×
Wang, To-Cheng; Hsu, Bi-Min; Shu, Ming-Hung

Quick-switch inspection scheme based on the overall process capability index for modern industrial web-based processing environment. (English) Zbl 07888949

Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 38, No. 5, 847-861 (2022).

MSC:

62-XX Statistics

Keywords:

Industry 4.0 environments; multiple quality characteristics; overall process capability index; variables quick-switch sampling system; web-based environment

Software:

R; shiny
Cite Review PDF
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DalenogareLS, BenitezGB, AyalaNF, FrankAG. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int J Prod Econ. 2018;204:383‐394.
[2] ChiariniA. Industry 4.0, quality management and TQM world: a systematic literature review and a proposed agenda for future research. TQM J. 2020;32(4):603‐616.
[3] RatoTJ, ReisMS. An integrated multiresolution framework for quality prediction and process monitoring in batch processes. J Manuf Syst. 2020;57:198‐216.
[4] ReisMS, GinsG. Industrial process monitoring in the big data/Industry 4.0 era: from detection, to diagnosis, to prognosis. PRO. 2017;5(3):35.
[5] BalamuraliS, JunCH. A new system of skip‐lot sampling plans having a provision for reducing normal inspection. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind. 2011;27(3):348‐363.
[6] GovindarajuK, KisslingR. A combined attributes-variables plan. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind. 2015;31(5):575‐583. · Zbl 07883175
[7] HsuBM, WangTC, ShuMH. Lot‐dependent sampling plans for qualifying long‐term production capability with a one‐sided specification. Comput Ind Eng. 2020;146:106583.
[8] ShuMH, WangTC, HsuBM. An integrated supplier‐buyer lots sampling plan with quality traceability based on process loss restricted consideration. IEEE Access. 2021;9:102687‐102699.
[9] WangTC, WuCW, HsuBM, ShuMH. Process‐capability‐qualified adjustable multiple‐dependent state sampling plan for a long‐term supplier‐buyer relationship. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2021;37(2):583‐597.
[10] HsuBM, ShuMH, WangTC. Variables adjustable multiple dependent state sampling plans with a loss‐based capability index. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;107:2163‐2175.
[11] WangTC, WuCW, ShuMH. A variables‐type multiple‐dependent‐state sampling plan based on the lifetime performance index under a Weibull distribution. Ann Oper Res. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03655-z · Zbl 1482.62119
[12] BalamuraliS, UshaM. Variables quick switching system with double specification limits. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng. 2012;19(2):1250008.
[13] SoundararajanV, ArumainayagamSD. Quick switching system for costly and destructive testing. Sankhyā Ind J Stat. 1992;54(1):1‐12. · Zbl 0781.62159
[14] SoundararajanV, PalanivelM. Quick switching single sampling system indexed by AQL and AOQL. J Appl Stat. 2000;27(6):771‐778.
[15] BalamuraliS, UshaM. Designing of variables quick switching sampling system by considering process loss functions. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2016;46(5):2299‐2314. · Zbl 1365.62482
[16] LiuSW, WuCW. A quick switching sampling system by variables for controlling lot fraction nonconforming. Int J Prod Res. 2016;54(6):1839‐1849.
[17] WuCW, LeeAHI, LiuSW, ShihMH. Capability‐based quick switching sampling system for lot disposition. App Math Model. 2017;52:131‐144. · Zbl 1480.62251
[18] BalamuraliS, UshaM. Developing and designing of an efficient variables sampling system based on the process capability index. J Stat Comput Simul. 2017;87(7):1401‐1415. · Zbl 07192008
[19] BalamuraliS, UshaM. Determination of an efficient variables sampling system based on the Taguchi process capability index. J Oper Res Soc. 2019;70(3):420‐432.
[20] WuCW, LiuSW, ChenJT, LinJJ. Design and construction of a variables switch‐based sampling system for product acceptance determination. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;101:2643‐2652.
[21] ShuMH, WuCW, HsuBM, WangTC. Lifetime performance‐qualified sampling system under a Weibull distribution with failure‐censoring. Qual Eng. 2021;33(3):404‐416.
[22] NadiAA, GildehBS, AfshariR. Optimal design of overall yield‐based variable repetitive sampling plans for processes with multiple characteristics. App Math Model. 2020;81:194‐210. · Zbl 1481.62046
[23] CollaniEV, GöbRV. Acceptance sampling in modern industrial environments. In: RuggeriF (ed.), KenettR (ed.), FaltinF (ed.), eds. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability. Wiley; 2008;803‐808. doi:10.1002/9781118445112.STAT04217
[24] ZonnenshainA, KenettR. Quality 4.0—the challenging future of quality engineering. Qual Eng. 2020;32(4):614‐626.
[25] ChiariniA, KumarM. Lean six sigma and Industry 4.0 integration for operational excellence: evidence from Italian manufacturing companies. Prod Plan Control. 2020;32(13):1084‐1101.
[26] ShuMH. Manufacturing capability assurance for product with multiple characteristics: a case study applied to low dropout voltage regulator. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract. 2006;13(1):41‐50.
[27] PearnWL, ChengYC. Measuring production yield for processes with multiple characteristics. Int J Prod Res. 2010;48(15):4519‐4536. · Zbl 1197.90163
[28] PearnWL, ShiauJJH, TaiYT, LiMY. Capability assessment for processes with multiple characteristics: a generalization of the popular index Cpk. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2011;27(8):1119‐1129.
[29] PearnWL, WuCH. A close form solution for the product acceptance determination based on the popular index Cpk. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2013;29(5):719‐723.
[30] AslamM, AzamM, JunCH. Various repetitive sampling plans using process capability index of multiple quality characteristics. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind. 2015;31(6):823‐835.
[31] LucaS, VandercappellenJ, ClaesJ. A web‐based tool to design and analyze single‐ and double‐stage acceptance sampling plans. Qual Eng. 2020;32(1):58‐74.
[32] ArnheiterED, MayleyeffJ. The integration of lean management and six sigma. TQM J. 2005;17(1):5‐18.
[33] ShuMH, WuHC. Supplier evaluation and selection based on stochastic dominance: a quality‐based approach. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2014;43(14):2907‐2922. · Zbl 1319.90021
[34] WangTC, HsuBM, ShuMH. An integrated quick‐switch sampling system based on a process capability index for constructing a solid supplier‐buyer relationship. Int J Prod Res. 2021;1‐17. doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1991598
[35] WangTC, ShuMH, HsuBM, HsuCW. Adjustable variables multiple‐dependent‐state sampling plans based on a process capability index. J Oper Res Soc. 2021;1‐14. doi:10.1080/01605682.2021.2007805
[36] BoylesRA. The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol. 1991;23(1):17‐26.
[37] TangLC, ThanSE. Computing process capability indices for non‐normal data: a review and comparative study. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 1999;15(5):339‐353.
[38] ChenP, WangBX, YeZS. Yield‐based process capability indices for nonnormal continuous data. J Qual Technol. 2019;51(2):171‐180.
[39] ChingWK, NgMK. Markov Chains: Models, Algorithms and Applications. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc; 2006. · Zbl 1089.60003
[40] JohnsonSG. The NLopt Nonlinear‐Optimization Package. 2018. http://ab‐initio.mit.edu/nlopt
[41] R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. http://www.R‐project.org/
[42] PowellMJD. Direct search algorithms for optimization calculations. Acta Numer. 1998;7:287‐336. · Zbl 0911.65050
[43] RStudio Inc. Shiny: easy web applications in R; 2020. http://shiny.rstudio.com
[44] MichaelM. Cloud Computing: Web‐Based Applications that Change the Way You Work and Collaborate Online. Que Publishing; 2008.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.