Disturbance observer-based PID synchronization control of complex networks with probabilistic interval time-varying delays and multiple disturbances. (English) Zbl 07874703
Summary: In this article, the disturbance observer-based proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control protocol is investigated for synchronization of complex networks with probabilistic interval time-varying delays and multiple disturbances. For the sake of reducing conservatism, a method of probabilistic interval time-varying delay is proposed by introducing two certain intervals with known probability distributions. Moreover, two different disturbances are taken into account. One of the disturbances is produced by an exogenous system which acts through the input channel, while the other is usual norm-bounded disturbance. Simultaneously, a disturbance observer is designed to estimate and compensate the disturbance generated by the exogenous system. By constructing an appropriate Lyapunov-Krasovskii function, a sufficient criterion is obtained to ensure both the exponential synchronization and prescribed \(H_\infty\) performance index. Finally, the simulation examples are employed to demonstrate the validity of the theoretical results.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
MSC:
| 93-XX | Systems theory; control |
Keywords:
\(H_\infty\) control; disturbance observer; PID control; probabilistic interval time-varying delays; synchronizationReferences:
| [1] | SohH, LimS, ZhangT, FuX, LeeGKK. Weighted complex network analysis of travel routes on the singapore public transportation system. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2010;389(24):5852‐5863. |
| [2] | XiaM, HeY. Magnetic resonance imaging and graph theoretical analysis of complex brain networks in neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain Connect. 2011;1(5):349‐365. |
| [3] | SongDS, JeongDG. Development of hair remove laser equipment using qcw method. J Adv Informat Technol Convergence. 2014;4(1):29‐36. |
| [4] | JinXZ, HeYG, WangD. Adaptive finite‐time synchronization of a class of pinned and adjustable complex networks. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;85(3):1393‐1403. · Zbl 1349.34206 |
| [5] | SuoJ, WangZ, ShenB. Pinning synchronization control for a class of discrete‐time switched stochastic complex networks under event‐triggered mechanism. Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Syst. 2020;37:100886. · Zbl 1478.93418 |
| [6] | GuoR, XuS, GuoJ. Sliding mode synchronization control of complex valued inertial neural networks with leakage delay and time varying delays. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2023;53(2):1095‐1103. |
| [7] | WangJA, WenXY. Pinning exponential synchronization of nonlinearly coupled neural networks with mixed delays via intermittent control. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2018;16:1558‐1568. |
| [8] | WuJ, PengC. Observer‐Based adaptive event‐triggered PID control for networked systems under aperiodic DoS attacks. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2022;32(5):2536‐2550. · Zbl 1527.93228 |
| [9] | ZhaoD, WangZ, HoDWC, WeiG. Observer‐based PID security control for discrete time‐delay systems under cyber‐attacks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(6):3926‐3938. |
| [10] | ZhaoD, WangZ, WeiG, HanQ. A dynamic event‐triggered approach to observer‐based PID security control subject to deception attacks. Automatica. 2020;120:109128. · Zbl 1448.93219 |
| [11] | GuH, LiuP, LüJ, LinZ. PID control for synchronization of complex dynamical networks with directed topologies. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021;51(3):1334‐1346. |
| [12] | ZhaoL, WenS, XuM, ShiK, ZhuS, HuangT. PID control for output synchronization of multiple output coupled complex networks. IEEE Trans Network Sci Eng. 2022;9(3):1553‐1566. |
| [13] | WangJL, ZhaoLH. PD and PI control for passivity and synchronization of coupled neural networks with multi‐weights. IEEE Trans Network Sci Eng. 2021;8(1):790‐802. |
| [14] | LiuQ, WangL, LiaoX. Stability analysis of swarms with interaction time delays. Inf Sci. 2012;192:244‐254. · Zbl 1248.68504 |
| [15] | LinA, LiuKKL, BartschRP, IvanovPC. Delay‐Correlation landscape reveals characteristic time delays of brain rhythms and heart interactions. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374(2067):20150182. |
| [16] | ZhangJ, WeiG, LiuS, DingD. PD‐type [( {l}_2-{l}_{\infty } \]\) intermittent pinning synchronization control of discrete time‐delay nonlinear dynamical networks. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2020;18:2027‐2037. |
| [17] | GuH, LüJ, LinZ. On PID control for synchronization of complex dynamical network with delayed nodes. Sci China Technol Sci. 2019;62:1412‐1422. |
| [18] | ZhuXL, YangGH. Jensen integral inequality approach to stability analysis of continuous‐time systems with time‐varying delay. IET Control Theory Appl. 2008;2(6):524‐534. |
| [19] | WuM, HeY, SheJH, LiuGP. Delay‐dependent criteria for robust stability of time‐varying delay systems. Automatica. 2004;40(8):1435‐1439. · Zbl 1059.93108 |
| [20] | YueD, TianE, ZhangY, PengC. Delay‐Distribution‐Dependent stability and stabilization of T‐S fuzzy systems with probabilistic interval delay. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2009;39(2):503‐516. |
| [21] | LiH, WangWK, TangY. Global synchronization stability for stochastic complex dynamical networks with probabilistic interval time‐varying delays. J Optim Theory Appl. 2012;152:496‐516. · Zbl 1252.90079 |
| [22] | YinZ, JiangX, WangF. Stability Criteria for Systems with Multiple Probabilistic Intervals Time‐varying Delay. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2020;18:877‐885. |
| [23] | YaoX, GuoL. Composite anti‐disturbance control for Markovian jump nonlinear systems via disturbance observer. Automatica. 2013;49(8):2538‐2545. · Zbl 1364.93102 |
| [24] | WeiX, GuoL. Composite disturbance‐observer‐based control and [( {H}_{\infty } \]\) control for complex continuous models. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2010;20(1):106‐118. · Zbl 1191.93014 |
| [25] | ShenM, ZhangH, NguangSK, AhnCK. [( {H}_{\infty } \]\) output anti‐disturbance control of stochastic Markov jump systems with multiple disturbances. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(12):7633‐7643. |
| [26] | KaviarasanB, KwonOM, ParkMJ, SakthivelR. Composite synchronization control for delayed coupling complex dynamical networks via a disturbance observer‐based method. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;99:1601‐1619. · Zbl 1459.93050 |
| [27] | LiB, WangZ, MaL. An event‐triggered pinning control approach to synchronization of discrete‐time stochastic complex dynamical networks. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst. 2018;29(12):5812‐5822. |
| [28] | YangD, LiX, SongS. Finite‐time synchronization for delayed complex dynamical networks with synchronizing or desynchronizing impulses. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst. 2022;33(2):736‐746. |
| [29] | LiQ, WangZ, ShengW, Alsaadi FawazE, Alsaadi FuadE. Dynamic event‐triggered mechanism for [( {H}_{\infty } \]\) non‐fragile state estimation of complex networks under randomly occurring sensor saturations. Inf Sci. 2020;509:304‐316. · Zbl 1470.93099 |
| [30] | ZhangD, YuL, WangQG, OngCJ, WuZG. Exponetial [( {H}_{\infty } \]\) filtering for discrete‐time switched singular systems with time‐varying delays. J Franklin Inst. 2012;349(7):2323‐2342. · Zbl 1287.93099 |
| [31] | WangY, ZouL, ZhaoZ, BaiX. [( {H}_{\infty } \]\) fuzzy PID control for discrete time‐delayed T‐S fuzzy systems. Neurocomputing. 2019;332(7):91‐99. |
| [32] | ShiCX, YangGH, LiXJ. Event‐triggered output feedback synchronization control of complex dynamical networks. Neurocomputing. 2018;275:29‐39. |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
