×

Near-tip correction functions for the actuator line method to improve the predicted lift and drag distributions. (English) Zbl 07894554

Summary: The actuator line method (ALM) is a commonly used technique to simulate slender lifting and dragging bodies such as wings or blades. However, the accuracy of the method is significantly reduced near the tip. To quantify the loss of accuracy, translating wings with various aspect and taper ratios are simulated using several methods: wall-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, an advanced ALM with two-dimensional (2-D) mollification of the force, a lifting line method, a mollified lifting line method and a vortex lattice method. Significant differences in the lift and drag distributions are found on the part of the wing where the distance to the tip is smaller than approximately 3 chords and are identified to arise from both the forces mollification and the uneven induced velocity along the chord. Correction functions acting on the lift coefficient and effective angle of attack near the wing tip are then derived for rectangular wings of various aspect ratios. They are then also applied to wings of various taper ratios using the ‘effective dimensionless distance to the tip’ as the main parameter. The application of the correction not only leads to a much improved lift distribution, but also to a more consistent drag distribution. The correction functions are also obtained for various mollification sizes, as well as for ALM with three-dimensional (3-D) mollification. These changes mostly impact the correction for the effective angle of attack. Finally, the correction is applied to simulations of the NREL Phase VI wind turbine, leading to an enhanced agreement with the experimental data.

MSC:

76D99 Incompressible viscous fluids
76M12 Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
76M23 Vortex methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
76G25 General aerodynamics and subsonic flows
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Branlard, E., Dixon, K. & Gaunaa, M.2013Vortex methods to answer the need for improved understanding and modelling of tip-loss factors. IET Renew. Power Gener.7 (4), 311-320.
[2] Breton, S.-P., Sumner, J., Sørensen, J.N., Hansen, K.S., Sarmast, S. & Ivanell, S.2017A survey of modelling methods for high-fidelity wind farm simulations using large eddy simulation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Engng Sci.375 (2091), 20160097. · Zbl 1404.76136
[3] Bühler, M., Weihing, P., Klein, L., Lutz, T. & Krämer, E.2018Actuator line method simulations for the analysis of wind turbine wakes acting on helicopters. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.1037, 062004.
[4] Caprace, D.-G., Chatelain, P. & Winckelmans, G.2019Lifting line with various mollifications: theory and application to an elliptical wing. AIAA J.57 (1), 17-28.
[5] Chow, J.S.1994Turbulence Measurements in the Near-Field of a Wingtip Vortex. Stanford University.
[6] Chow, J.S., Zilliac, G.G. & Bradshaw, P.1997Mean and turbulence measurements in the near field of a wingtip vortex. AIAA J.35 (10), 1561-1567.
[7] Churchfield, M.J. & Blaisdell, G.A.2013Reynolds stress relaxation turbulence modeling applied to a wingtip vortex flow. AIAA J.51 (11), 2643-2655.
[8] Churchfield, M.J., Schreck, S.J., Martinez, L.A., Meneveau, C. & Spalart, P.R.2017 An advanced actuator line method for wind energy applications and beyond. AIAA Paper 2017-1998.
[9] Dag, K.O. & Sørensen, J.N.2020A new tip correction for actuator line computations. Wind Energy23 (2), 148-160.
[10] Duponcheel, M., Bricteux, L., Manconi, M., Winckelmans, G. & Bartosiewicz, Y.2014Assessment of RANS and improved near-wall modeling for forced convection at low prandtl numbers based on LES up to \(re_{\tau }=2000\). Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer75, 470-482.
[11] Glauert, H.1935Airplane Propellers, pp. 169-360. Springer.
[12] Hand, M.M., Simms, D., Fingersh, L., Jager, D., Cotrell, J., Schreck, S. & Larwood, S.2001 Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns. Tech. Rep. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
[13] Jeanmart, H. & Winckelmans, G.2007 Investigation of eddy-viscosity models modified using discrete filters: A simplified ‘regularized variational multiscale model’ and an ‘enhanced field model’. Phys. Fluids19 (5), 055110. · Zbl 1146.76426
[14] Jha, P.K., Churchfield, M.J., Moriarty, P.J. & Schmitz, S.2014Guidelines for volume force distributions within actuator line modeling of wind turbines on large-eddy simulation-type grids. Trans. ASME: J. Sol. Energy Engng136 (3), 031003.
[15] Jha, P.K. & Schmitz, S.2018Actuator curve embedding – an advanced actuator line model. J. Fluid Mech.834, R2. · Zbl 1419.76688
[16] Jonkman, J.M.2003 Modeling of the uae wind turbine for refinement of FAST_AD. Tech. Rep. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
[17] Katz, J. & Plotkin, A.2001Low-Speed Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 0976.76003
[18] Kleine, V.G., Hanifi, A. & Henningson, D.S.2023aNon-iterative vortex-based smearing correction for the actuator line method. J. Fluid Mech.961, A29. · Zbl 07678946
[19] Kleine, V.G., Hanifi, A. & Henningson, D.S.2023bSimulating airplane aerodynamics with body forces: actuator line method for nonplanar wings. AIAA J.61 (5), 2048-2059.
[20] Li, A., Gaunaa, M., Pirrung, G.R., Meyer Forsting, A. & Horcas, S.G.2022How should the lift and drag forces be calculated from 2-d airfoil data for dihedral or coned wind turbine blades?Wind Energy Sci.7 (4), 1341-1365.
[21] Maniaci, D. & Schmitz, S.2016Extended glauert tip correction to include vortex rollup effects. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.753, 022051.
[22] Martinez, L., Leonardi, S., Churchfield, M. & Moriarty, P.2012 A comparison of actuator disk and actuator line wind turbine models and best practices for their use. AIAA Paper 2012-0900.
[23] Martínez-Tossas, L.A., Churchfield, M.J. & Meneveau, C.2017Optimal smoothing length scale for actuator line models of wind turbine blades based on gaussian body force distribution. Wind Energy20 (6), 1083-1096.
[24] Martínez-Tossas, L.A. & Meneveau, C.2019Filtered lifting line theory and application to the actuator line model. J. Fluid Mech.863, 269-292. · Zbl 1415.76404
[25] Melani, P., Balduzzi, F. & Bianchini, A.2022Simulating tip effects in vertical-axis wind turbines with the actuator line method. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.2265 (3), 032028.
[26] Melani, P.F., Balduzzi, F., Ferrara, G. & Bianchini, A.2021Tailoring the actuator line theory to the simulation of vertical-axis wind turbines. Energy Convers. Manage.243, 114422.
[27] Mendoza, V., Bachant, P., Ferreira, C. & Goude, A.2018Near-wake flow simulation of a vertical axis turbine using an actuator line model. Wind Energy22 (2), 171-188.
[28] Merabet, R. & Laurendeau, E.2022Hovering helicopter rotors modeling using the actuator line method. J. Aircraft59 (3), 774-787.
[29] Meyer Forsting, A.R., Pirrung, G.R. & Ramos-García, N.2019A vortex-based tip/smearing correction for the actuator line. Wind Energy Sci.4 (2), 369-383.
[30] Mikkelsen, R.F.2004 Actuator disk methods applied to wind turbines. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark.
[31] Moens, M., Duponcheel, M., Winckelmans, G. & Chatelain, P.2018An actuator disk method with tip-loss correction based on local effective upstream velocities. Wind Energy21 (9), 766-782.
[32] Pirrung, G.R., Van Der Laan, M.P., Ramos-García, N. & Meyer Forsting, A.R.2020A simple improvement of a tip loss model for actuator disc simulations. Wind Energy23 (4), 1154-1163.
[33] Shamsoddin, S. & Porté-Agel, F.2014Large eddy simulation of vertical axis wind turbine wakes. Energies7 (2), 890-912.
[34] Shen, W.Z., Mikkelsen, R., Sørensen, J.N. & Bak, C.2005aTip loss corrections for wind turbine computations. Wind Energy8 (4), 457-475.
[35] Shen, W.Z., Sørensen, J.N. & Mikkelsen, R.2005bTip loss correction for actuator/Navier-Stokes computations. Trans. ASME: J. Sol. Energy Engng127 (2), 209-213.
[36] Shives, M. & Crawford, C.2013Mesh and load distribution requirements for actuator line CFD simulations. Wind Energy16 (8), 1183-1196.
[37] Siemens2019 STAR-CCM+ User Guide, version 14.02.012. Available at: https://mdx.plm.automation.siemens.com/star-ccm-plus.
[38] Sørensen, J.N., Dag, K.O. & Ramos-García, N.2016A refined tip correction based on decambering. Wind Energy19 (5), 787-802.
[39] Sorensen, J.N. & Shen, W.Z.2002Numerical modeling of wind turbine wakes. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng124 (2), 393-399.
[40] Stanly, R., Martinez-Tossas, L.A., Frankel, S.H. & Delorme, Y.2022Large-eddy simulation of a wind turbine using a filtered actuator line model. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn.222, 104868.
[41] Stokkermans, T.C., Van Arnhem, N., Sinnige, T. & Veldhuis, L.L.2019Validation and comparison of rans propeller modeling methods for tip-mounted applications. AIAA J.57 (2), 566-580.
[42] Troldborg, N.2008 Actuator line modelling of wind turbine wakes. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark.
[43] Villeneuve, T., Boudreau, M. & Dumas, G.2019Lift enhancement and drag reduction of lifting blades through the use of end-plates and detached end-plates. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn.184, 391-404.
[44] Villeneuve, T., Winckelmans, G. & Dumas, G.2021Increasing the efficiency of vertical-axis turbines through improved blade support structures. Renew. Energy169, 1386-1401.
[45] Wimshurst, A. & Willden, R.2017Analysis of a tip correction factor for horizontal axis turbines. Wind Energy20 (9), 1515-1528.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.