×

Involutions and higher order automorphisms of Higgs bundle moduli spaces. (English) Zbl 1427.14068

Let \(X\) be a compact Riemann surface and \(G\) a complex connected semisimple Lie group. A \(G\)-Higgs bundle over \(X\) is a pair \((E, \varphi)\) where \(E\) is a principal \(G\)-bundle over \(X\) and \(\varphi\) a section of the vector bundle \(E( \mathfrak{g} ) \otimes K\) associated to \(E\) via the adjoint representation of \(G\) on \(T_e G =: \mathfrak{g}\).
The moduli space \({\mathcal M} (G)\) of polystable \(G\)-Higgs bundles over \(X\) is an algebraic variety over \({\mathbb C}\), and has a hyperkähler structure. It is moreover homeomorphic to the space \({\mathcal R} (G)\) of reductive representations of \(\pi_1 (X)\) in \(G\) modulo conjugation. See for example [O. García-Prada, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 359, 265–310 (2009; Zbl 1187.14037)] for an overview.
In the present paper, the authors study the fixed loci of certain finite order automorphisms of \({\mathcal M} (G)\), describing them in terms of decorated principal bundles. For involutions, the fixed loci are also interpreted in terms of representations of \(\pi_1 (X)\) in certain real forms of \(G\), leading to a description as hyperkähler or Lagrangian submanifolds of \({\mathcal M} (G)\).
To give some more detail: Suppose \(\theta \in \mathrm{Aut} (G)\) has order \(n\), and write \(\zeta_k = \exp \left( 2\pi \sqrt{-1} \frac{k}{n} \right)\). Then the map \((E, \varphi) \mapsto ( \theta(E), \zeta_k \cdot \theta (\varphi) )\) defines an order \(n\) automorphism \((\theta, \zeta_k)\) of \({\mathcal M} (G)\), which in fact only depends on the class of \(\theta\) in \(\mathrm{Out} (G)\). A main result (Theorem 6.3) is that if \((E, \varphi)\) is a polystable and simple fixed point of \(( \theta , \zeta_k)\), then the structure group of \(E\) can be reduced to the fixed subgroup \(G^{\theta'} \subset G\) for a certain conjugate \(\theta'\) of \(\theta\); and \(\varphi\) belongs to the \(\zeta_k\)-eigenspace for the action of \(\theta'\) on \(\mathfrak{g}\). Moreover, the fixed locus depends only on the class of \(\theta\) in \(\mathrm{Out} (G)\).
Generalising further; let \(\alpha \in H^1 ( X, Z )\) be a principal \(Z\)-bundle, where \(Z\) is the centre of \(G\). Via the multiplication \(G \times Z \to G\), one can define a \(G\)-bundle \(E \otimes \alpha\), generalising the notion of tensor product of a vector bundle by a line bundle. For \((\alpha, a )\) an element of order \(n\) in \(H^1 ( X, Z ) \rtimes \mathrm{Out} (G)\), the authors consider automorphisms \((\alpha, a, \zeta_k)\) of \({\mathcal M} (G)\) given by \[ (E, \varphi) \ \mapsto \ ( a(E) \otimes \alpha , \zeta_k \cdot a(\varphi) ) . \] Let \(G_\theta \subset G\) be the subgroup \(\{ s \in G : \theta(s) \cdot s \ \in \ Z \}\), which the authors show in fact coincides with \(N_G ( G^\theta )\). In Theorem 6.10, the authors describe the fixed locus \({\mathcal M} (G)^{(\alpha, \theta, \zeta_k )}\) in terms of \((G_\theta, \zeta_k )\)-Higgs bundles, directly generalising Theorem 6.3.
To prove Theorems 6.3 and 6.10, in Sections 2–5, technical tools are developed. In section 2, required statements on automorphisms and real forms of Lie algebras and Lie groups are obtained. To mention just one result of independent interest; following an approach in [J. Adams and O. Taïbi, Duke Math. J. 167, No. 6, 1057–1097 (2018; Zbl 1410.11036)], real forms of \(G\) are classified by the cohomology set \(H^1 ( \mathbb{Z}/2 , \mathrm{Aut}(G) )\).
In Section 3, the relation is studied between (possibly twisted) automorphisms of a principal \(G\)-bundle and reductions of structure group of the bundle. The main statements are Propositions 3.3. and 3.9, whose ingenious methods of proof may well be further applicable.
Section 4 contains a discussion of degree, stability, polystability, semistability and simplicity for \(G\)-Higgs bundles, and the relation of polystability with the Hitchin equations (see [N. J. Hitchin, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 55, 59–126 (1987; Zbl 0634.53045)], [C. T. Simpson, J. Am. Math. Soc. 1, No. 4, 867–918 (1988; Zbl 0669.58008); Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci. 75, 5–95 (1992; Zbl 0814.32003)]).
Section 5 introduces \((G^\theta , \zeta_k)\)-bundles and \((G_\theta , \zeta_k)\)-bundles, a generalisation of \(G\)-Higgs bundles. The Hitchin equations are a useful tool for relating \(\alpha\)-polystability of \(( G^\theta, \zeta_k )\)- or \(( G_\theta, \zeta_k )\)-Higgs bundles with polystability of \(G\)-Higgs bundles.
Section 6 contains the main results on the fixed loci outlined above.
In Sections 7–8, the authors study the images of the fixed loci under the homeomorphism between \({\mathcal M} (G)\) and the moduli space \({\mathcal R} (G)\) of reductive representations of \(\pi_1 (X)\), focusing primarily on involutions. In this case, the fixed loci of \((\theta, 1)\) correspond to representations of \(\pi_1 ( X )\) in \(G^\theta\), and those of \((\theta, -1)\) to representations of \(\pi_1 (X)\) in certain real forms of \(G\). Similar statements are obtained for the involutions \((\alpha, a , \pm 1 )\). In Theorem 8.10, it is shown how the two types of fixed loci give rise to hyperkähler and Lagrangian submanifolds of \({\mathcal M} (G)\) respectively; and thereby to \((B, B, B)\)-branes and \((B, A, A)\)-branes respectively.
The authors conclude with a detailed discussion of the cases \(G = \mathrm{SL} (n , {\mathbb C} )\) and \(G = \mathrm{Spin} ( 8, {\mathbb C} )\) to illustrate the general theory. Of particular interest for \(\mathrm{SL} (2, {\mathbb C})\) is the relation with Prym varieties. Also, an example is given showing that the nonsimple part of the fixed locus may contain points which are not defined by \((G_\theta, \zeta_k)\)-Higgs bundles (compare with Theorem 6.3). The case of \(\mathrm{Spin} ( 8, {\mathbb C} )\) is notable because, uniquely among simply connected complex simple Lie groups, \(\mathrm{Spin} (8, \mathbb{C})\) has an outer automorphism group which is nonabelian and also contains elements of order greater than two, namely \(S^3\).
This is a highly interesting and stimulating paper. Moreover, the authors have made a considerable effort to make the work as self-contained and accessible as possible, being generous with explanations and remarks.

MSC:

14H60 Vector bundles on curves and their moduli
57R57 Applications of global analysis to structures on manifolds
58D29 Moduli problems for topological structures
14J50 Automorphisms of surfaces and higher-dimensional varieties

References:

[1] J.Adams and O.Taidi, ‘Galois and Cartan cohomology of real groups’, Duke Math. J.167 (2018) 1057-1097. · Zbl 1410.11036
[2] Á. AntónSancho, ‘Higgs bundles and triality’, PhD Thesis, UCM‐CSIC, 2009.
[3] M. F.Atiyah, ‘Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.85 (1957) 181-207. · Zbl 0078.16002
[4] D.Baraglia and L. P.Schaposnik, ‘Real structures on moduli spaces of Higgs bundles’, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.20 (2016) 525-551. · Zbl 1372.81165
[5] O.Biquard, O.García‐Prada and R.Rubio, ‘Higgs bundles, the Toledo invariant and the Cayley correspondence’, J. Topol.10 (2017) 795-826. · Zbl 1393.14032
[6] I.Biswas and O.García‐Prada, ‘Antiholomorphic involutions of the moduli spaces of Higgs bundles’, J. Éc. polytech. Math.2 (2015) 35-54. · Zbl 1333.14032
[7] I.Biswas and T. L.Gómez, ‘Connections and Higgs fields on a principal bundle’, Ann. Global Anal. Geom.33 (2008) 19-46. · Zbl 1185.14032
[8] S. B.Bradlow, O.García‐Prada and P. B.Gothen, ‘Surface group representations and \(\operatorname{U} ( p , q )\)‐Higgs bundles’, J. Differential Geom.64 (2003) 111-170. · Zbl 1070.53054
[9] S. B.Bradlow, O.García‐Prada and P. B.Gothen, ‘Maximal surface group representations in isometry groups of classical Hermitian symmetric spaces’, Geom. Dedicata.122 (2007) 185-213. · Zbl 1132.14029
[10] B.Collier, ‘Finite order automorphisms of Higgs bundles: theory and application’, PhD Thesis UIUC, 2016.
[11] K.Corlette, ‘Flat \(G\)‐bundles with canonical metrics’, J. Differential Geom.28 (1988) 361-382. · Zbl 0676.58007
[12] R.Donagi and T.Pantev, ‘Langlands duality for Hitchin systems’, Invent. Math.189 (2012) 653-735. · Zbl 1263.53078
[13] S. K.Donaldson, ‘Twisted harmonic maps and the self‐duality equations’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 55 (1987) 127-131. · Zbl 0634.53046
[14] É.Cartan, ‘Les groupes réels simples, finis et continus’, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (3) 31 (1914) 263-355. · JFM 45.1238.06
[15] O.García‐Prada, ‘Involutions of the moduli space of \(\operatorname{ SL } ( n , C )\)‐Higgs bundles and real forms’, Vector bundles and low codimensional subvarieties: state of the art and recent developments (eds G.Casnati (ed.), F.Catanese (ed.) and R.Notari (ed.); Aracne, Rome, 2007).
[16] O.García‐Prada, ‘Higgs bundles and surface group representations’, Moduli spaces and vector bundles, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 359 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009) 265-310. · Zbl 1187.14037
[17] O.García‐Prada, P. B.Gothen and I. Mundet iRiera, ‘The Hitchin-Kobayashi correspondence, Higgs pairs and surface group representations’, Preprint, 2009, arXiv:0909.4487 [math.AG].
[18] O.García‐Prada and A.Oliveira, ‘Higgs bundles for the non‐compact dual of the unitary group’, Illinois J. Math.55 (2011) 1155-1181. · Zbl 1274.14008
[19] O.García‐Prada and A.Oliveira, ‘Connectedness of Higgs bundle moduli for complex reductive Lie groups’, Asian J. Math.21 (2017) 791-810. · Zbl 1387.14048
[20] O.García‐Prada and S.Ramanan, ‘Involutions of rank 2 Higgs bundle moduli spaces’, Geometry and physics: a festschrift in honour of Nigel Hitchin, vol. 2 (eds J. E.Andersen (ed.), A.Dancer (ed.) and O.Gracía‐Prada (ed.); Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018) 535-580. · Zbl 1420.14073
[21] W.Goldman, ‘Topological components of spaces of representations’, Invent. Math.93 (1988) 557-607. · Zbl 0655.57019
[22] M.Goto and E. T.Kobayashi, ‘On the subgroups of the centers of simply connected simple Lie groups — classification of simple Lie groups in the large’, Osaka J. Math.6 (1969) 251-281. · Zbl 0225.22015
[23] S.Helgason, Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 80 (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998).
[24] N. J.Hitchin, ‘Stable bundles and integrable systems’, Duke Math. J.54 (1987) 91-114. · Zbl 0627.14024
[25] N. J.Hitchin, ‘The self‐duality equations on a Riemann surface’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 55 (1987) 59-126. · Zbl 0634.53045
[26] N. J.Hitchin, ‘Lie groups and Teichmüller space’, Topology31 (1992) 449-473. · Zbl 0769.32008
[27] N. J.Hitchin, ‘Higgs bundles and characteristic classes’, Arbeitstagung Bonn 2013: in memory of Friedrich Hirzebruch, Progress in Mathematics 319 (eds W.Ballmann (ed.), C.Blohmann (ed.), G.Faltings (ed.), P.Teichner (ed.) and D.Zagier (ed.); Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016) 247-264. · Zbl 1379.57035
[28] A.Kapustin and E.Witten, ‘Electric magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands programme’, Commun. Number Theory Phys.1 (2007) 1-236. · Zbl 1128.22013
[29] S.Kobayashi and K.Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry, vol. I (Interscience, New York, NY, 1963). · Zbl 0119.37502
[30] S.Kobayashi and K.Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry, vols. II (Interscience, New York, NY, 1969). · Zbl 0175.48504
[31] F.Labourie, ‘Existence d’applications harmoniques tordues à valeurs dans les variétés à courbure négative’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.111 (1991) 877-882. · Zbl 0783.58016
[32] J.Li, ‘The space of surface group representations’, Manuscripta Math.78 (1993) 223-243. · Zbl 0803.32020
[33] B.Martin, ‘Reductive subgroups of reductive groups in nonzero characteristic’, J. Algebra262 (2003) 265-286. · Zbl 1103.20045
[34] J.Milnor, ‘On the existence of a connection with curvature zero’, Comment. Math. Helv.32 (1958) 215-223. · Zbl 0196.25101
[35] M. S.Narasimhan and S.Ramanan, ‘Generalised Prym varieties as fixed points’, Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.)39 (1975) 1-19. · Zbl 0422.14018
[36] M. S.Narasimhan and C. S.Seshadri, ‘Stable and unitary vector bundles on a compact Riemann surface’, Ann. Math.82 (1965) 540-567. · Zbl 0171.04803
[37] N.Nitsure, ‘Moduli spaces of semistable pairs on a curve’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.62 (1991) 275-300. · Zbl 0733.14005
[38] A. L.Onishchik, Lectures on real semisimple lie algebras and their representations, (European Mathematical Society, Zurich, 2004). · Zbl 1080.17001
[39] A. L.Onishchik and E. B.Vinberg (ed.), Lie groups and Lie algebras III, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 41 (Springer, Berlin, 1994). · Zbl 0797.22001
[40] S.Ramanan, ‘Some aspects of the theory of Higgs pairs’, The many facets of geometry: a tribute to Nigel Hitchin (eds O.García‐Prada (ed.), J. P.Bourguignon (ed.) and S.Salamon (ed.); Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010) 92-112. · Zbl 1207.14037
[41] A.Ramanathan, ‘Stable principal bundles on a compact Riemann surface’, Math. Ann.213 (1975) 129-152. · Zbl 0284.32019
[42] A. H. W.Schmitt, Geometric invariant theory and decorated principal bundles, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics (European Mathematical Society, Zurich, 2008). · Zbl 1159.14001
[43] J.‐P.Serre, Cohomology galoisienne, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 5 (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1964).
[44] J.deSiebenthal, ‘Sur les groupes de Lie compact non‐connexes’, Comment. Math. Helv.31 (1956) 41-89. · Zbl 0075.01602
[45] C. T.Simpson, ‘Constructing variations of Hodge structure using Yang‐Mills theory and applications to uniformization’, J. Amer. Math. Soc.1 (1988) 867-918. · Zbl 0669.58008
[46] C. T.Simpson, ‘Higgs bundles and local systems’, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci.75 (1992) 5-95. · Zbl 0814.32003
[47] C. T.Simpson, ‘Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety I’, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci.79 (1994) 47-129. · Zbl 0891.14005
[48] C. T.Simpson, ‘Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety II’, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci.80 (1995) 5-79. · Zbl 0891.14006
[49] C. T.Simpson, ‘Katz’s middle convolution algorithm’, Pure Appl. Math. Q.5 (2009) 781-852. (Special Issue: In honor of Friedrich Hirzebruch. Part 1.) · Zbl 1176.14002
[50] J. A.Wolf and A.Gray, ‘Homogeneous spaces defined by Lie group automorphisms. I’, J. Differential Geom.2 (1968) 77-114. · Zbl 0169.24103
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.