×

On the consistency among prior, posteriors, and information sets. (English) Zbl 07931349

Summary: This paper studies implications of the consistency conditions among prior, posteriors, and information sets on introspective properties of qualitative belief induced from information sets. The main result reformulates the consistency conditions as: (i) the information sets, without any assumption, almost surely form a partition; and (ii) the posterior at a state is equal to the Bayes conditional probability given the corresponding information set. The main implication of this result is to provide a tractable epistemic model which dispenses with the technical assumptions inherent in the standard epistemic model such as the countable number of information sets. Applications are agreement theorem, no-trade theorem, and the epistemic characterization of correlated equilibria. Implications are as follows. First, since qualitative belief reduces to fully introspective knowledge in the standard environment, a care must be taken when one studies non-veridical belief or non-introspective knowledge. Second, an information partition compatible with the consistency conditions is uniquely determined by the posteriors. Third, qualitative and probability-one beliefs satisfy truth axiom almost surely. The paper also sheds light on how the additivity of the posteriors yields negative introspective properties of beliefs.

MSC:

91-XX Game theory, economics, finance, and other social and behavioral sciences
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aumann, R.; Brandenburger, A., Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium, Econometrica, 63, 5, 1161-1180, 1995 · Zbl 0841.90125 · doi:10.2307/2171725
[2] Aumann, RJ, Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies, J. Math. Econ., 1, 67-96, 1974 · Zbl 0297.90106 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90037-8
[3] Aumann, RJ, Agreeing to disagree, Ann. Stat., 4, 6, 1236-1239, 1976 · Zbl 0379.62003 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176343654
[4] Aumann, RJ, Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality, Econometrica, 55, 1, 1-18, 1987 · Zbl 0633.90094 · doi:10.2307/1911154
[5] Aumann, RJ, Interactive epistemology I, Int. J. Game Theory, 28, 3, 263-300, 1999 · Zbl 0961.91040 · doi:10.1007/s001820050111
[6] Aumann, RJ, Interactive epistemology II, Int. J. Game Theory, 28, 3, 301-314, 1999 · Zbl 0961.91039 · doi:10.1007/s001820050112
[7] Bacharach, M., Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic model of knowledge, J. Econ. Theory, 37, 1, 167-190, 1985 · Zbl 0597.90003 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(85)90035-3
[8] Barelli, P., Consistency of beliefs and epistemic conditions for Nash and correlated equilibria, Games Econom. Behav., 67, 363-375, 2009 · Zbl 1180.91019 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.02.003
[9] Battigalli, P.; Bonanno, G., Recent results on belief, knowledge and the epistemic foundations of game theory, Res. Econ., 53, 2, 149-225, 1999 · doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0187
[10] Battigalli, P.; Siniscalchi, M., Hierarchies of conditional beliefs and interactive epistemology in dynamic games, J. Econ. Theory, 88, 1, 188-230, 1999 · Zbl 0972.91020 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1999.2555
[11] Battigalli, P.; Siniscalchi, M., Strong belief and forward induction reasoning, J. Econ. Theory, 106, 2, 356-391, 2002 · Zbl 1038.91013 · doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2942
[12] Bonanno, G., Information, knowledge and belief, Bull. Econ. Res., 54, 1, 47-67, 2002 · doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00139
[13] Bonanno, G.: A syntactic approach to rationality in games with ordinal payoffs. In: Bonanno, G., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M. (eds) Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 7), pp. 59-86. Amsterdam University Press (2008) · Zbl 1279.91034
[14] Bonanno, G.; Nehring, K., Assessing the truth axiom under incomplete information, Math. Soc. Sci., 36, 3-29, 1998 · Zbl 0957.03018 · doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00006-7
[15] Bonanno, G.; Nehring, K., How to make sense of the common prior assumption under incomplete information, Int. J. Game Theory, 28, 3, 409-434, 1999 · Zbl 1115.91307 · doi:10.1007/s001820050117
[16] Bonanno, G.; Tsakas, E., Common belief of weak-dominance rationality in strategic-form games: a qualitative analysis, Games Econom. Behav., 112, 231-241, 2018 · Zbl 1419.91125 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.09.003
[17] Brandenburger, A.; Dekel, E., Common knowledge with probability 1, J. Math. Econ., 16, 3, 237-245, 1987 · Zbl 0639.90110 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(87)90010-3
[18] Brandenburger, A.; Dekel, E.; Geanakoplos, J., Correlated equilibrium with generalized information structures, Games Econom. Behav., 4, 2, 182-201, 1992 · Zbl 0765.90091 · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(92)90014-J
[19] Chen, Y-C; Ely, JC; Luo, X., Note on unawareness: negative introspection versus AU introspection (and KU introspection), Int. J. Game Theory, 41, 2, 325-329, 2012 · Zbl 1274.91124 · doi:10.1007/s00182-011-0287-5
[20] Dekel, E., Gul, F.: Rationality and knowledge in game theory. In: Kreps, D. M., Wallis, K. F. (eds) Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Seventh World Congress. vol. 1, pp. 87-172. Cambridge University Press (1997)
[21] Dekel, E.; Lipman, BL; Rustichini, A., Standard state-space models preclude unawareness, Econometrica, 66, 1, 159-173, 1998 · Zbl 1035.91019 · doi:10.2307/2998545
[22] Di Tillio, A.; Halpern, J.; Samet, D., Conditional belief types, Games Econom. Behav., 87, 253-268, 2014 · Zbl 1302.91030 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2014.05.012
[23] Dubra, J.; Echenique, F., Information is not about measurability, Math. Soc. Sci., 47, 2, 177-185, 2004 · Zbl 1076.91024 · doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(03)00083-0
[24] Feinberg, Y., Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors, J. Econ. Theory, 91, 2, 127-179, 2000 · Zbl 0983.91033 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1999.2592
[25] Friedenberg, A.; Keisler, HJ, Iterated dominance revisited, Econ. Theory, 72, 377-421, 2021 · Zbl 1479.91054 · doi:10.1007/s00199-020-01275-z
[26] Fukuda, S., Epistemic foundations for set-algebraic representations of knowledge, J. Math. Econ., 84, 73-82, 2019 · Zbl 1427.91086 · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.07.001
[27] Fukuda, S., Formalizing common belief with no underlying assumption on individual beliefs, Games Econom. Behav., 121, 169-189, 2020 · Zbl 1437.91143 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2020.02.007
[28] Fukuda, S., Unawareness without AU introspection, J. Math. Econ., 94, 2021 · Zbl 1466.91220 · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.102456
[29] Fukuda, S., The existence of universal qualitative belief spaces, J. Econ. Theory, 216, 2024 · Zbl 1533.91076 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2023.105784
[30] Gaifman, H.: A theory of higher order probabilities. In: Skyrms B., Harper W. (eds) Causation, Chance, and Credence, pp. 191-219. Kluwer (1988)
[31] Geanakoplos, J., Game theory without partitions, and applications to speculation and consensus, B.E. J. Theor. Econ., 21.2, 361-394, 2021 · Zbl 1508.91142 · doi:10.1515/bejte-2019-0010
[32] Ghirardato, P., Coping with ignorance: unforeseen contingencies and non-additive uncertainty, Econ. Theor., 17, 2, 247-276, 2001 · Zbl 0980.91010 · doi:10.1007/PL00004108
[33] Golub, B., Morris, S.: Higher-order expectations (2017)
[34] Green, E.J.: Events concerning knowledge. (2012)
[35] Guarino, P.: The topology-free construction of the universal type structure for conditional probability systems. In: Lang, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (2017)
[36] Guarino, P.; Ziegler, G., Optimism and pessimism in strategic interactions under ignorance, Games Econom. Behav., 136, 559-585, 2022 · Zbl 1505.91101 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2022.10.012
[37] Halpern, JY, The relationship between knowledge, belief, and certainty, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 4, 3-4, 301-322, 1991 · Zbl 0865.03016 · doi:10.1007/BF01531062
[38] Harsanyi, JC, Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I-III, Manag. Sci., 14, 159-182, 1967 · Zbl 0207.51102 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.3.159
[39] Heifetz, A., The positive foundation of the common prior assumption, Games Econom. Behav., 56, 1, 105-120, 2006 · Zbl 1150.91006 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.06.002
[40] Heifetz, A.; Meier, M.; Schipper, BC, Unawareness, beliefs, and speculative trade, Games Econom. Behav., 77, 1, 100-121, 2013 · Zbl 1274.91348 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.09.003
[41] Hellman, Z., Iterated expectations, compact spaces, and common priors, Games Econom. Behav., 72, 1, 163-171, 2011 · Zbl 1236.91033 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2010.06.012
[42] Hérves-Beloso, C.; Monteiro, PK, Information and \(\sigma \)-algebras, Econ. Theor., 54, 2, 405-418, 2013 · Zbl 1367.91102 · doi:10.1007/s00199-012-0723-1
[43] Hillas, J.; Samet, D., Dominance rationality: a unified approach, Games Econom. Behav., 119, 189-196, 2020 · Zbl 1431.91054 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.11.001
[44] Hintikka, J., Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, 1962, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Ithaca
[45] Hoffmann-Jørgensen, J., Probability with a View toward Statistics, 1994, London: Chapman & Hall, London · Zbl 0821.62003 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3019-4
[46] Kajii, A.; Morris, S., Common \(p\)-belief: the general case, Games Econom. Behav., 18, 1, 73-82, 1997 · Zbl 0893.90034 · doi:10.1006/game.1997.0513
[47] Kajii, A.; Morris, S., The robustness of equilibria to incomplete information, Econometrica, 65, 6, 1283-1309, 1997 · Zbl 0887.90186 · doi:10.2307/2171737
[48] Koutsougeras, L.C., Yannelis, N.C.: A note on information, trade and common knowledge. In: Nishimura, K. (eds) pp. 403-409. Springer (2017)
[49] Kovach, M.: Ambiguity and partial bayesian updating. Econ. Theory (2023). doi:10.1007/s00199-023-01528-7
[50] Lee, JJ, Formalization of Information: knowledge and belief, Econ. Theory, 66, 4, 1007-1022, 2018 · Zbl 1422.91199 · doi:10.1007/s00199-017-1078-4
[51] Lenzen, W., Recent Work in Epistemic Logic, Acta Philos. Fenn., 30, 2, 1-219, 1978 · Zbl 0397.03002
[52] Lipman, BL, Information processing and bounded rationality: a survey, Can. J. Econ., 28, 1, 42-67, 1995 · doi:10.2307/136022
[53] Maus, S., Balancedness and the core in economies with asymmetric information, Econ. Theory, 22, 613-627, 2003 · Zbl 1071.91503 · doi:10.1007/s00199-002-0343-2
[54] Meier, M., Universal knowledge-belief structures, Games Econ. Behav., 62, 1, 53-66, 2008 · Zbl 1135.91338 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2007.03.001
[55] Mertens, JF; Zamir, S., Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information, Int. J. Game Theory, 14, 1, 1-29, 1985 · Zbl 0567.90103 · doi:10.1007/BF01770224
[56] Milgrom, P.; Stokey, N., Information, trade and common knowledge, J. Econ. Theory, 26, 1, 17-27, 1982 · Zbl 0485.90018 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(82)90046-1
[57] Modica, S.; Rustichini, A., Awareness and partitional information structures, Theory Decis., 37, 1, 107-124, 1994 · Zbl 0822.92028 · doi:10.1007/BF01079207
[58] Modica, S.; Rustichini, A., Unawareness and partitional information structures, Games Econ. Behav., 27, 2, 265-298, 1999 · Zbl 0943.91026 · doi:10.1006/game.1998.0666
[59] Monderer, D.; Samet, D., Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs, Games Econ. Behav., 1, 2, 170-190, 1989 · Zbl 0755.90110 · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(89)90017-1
[60] Morris, S., Trade with heterogeneous prior beliefs and asymmetric information, Econometrica, 62, 6, 1327-1347, 1994 · Zbl 0816.90024 · doi:10.2307/2951751
[61] Morris, S., The logic of belief and belief change: a decision theoretic approach, J. Econ. Theory, 69, 1, 1-23, 1996 · Zbl 0852.90004 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.0035
[62] Morris, S., Rob, R., Shin, H.S.: \(p\)-Dominance and belief potential. Econometrica (1995)
[63] Mukerji, S., Understanding the nonadditive probability decision model, Econ. Theory, 9, 1, 23-46, 1997 · Zbl 0866.90005 · doi:10.1007/BF01213441
[64] Neeman, Z., Approximating agreeing to disagree results with common \(p\)-beliefs, Games Econ. Behav., 12, 1, 162-164, 1996 · Zbl 0844.90004 · doi:10.1006/game.1996.0011
[65] Neeman, Z., Common beliefs and the existence of speculative trade, Games Econ. Behav., 16, 77-96, 1996 · Zbl 0864.90028 · doi:10.1006/game.1996.0075
[66] Nehring, K., Common priors under incomplete information: a unification, Econ. Theor., 18, 3, 535-553, 2001 · Zbl 0989.91067 · doi:10.1007/PL00004199
[67] Rubinstein, A., The electronic mail game: strategic behavior under “almost common knowledge”, Am. Econ. Rev., 79, 3, 385-391, 1989
[68] Samet, D., Ignoring ignorance and agreeing to disagree, J. Econ. Theory, 52, 1, 190-207, 1990 · Zbl 0719.90022 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(90)90074-T
[69] Samet, D., Agreeing to disagree in infinite information structures, Int. J. Game Theory, 21, 2, 213-218, 1992 · Zbl 0758.90085 · doi:10.1007/BF01245462
[70] Samet, D., Iterated expectations and common priors, Games Econ. Behav., 24, 1-2, 131-141, 1998 · Zbl 0910.90285 · doi:10.1006/game.1997.0616
[71] Samet, D., Bayesianism without learning, Res. Econ., 53, 2, 227-242, 1999 · doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0186
[72] Samet, D., Quantified beliefs and believed quantities, J. Econ. Theory, 95, 169-185, 2000 · Zbl 0967.91079 · doi:10.1006/jeth.2000.2670
[73] Samet, D., Common belief of rationality in games with perfect information, Games Econ. Behav., 79, 192-200, 2013 · Zbl 1281.91036 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.01.008
[74] Shin, HS, Logical structure of common knowledge, J. Econ. Theory, 60, 1, 1-13, 1993 · Zbl 0772.90036 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1032
[75] Sonsino, D., “Impossibility of speculation” theorem with noisy information, Games Econ. Behav., 8, 406-423, 1995 · Zbl 0822.90038 · doi:10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80009-0
[76] Stalnaker, R., On the evaluation of solution concepts, Theory Decis., 37, 1, 49-73, 1994 · Zbl 0805.90150 · doi:10.1007/BF01079205
[77] Tan, TC-C; Werlang, SRdC, The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games, J. Econ. Theory, 45.2, 370-391, 1988 · Zbl 0653.90098 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(88)90276-1
[78] Tóbiás, A., A unified epistemological theory of information processing, Theory Decis., 90, 63-83, 2021 · Zbl 1461.91104 · doi:10.1007/s11238-020-09769-x
[79] Tsakas, E.: “Agreeing to disagree with conditional probability systems”. B.E. J. Theor. Econ. 18(2) (2018) · Zbl 1508.91160
[80] Vassilakis, S.; Zamir, S., Common belief and common knowledge, J. Math. Econ., 22, 5, 495-505, 1993 · Zbl 0794.90010 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(93)90039-N
[81] Weinstein, J.; Yildiz, M., Impact of higher-order uncertainty, Games Econ. Behav., 60, 200-212, 2007 · Zbl 1155.91306 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2006.10.002
[82] Yannelis, NC, The core of an economy with differential information, Econ. Theory, 1, 183-198, 1991 · Zbl 0810.90013 · doi:10.1007/BF01211533
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.