×

Developing a novel fuzzy testing model for capability index with asymmetric tolerances. (English) Zbl 07910179

Summary: While the Taguchi capability index developed by Chan (J Qual Technol 20(3):162-175, 1988) takes the process targeting issue into consideration, it fails to account for processes with asymmetric tolerances, which are common in practice. Thus, Chen (Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 6(4):383-398) modified this index to include processes with asymmetric tolerances. This index is an important tool for the assessment of quality characteristics with asymmetric tolerances, which are common in practice. As the probability density function of the index is complex, statistical inference can be fairly difficult for quality or process engineers. Furthermore, sample sizes are often small in practice to increase decision-making efficiency, but this can decrease assessment accuracy. To address this issue, we employed a mathematical programming approach to make it more convenient for quality or process engineers to derive the upper confidence limit of the index. We also adopted the suggestion put forward by previous studies to incorporate historical data or expert experience in confidence-interval-based fuzzy testing. The proposed approach therefore has increased assessment accuracy, is convenient to apply in practice, and meets the need for swift responses.

MSC:

62Pxx Applications of statistics
62Fxx Parametric inference
60Kxx Special processes
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Buckley, JJ, Fuzzy statistics: Hypothesis testing, Soft Computing, 9, 7, 512-518, 2005 · Zbl 1079.62026
[2] Chan, LK; Cheng, SW; Spiring, FA, A new measure of process capability C_pm, Journal of Quality Technology, 20, 3, 162-175, 1988
[3] Chang, YC, Interval estimation of capability index Cpmk for manufacturing processes with asymmetric tolerances, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56, 1, 312-322, 2009
[4] Chang, YC; Wu, CW, Assessing process capability based on the lower confidence bound of Cpk for asymmetric tolerances, European Journal of Operational Research, 190, 1, 205-227, 2008 · Zbl 1140.62089
[5] Chen, KS, Incapability index with asymmetric tolerances, Statistica Sinica, 8, 1, 253-262, 1998 · Zbl 0886.62097
[6] Chang, TC; Chen, KS, Statistical test of two Taguchi Six-Sigma quality indices to select the supplier with optimal processing quality, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 50, 1, 674-688, 2022
[7] Chen, KS, Fuzzy testing of operating performance index based on confidence intervals, Annals of Operations Research, 311, 1, 19-33, 2022 · Zbl 1485.90021
[8] Chen, KS; Chang, TC, Construction and fuzzy hypothesis testing of Taguchi Six Sigma quality index, International Journal of Production Research, 58, 10, 3110-3125, 2020
[9] Chen, KS; Huang, CF; Chang, TC, A mathematical programming model for constructing the confidence interval of process capability index C_pm in evaluating process performance: An example of five-way pipe, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 40, 2, 126-133, 2017
[10] Chen, KS; Pearn, WL, Capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerances, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 24, 5, 559-568, 2001
[11] Chen, KS; Pearn, WL; Lin, PC, A new generalization of C_pm for processes with asymmetric tolerances, International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 6, 4, 383-398, 1999
[12] Chen, KS; Wang, CH; Tan, KH; Chiu, SF, Developing one-sided specification Six-Sigma fuzzy quality index and testing model to measure the process performance of fuzzy information, International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 560-565, 2019
[13] Chen, KS; Yang, CM, Developing a performance index with a Poisson process and an exponential distribution for operations management and continuous improvement, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 343, 737-747, 2018 · Zbl 1457.90053
[14] Chen, KS; Yu, CM, Fuzzy test model for performance evaluation matrix of service operating systems, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106240, 2020
[15] Chen, KS; Yu, CM; Huang, ML, Fuzzy selection model for quality-based IC packaging process outsourcers, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 35, 1, 102-109, 2022
[16] Cheng, SW, Practical implementation of the process capability indices, Quality Engineering, 7, 2, 239-259, 1994
[17] Kaya, İ.; Kahraman, C., Fuzzy process capability indices with asymmetric tolerances, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12, 14882-14890, 2011
[18] Li, W.; Liu, G., Dynamic failure mode analysis approach based on an improved Taguchi process capability index, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108152, 2022
[19] Lin, GH; Pearn, WL; Yang, YS, A Bayesian approach to obtain a lower bound for the C pm capability index, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21, 6, 655-668, 2005
[20] Pearn, WL; Lin, PC; Chen, KS, The index for asymmetric tolerances: Implications and inference, Metrika, 60, 2, 119-136, 2004 · Zbl 1079.62126
[21] Ruczinski, I. (1996). The Relation Between C_pm and the Degree of Includence. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
[22] Shu, MH; Wang, TC; Hsu, BM, Generalized quick-switch sampling systems indexed by Taguchi capability with record traceability, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 172, 108577, 2022
[23] Wang, CH; Chen, KS, New process yield index of asymmetric tolerances for bootstrap method and six sigma approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 216-223, 2020
[24] Yu, CM; Chen, KS, Fuzzy evaluation model for attribute service performance index, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 43, 4, 4849-4857, 2022
[25] Yu, CM; Chen, KS; Guo, YY, Production data evaluation analysis model: A case study of broaching machine, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 44, 7, 673-682, 2021
[26] Yu, CM; Lai, KK; Chen, KS; Chang, TC, Process-quality evaluation for wire bonding with multiple gold wires, IEEE Access, 8, 1, 106075-106082, 2020
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.