×

Event-triggered distributed \(H_\infty\) control of physically interconnected mobile Euler-Lagrange systems with slipping, skidding and dead zone. (English) Zbl 07907072

Summary: This study addresses an event-triggered distributed \(\mathscr{H}_\infty\) control method by extending traditional zero-sum differential games for physically interconnected non-holonomic mobile mechanical multi-agent systems with external disturbance and slipping, skidding and dead-zone disturbances. Initially, a problem of physically interconnected kinematic and dynamic control is transformed into an equivalent problem of event-triggered distributed \(\mathscr{H}_\infty\) control. Subsequently, the traditional two-player zero-sum differential game is extended to a three-player zero-sum differential game, where a new player is included to approximate the worst dead-zone disturbance. To find player policies, an event-triggering condition and an event-triggered control law are proposed via neural networks (NNs). Although an NN weight-tuning law is designed on the basis of adaptive dynamic programming techniques, it can relax identification procedures for unknown drift dynamics and persistent excitation conditions. It also guarantees that the closed system is stable and the cost function converges to the bounded \(\mathscr{L}_2\)-gain optimal value, while the Zeno behaviour is excluded. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by an application to a dead-zone torque multi-mobile robot system through numerical simulations.
© 2021 The Authors. IET Control Theory & Applications published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology

MSC:

93C65 Discrete event control/observation systems
93B36 \(H^\infty\)-control
93C40 Adaptive control/observation systems
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory
93C85 Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory
93A16 Multi-agent systems
49N70 Differential games and control
91A06 \(n\)-person games, \(n>2\)
91A23 Differential games (aspects of game theory)
91A10 Noncooperative games
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] TanL.N.: ‘Omnidirectional vision‐based distributed optimal tracking control for mobile multi‐robot systems with kinematic and dynamic disturbance rejection’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2018, 65, (7), pp. 5693-5703
[2] AhmedN.CortesJ., and MartinezS.: ‘Distributed control and estimation of robotic vehicle networks: overview of the special issue’, IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 2016, 36, (2), pp. 36-40 · Zbl 1476.93068
[3] AbdessameudA.TayebiA., and PolushinI.G.: ‘Leader‐follower synchronization of Euler-Lagrange systems with time‐varying leader trajectory and constrained discrete‐time communication’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2017, 62, (5), pp. 2539-2545 · Zbl 1366.93559
[4] ChenM.: ‘Disturbance attenuation tracking control for wheeled mobile robots with skidding and slipping’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2017, 64, (4), pp. 3359-3368
[5] ZhouQ.ZhaoS., and LiH.et al.: ‘Adaptive neural network tracking control for robotic manipulators with dead zone’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2018, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2869375
[6] AligiaD.A.MagallanG.A., and AngeloC.H.D.: ‘EV traction control based on nonlinear observers considering longitudinal and lateral tire forces’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2018, 19, (8), pp. 2558-2571
[7] SunK.SuiS., and TongS.: ‘Fuzzy adaptive decentralized optimal control for strict feedback nonlinear large‐scale systems’, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2018, 48, (4), pp. 1326-1339
[8] TahounA.H.: ‘Anti‐windup adaptive PID control design for a class of uncertain chaotic systems with input saturation’, ISA Trans., 2017, 66, pp. 176-184
[9] TahounA.H.: ‘A new online delay estimation‐based robust adaptive stabilizer for multi‐input neutral systems with unknown actuator nonlinearities’, ISA Trans., 2017, 70, pp. 139-148
[10] TahounA.H.: ‘Time‐varying multiplicative/additive faults compensation in both actuators and sensors simultaneously for nonlinear systems via robust sliding mode control scheme’, J. Franklin Inst., 2019, 356, (1), pp. 103-128 · Zbl 1405.93111
[11] SelmicR.R., and LewisF.L.: ‘Deadzone compensation in motion control systems using neural networks’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2000, 45, (4), pp. 602-613 · Zbl 0989.93068
[12] LiuZ.WangF., and ZhangY.: ‘Adaptive visual tracking control for manipulator with actuator fuzzy dead‐zone constraint and unmodeled dynamic’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2015, 45, (10), pp. 1301-1312
[13] HeW.DavidA.O., and YinZ.et al.: ‘Neural network control of a robotic manipulator with input deadzone and output constraint’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2016, 46, (6), pp. 759-770
[14] HuaC.ZhangL., and GuanX.: ‘Distributed adaptive neural network output tracking of leader‐following high‐order stochastic nonlinear multiagent systems with unknown dead‐zone input’, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2017, 47, (1), pp. 177-185
[15] WangG.WangC., and LiL.: ‘Fully distributed low‐complexity control for nonlinear strict‐feedback multiagent systems with unknown dead‐zone inputs’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2018, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2759305
[16] SuttonR.S., and BartoA.G.: ‘Reinforcement learning‐an introduction’ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998)
[17] MuC., and WangK.: ‘Approximate‐optimal control algorithm for constrained zero‐sum differential games through event‐triggering mechanism’, Nonlinear Dyn., 2019, 95, (4), pp. 2639-2657 · Zbl 1437.91080
[18] TatariF.VamvoudakisK.G., and MazouchiM.: ‘Optimal distributed learning for disturbance rejection in networked non‐linear games under unknown dynamics’, IET Control Theory Applic., 2019, 13, (17), pp. 2838-2848
[19] HuangY.: ‘Optimal guaranteed cost control of uncertain non‐linear systems using adaptive dynamic programming with concurrent learning’, IET Control Theory Applic., 2018, 12, (8), pp. 1025-1035
[20] ZhangQ.ZhaoD., and ZhuY.: ‘Event‐triggered \(H_\infty\) control for continuous‐time nonlinear system via concurrent learning’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2017, 47, (7), pp. 1071-1081
[21] ZhuY.ZhaoD., and HeH.et al.: ‘Event‐triggered optimal control for partially unknown constrained‐input systems via adaptive dynamic programming’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2017, 64, (5), pp. 4101-4109
[22] SunJ., and LiuC.: ‘Distributed fuzzy adaptive backstepping optimal control for nonlinear multimissile guidance systems with input saturation’, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2019, 27, (3), pp. 447-461
[23] TabuadaP.: ‘Event‐triggered real‐time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2007, 52, (9), pp. 1680-1685 · Zbl 1366.90104
[24] DingL.HanQ., and GeX.et al.: ‘An overview of recent advances in event‐triggered consensus of multiagent systems’, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2018, 48, (4), pp. 1110-1123
[25] SunZ.DaiL., and XiaY.et al.: ‘Event‐based model predictive tracking control of nonholonomic systems with coupled input constraint and bounded disturbances’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2018, 63, (2), pp. 608-615 · Zbl 1390.93579
[26] NarayananV., and JagannathanS.: ‘Event‐triggered distributed approximate optimal state and output control of affine nonlinear interconnected systems’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2018, 29, (7), pp. 2846-2856
[27] ChengB., and LiZ.: ‘Coordinated tracking control with asynchronous edge‐based event‐triggered communications’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2019, 64, (10), pp. 4321-4328, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2895927 · Zbl 1482.93012
[28] TianE.WangZ., and ZouL.et al.: ‘Probabilistic‐constrained filtering for a class of nonlinear systems with improved static event‐triggered communication’, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2019, 29, (5), pp. 1484-1498 · Zbl 1410.93130
[29] WangB.: ‘Cluster event‐triggered tracking cooperative and formation control for multivehicle systems: an extended magnification region condition’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2019, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2919664
[30] TanL.N.: ‘Event‐triggered distributed \(H_\infty\) constrained control of physically interconnected large‐scale partially unknown strict‐feedback systems’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2019, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2914160
[31] YuY., and YuanY.: ‘Event‐triggered active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear network control systems subject to dos and physical attacks’, ISA Trans., 2019, early access, doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.05.004
[32] DongC.LiuC., and WangQ.et al.: ‘Switched adaptive active disturbance rejection control of variable structure near space vehicles based on adaptive dynamic programming’, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2019, 32, (7), pp. 1684-1694
[33] YangJ.CuiH., and LiS.et al.: ‘Optimized active disturbance rejection control for DC‐DC buck converters with uncertainties using a reduced‐order \(\text{GPI}\) observer’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I., Regul. Pap., 2018, 65, (2), pp. 832-841
[34] RenW., and BeardR.W.: ‘Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2005, 50, (5), pp. 655-661 · Zbl 1365.93302
[35] LewisF.L.ZhangH.W., and Hengster‐MovricK.et al.: ‘Cooperative control of multi‐agent systems: optimal and adaptive design approaches’ (Spring‐Verlag, Berlin, 2014) · Zbl 1417.93015
[36] WangD., and LowC.B.: ‘Modeling and analysis of skidding and slipping in wheeled mobile robots: control design perspective’, IEEE Trans. Robot., 2008, 24, (3), pp. 676-687
[37] FierroR., and LewisF.L.: ‘Control of a nonholonomic mobile robot using neural networks’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1998, 9, (4), pp. 589-600
[38] TanY.DongR., and LiR.: ‘Recursive identification of sandwich systems with dead zone and application’, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol., 2009, 17, (4), pp. 945-951
[39] IoannouP., and SunJ.: ‘Robust adaptive control’ (Prentice‐Hall, New Jersey, 1996) · Zbl 0839.93002
[40] KhooS.XieL., and ManZ.: ‘Robust finite‐time consensus tracking algorithm for multirobot systems’, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 2009, 14, (2), pp. 219-228
[41] WenC.ZhouJ., and LiuZ.et al.: ‘Robust adaptive control of uncertain nonlinear systems in the presence of input saturation and external disturbance’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2011, 56, (7), pp. 1672-1678 · Zbl 1368.93317
[42] BasarT., and BernhardP.: ‘Optimal control and related minimax design problems: a dynamic game approach’ (Birkhuser, MA, 1995) · Zbl 0835.93001
[43] Abu‐KhalafM., and LewisF.L.: ‘Nearly optimal control laws for nonlinear systems with saturating actuators using a neural network HJB approach’, Automatica, 2005, 41, (5), pp. 779-791 · Zbl 1087.49022
[44] FinlaysonB.A.: ‘The method of weighted residuals and variational principles’ (Academic Press, New York, 1990)
[45] ChowdharyG., and JohnsonE.: ‘Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation’. 49th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010, pp. 3674-3679
[46] DasA.K.FierroR., and KumarV.et al.: ‘A vision‐based formation control framework’, IEEE Trans. Robot Autom., 2002, 18, (5), pp. 813-825
[47] TanL.N.: ‘Distributed \(H_\infty\) optimal tracking control for strict‐feedback nonlinear large‐scale systems with disturbances and saturating actuators’, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Syst., 2018, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2861470
[48] KhalilH.K.: ‘Nonlinear systems’ (Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2002, 3rd edn.)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.