Frunzio L, Huang R S, Majer J, Kumar S, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2004 Nature431 162 · doi:10.1038/nature02851
[2] Schoelkopf R J and Girvin S M 2008 Nature451 664 · doi:10.1038/451664a
[3] Devoret M H and Schoelkopf R 2013 Science339 1169 · doi:10.1126/science.1231930
[4] Raimond J M, Brune M and Haroche S 2001 Rev. Mod. Phys.73 565 · Zbl 1205.81029 · doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.73.565
[5] Jaynes E T and Cummings F W 1963 Proc. IEEE51 89 · doi:10.1109/PROC.1963.1664
[6] Rabi I I 1936 Phys. Rev.49 324 · Zbl 0013.37401 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.49.324
[7] Rabi I I 1937 Phys. Rev.51 652 · Zbl 0017.23501 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.51.652
[8] Braak D 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett.107 100401 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.100401
[9] Ciuti C, Bastard G and Carusotto I 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 115303 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.115303
[10] Nataf P and Ciuti C 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett.104 023601 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.023601
[11] Casanova J, Romero G, Lizuain I, García-Ripoll J J and Solano E 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett.105 263603 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.263603
[12] Ashhab S and Nori F 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 042311 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.042311
[13] Baksic A and Ciuti C 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett.112 173601 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.173601
[14] Peropadre B, Zueco D, Porras D and García-Ripoll J J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett.111 243602 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.243602
[15] Hines A P, Dawson C M, McKenzie R H and Milburn G 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 022303 · Zbl 1227.81037 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022303
[16] Nataf P and Ciuti C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett.107 190402 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.190402
[17] Langford N K, Sagastizabal R, Kounalakis M, Dickel C, Bruno A, Luthi F, Thoen D J, Endo A and DiCarlo L 2016 arXiv:1610.10065
[18] Mezzacapo A, Las Heras U, Pedernales J S, DiCarlo L, Solano E and Lamata L 2014 Sci. Rep.4 7482 · doi:10.1038/srep07482
[19] Devoret M, Girvin S and Schoelkopf R 2007 Ann. Phys., Lpz.16 767 · Zbl 1132.82021 · doi:10.1002/andp.200710261
[20] Forn-Díaz P, Lisenfeld J, Marcos D, García-Ripoll J J, Solano E, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett.105 237001 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.237001
[21] Niemczyk T et al 2010 Nat. Phys.6 772 · doi:10.1038/nphys1730
[22] Yoshihara F, Fuse T, Ashhab S, Kakuyanagi K, Saito S and Semba K 2017 Nat. Phys.13 44-7 · doi:10.1038/nphys3906
[23] Nataf P and Ciuti C 2010 Nat. Commun.1 72 · doi:10.1038/ncomms1069
[24] Viehmann O, von Delft J and Marquardt F 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett.107 113602 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.113602
[25] Jaako T, Xiang Z L, Garcia-Ripoll J J and Rabl P 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 033850 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033850
[26] Bamba M, Inomata K and Nakamura Y 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett.117 173601 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.173601
[27] Malekakhlagh M and Türeci H E 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 012120 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012120
[28] Bourassa J, Gambetta J M, Abdumalikov A A, Astafiev O, Nakamura Y and Blais A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 032109 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032109
[29] Hopfield J J 1958 Phys. Rev.112 1555 · Zbl 0095.44801 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.112.1555
[30] Manucharyan V E, Koch J, Glazman L I and Devoret M H 2009 Science326 113 · doi:10.1126/science.1175552
[31] Nakamura Y, Pashkin Y A and Tsai J S 1999 Nature398 786 · doi:10.1038/19718
[32] Koch J, Manucharyan V, Devoret M and Glazman L 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett.103 217004 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.217004
[33] Koch J, Yu T M, Gambetta J, Houck A A, Schuster D I, Majer J, Blais A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042319 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319
[34] Clarke J, Cleland A, Devoret M H, Esteve D and Martinis J 1988 Science239 992 · doi:10.1126/science.239.4843.992
[35] Devoret M H, Esteve D, Grabert H, Ingold G L, Pothier H and Urbina C 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett.64 1824 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1824
[36] Devoret M H 1995 Les Houches, Session LXIII
[37] Anappara A A, De Liberato S, Tredicucci A, Ciuti C, Biasiol G, Sorba L and Beltram F 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 201303 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.201303
[38] Todorov Y, Andrews A M, Colombelli R, De Liberato S, Ciuti C, Klang P, Strasser G and Sirtori C 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett.105 196402 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.196402
[39] Manucharyan V E, Masluk N A, Kamal A, Koch J, Glazman L I and Devoret M H 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 024521 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.024521
[40] Bouchiat V, Vion D, Joyez P, Esteve D and Devoret M H 1998 Phys. Scr.1998 165 · doi:10.1238/Physica.Topical.076a00165
[41] Zhu G, Ferguson D G, Manucharyan V E and Koch J 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 024510 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.024510
[42] Grabert H and Devoret M H (ed) 1992 Single Charge Tunneling (New York: Plenum) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2166-9
[43] Li H and Haldane F D M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett.101 010504 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504
[44] Kou A, Smith W, Vool U, Brierley R, Meier H, Frunzio L, Girvin S, Glazman L and Devoret M 2016 arXiv:1610.01094
[45] Lolli J, Baksic A, Nagy D, Manucharyan V E and Ciuti C 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett.114 183601 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.183601
[46] Felicetti S, Douce T, Romero G, Milman P and Solano E 2015 Sci. Rep.5 11818 · doi:10.1038/srep11818
[47] Ciuti C and Carusotto I 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 033811 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.74.033811
[48] Liberato S D, Ciuti C and Carusotto I 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett.98 103602 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.103602
[49] De Liberato S, Gerace D, Carusotto I and Ciuti C 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 053810 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.053810
[50] Günter G et al 2009 Nature458 178 · doi:10.1038/nature07838
[51] Peropadre B, Forn-Díaz P, Solano E and García-Ripoll J J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett.105 023601 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.023601
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.