×

Admissible invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression. (English) Zbl 1278.62029

Summary: This paper studies a model widely used in the weak instruments literature and establishes admissibility of the weighted average power likelihood ratio tests recently derived by D. W. K. Andrews et al. [Optimal invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression. NBER Technical Working Paper 299 (2004), http://www.nber.org/papers/t0299]. The class of tests covered by this admissibility result contains the Anderson-Rubin test [T. W. Anderson and H. Rubin, Ann. Math. Stat. 20, 46–63 (1949; Zbl 0033.08002)]. Thus, there is no conventional statistical sense in which the Anderson-Rubin test “wastes degrees of freedom”. In addition, it is shown that the test proposed by M. J. Moreira [Econometrica 71, No. 4, 1027–1048 (2003; Zbl 1151.62367)] belongs to the closure of (i.e., can be interpreted as a limiting case of) the class of tests covered by our admissibility result.

MSC:

62F03 Parametric hypothesis testing
62C15 Admissibility in statistical decision theory
62H15 Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ferguson, Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach (1967)
[2] DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00438 · Zbl 1151.62367 · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00438
[3] DOI: 10.2307/2171740 · Zbl 0886.62116 · doi:10.2307/2171740
[4] DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00764.x · Zbl 1142.91396 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00764.x
[5] Andrews, Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress III pp 122– (2007)
[6] DOI: 10.1198/073500102288618658 · doi:10.1198/073500102288618658
[7] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176324316 · Zbl 0843.62023 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176324316
[8] DOI: 10.2307/2171753 · Zbl 0871.62101 · doi:10.2307/2171753
[9] DOI: 10.1002/9780470316559 · doi:10.1002/9780470316559
[10] DOI: 10.2307/2171868 · Zbl 0844.62018 · doi:10.2307/2171868
[11] DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177730090 · Zbl 0033.08002 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730090
[12] Lehmann, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (2005) · Zbl 1076.62018
[13] DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00353 · Zbl 1141.62361 · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00353
[14] DOI: 10.1257/000282803321946912 · doi:10.1257/000282803321946912
[15] DOI: 10.1111/1540-5982.t01-3-00001 · doi:10.1111/1540-5982.t01-3-00001
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.