×

Identification-robust nonparametric inference in a linear IV model. (English) Zbl 07693695

Summary: For a linear IV regression, we propose two new inference procedures on parameters of endogenous variables that are robust to any identification pattern, do not rely on a linear first-stage equation, and account for heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Building on [H. J. Bierens, J. Econom. 20, 105–134 (1982; Zbl 0549.62076)], we first propose an Integrated Conditional Moment (ICM) type statistic constructed by setting the parameters to the value under the null hypothesis. The ICM procedure tests at the same time the value of the coefficient and the specification of the model. We then adopt a conditionality principle to condition on a set of ICM statistics that informs on identification strength. Our two procedures uniformly control size irrespective of identification strength. They are powerful irrespective of the nonlinear form of the link between instruments and endogenous variables and are competitive with existing procedures in simulations and application.

MSC:

62-XX Statistics
91-XX Game theory, economics, finance, and other social and behavioral sciences

Citations:

Zbl 0549.62076

Software:

gamair
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abadie, A.; Gu, J.; Shen, S., Instrumental Variable Estimation with First Stage HeterogeneityWorking paper (2016), MIT
[2] Anderson, T. W.; Rubin, H., Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations, Ann. Math. Statist., 20, 1, 46-63 (1949) · Zbl 0033.08002
[3] Andrews, D. W.K., Empirical process methods in econometrics, (Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4 (1994), Elsevier), 2247-2294
[4] Andrews, D. W.K., Nonparametric kernel estimation for semiparametric models, Econom. Theory, 11, 03, 560 (1995)
[5] Andrews, I., Conditional linear combination tests for weakly identified models, Econometrica, 84, 6, 2155-2182 (2016) · Zbl 1410.62193
[6] Andrews, D. W.K.; Cheng, X., Estimation and inference with weak, semi-strong, and strong identification, Econometrica, 80, 5, 2153-2211 (2012) · Zbl 1274.62160
[7] Andrews, D. W.K.; Guggenberger, P., Identification and singularity-robust inference for moment condition models, Quant. Econ., 10, 4, 1703-1746 (2019) · Zbl 1453.62462
[8] Andrews, D. W.K.; Marmer, V.; Yu, Z., On optimal inference in the linear IV model, Quant. Econ., 10, 2, 457-485 (2019) · Zbl 1434.62160
[9] Andrews, I.; Mikusheva, A., Conditional inference with a functional nuisance parameter, Econometrica, 84, 4, 1571-1612 (2016) · Zbl 1410.62054
[10] Andrews, I.; Mikusheva, A., A geometric approach to nonlinear econometric models, Econometrica, 84, 3, 1249-1264 (2016) · Zbl 1410.62194
[11] Andrews, D. W.K.; Moreira, M. J.; Stock, J. H., Optimal two-sided invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression, Econometrica, 74, 3, 715-752 (2006) · Zbl 1128.62022
[12] Andrews, D. W.K.; Stock, J. H., Inference with weak instruments, (Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Theory and Applications: Ninth World Congress of the Econometric Society. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Theory and Applications: Ninth World Congress of the Econometric Society, Econometric Society Monograph Series, vol. 3 (2007), Cambridge University Press) · Zbl 1131.62105
[13] Antoine, B.; Lavergne, P., Conditional moment models under semi-strong identification, J. Econometrics, 182, 3, 59-69 (2014) · Zbl 1311.62079
[14] Bierens, H., Consistent model specification tests, J. Econometrics, 20, 105-134 (1982) · Zbl 0549.62076
[15] Bierens, H. J., A consistent conditional moment test of functional form, Econometrica, 58, 6, 1443-1458 (1990) · Zbl 0737.62058
[16] Bierens, H. J.; Ploberger, W., Asymptotic theory of integrated conditional moment tests, Econometrica, 65, 5, 1129-1151 (1997) · Zbl 0927.62085
[17] Burbage, J. B.; Magee, L.; Robb, A. L., Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 401, 123-127 (1988)
[18] Cattaneo, M. D.; Farrell, M. H., Optimal convergence rates, Bahadur representation, and asymptotic normality of partitioning estimators, J. Econometrics, 174, 2, 127-143 (2013) · Zbl 1283.62060
[19] Chen, X.; Lee, S.; Seo, M. H., Powerful Inference (2021), arXiv:2008.11140 [econ, math, stat]
[20] Chernozhukov, V.; Hansen, C., The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with weak instruments, Econom. Lett., 100, 1, 68-71 (2008)
[21] Chernozhukov, V.; Hansen, C.; Jansson, M., Admissible invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression, Econom. Theory, 25, 03, 806 (2009) · Zbl 1278.62029
[22] de Wet, T.; Venter, J. H., Asymptotic distributions for quadratic forms with applications to tests of fit, Ann. Statist., 1, 2, 380-387 (1973) · Zbl 0256.62018
[23] Dieterle, S. G.; Snell, A., A simple diagnostic to investigate instrument validity and heterogeneous effects when using a single instrument, Lab. Econ., 42, C, 76-86 (2016)
[24] Dominguez, M. A.; Lobato, I. N., Consistent estimation of models defined by conditional moment restrictions, Econometrica, 72, 5, 1601-1615 (2004) · Zbl 1141.91635
[25] Dreier, I.; Kotz, S., A note on the characteristic function of the T-distribution, Statist. Probab. Lett., 57, 3, 221-224 (2002) · Zbl 1001.60020
[26] Dufour, J.-M., Some impossibility theorems in econometrics with applications to structural and dynamic models, Econometrica, 65, 1365-1388 (1997) · Zbl 0886.62116
[27] Dufour, J.-M., Identification, weak instruments, and statistical inference in econometrics, Can. J. Econ., 36, 767-808 (2003)
[28] Dufour, J.-M.; Taamouti, M., Projection-based statistical inference in linear structural models with possibly weak instruments, Econometrica, 73, 4, 1351-1365 (2005) · Zbl 1155.62486
[29] Dufour, J.-M.; Taamouti, M., Further results on projection-based inference in IV regressions with weak, collinear or missing instruments, J. Econometrics, 139, 1, 133-153 (2007) · Zbl 1418.62447
[30] Escanciano, J. C., A simple and robust estimator for linear regression models with strictly exogenous instruments, Econom. J., 21, 1, 36-54 (2018) · Zbl 07565931
[31] Hahn, J.; Hausman, J., Weak instruments: Diagnosis and cures in empirical economics, Am. Econ. Rev., 93, 118-125 (2003)
[32] Han, C.; Phillips, P., GMM with many moment conditions, Econometrica, 74, 1, 147-192 (2006) · Zbl 1112.62136
[33] Hansen, C.; Hausman, J.; Newey, W., Estimation with many instrumental variables, J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 26, 398-422 (2008)
[34] Hausman, J. A.; Newey, W. K.; Woutersen, T.; Chao, J. C.; Swanson, N. R., Instrumental variable estimation with heteroskedasticity and many instruments, Quant. Econ., 3, 2, 211-255 (2012) · Zbl 1408.62037
[35] Johnson, N.; Kotz, S.; Balakrishnan, N., (Continuous Univariate Distributions. Continuous Univariate Distributions, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Applied Probability and Statistics, vol. 2 (1995), Wiley & Sons) · Zbl 0821.62001
[36] Jun, S. J.; Pinkse, J., Testing under weak identification with conditional moment restrictions, Econom. Theory, 28, 6, 1229-1282 (2012) · Zbl 1281.62114
[37] Kasy, M., Uniformity and the Delta method, J. Econ. Methods, 8, 1 (2018)
[38] Kleibergen, F., Pivotal statistics for testing structural parameters in instrumental variables regression, Econometrica, 70, 5, 1781-1803 (2002) · Zbl 1141.62361
[39] Kleibergen, F., Testing parameters in GMM without assuming that they are identified, Econometrica, 73, 1103-1123 (2005) · Zbl 1152.91715
[40] Kleibergen, F., Generalizing weak instrument robust IV statistics towards multiple parameters, unrestricted covariance matrices and identification statistics, J. Econometrics, 139, 1, 181-216 (2007) · Zbl 1418.62490
[41] Kosorok, M. R., (Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference. Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference, Springer Series in Statistics (2008), Springer-Verlag New York) · Zbl 1180.62137
[42] Lavergne, P.; Patilea, V., Smooth minimum distance estimation and testing with conditional estimating equations: Uniform in bandwidth theory, J. Econometrics, 177, 1, 47-59 (2013) · Zbl 1285.62033
[43] Lehmann, E.; Romano, J., (Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Springer Texts in Statistics (2005), Springer) · Zbl 1076.62018
[44] Mikusheva, A., Robust confidence sets in the presence of weak instruments, J. Econometrics, 157, 2, 236-247 (2010) · Zbl 1400.62330
[45] Mikusheva, A., Sun, L., 2021. Inference with Many Weak Instruments. Forthcoming at The Review of Economic Studies.
[46] Montiel Olea, J. L., Admissible, similar tests: A characterization, Econom. Theory, 36, 347-366 (2020) · Zbl 1435.62087
[47] Moreira, M. J., A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models, Econometrica, 71, 1027-1048 (2003) · Zbl 1151.62367
[48] Moreira, H.; Moreira, M. J., Optimal two-sided tests for instrumental variables regression with heteroskedastic and autocorrelated errors, J. Econometrics, 213, 2, 398-433 (2019) · Zbl 1456.62029
[49] Moreira, M. J.; Ridder, G., Optimal Invariant Tests in an Instrumental Variables Regression With Heteroskedastic and Autocorrelated ErrorsWorking paper (2017), FPG
[50] Newey, W.; Windmeijer, F., Generalized method of moments with many weak moment conditions, Econometrica, 77, 3, 687-719 (2009) · Zbl 1176.62055
[51] Rice, J., Bandwidth choice for nonparametric regression, Ann. Statist., 12, 4, 1215-1230 (1984) · Zbl 0554.62035
[52] Robins, J.; van der Vaart, A., Adaptive nonparametric confidence sets, Ann. Statist., 34, 1, 229-253 (2006) · Zbl 1091.62039
[53] Rotar’, V., Limit theorems for polylinear forms, J. Multivariate Anal., 9, 4, 511-530 (1979) · Zbl 0426.62013
[54] Seifert, B.; Gasser, T.; Wolf, A., Nonparametric estimation of residual variance revisited, Biometrika, 80, 2, 373-383 (1993) · Zbl 0799.62038
[55] Sellars, E. A.; Alix-Garcia, J., Labor scarcity, land tenure, and historical legacy: Evidence from mexico, J. Dev. Econ., 135, 504-516 (2018)
[56] Shao, J., (Mathematical Statistics. Mathematical Statistics, Springer Texts in Statistics (2003), Springer-Verlag New York) · Zbl 1018.62001
[57] Staiger, D.; Stock, J. H., Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments, Econometrica, 65, 557-586 (1997) · Zbl 0871.62101
[58] Stinchcombe, M. B.; White, H., Consistent specification testing with nuisance parameters present only under the alternative, Econom. Theory, 14, 3, 295-325 (1998) · Zbl 1419.62105
[59] Stock, J. H.; Wright, J. H., GMM with weak identification, Econometrica, 68, 1055-1096 (2000) · Zbl 1015.62105
[60] Stock, J. H.; Wright, J. H.; Yogo, M., A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments, J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 20, 518-529 (2002)
[61] van der Vaart, A., Bracketing smooth functions, Stoch. Proc. Appl., 52, 1, 93-105 (1994) · Zbl 0811.60025
[62] van der Vaart, A. W.; Wellner, J. A., Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: with Applications to Statistics (2000), Springer: Springer New York
[63] Wood, S., Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (2017), Chapman and Hall: Chapman and Hall Boca Raton, FL · Zbl 1368.62004
[64] Yin, J.; Geng, Z.; Li, R.; Wang, H., Nonparametric covariance model, Statist. Sin., 20, 469-479 (2010) · Zbl 1180.62065
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.