×

Uncertainty quantification by optimal spline dimensional decomposition. (English) Zbl 07863918

Summary: An optimal version of spline dimensional decomposition (SDD) is unveiled for general high-dimensional uncertainty quantification analysis of complex systems subject to independent but otherwise arbitrary probability measures of input random variables. The resulting method involves optimally derived knot vectors of basis splines (B-splines) in some or all coordinate directions, whitening transformation producing measure-consistent orthonormalized B-splines equipped with optimal knots, and Fourier-spline expansion of a general high-dimensional output function of interest. In contrast to standard SDD, there is no need to select the knot vectors uniformly or intuitively. The generation of optimal knot vectors can be viewed as an inexpensive preprocessing step toward creating the optimal SDD. Analytical formulas are proposed to calculate the second-moment properties by the optimal SDD method for a general output random variable in terms of the expansion coefficients involved. It has been shown that the computational complexity of the optimal SDD method is polynomial, as opposed to exponential, thus mitigating the curse of dimensionality by a discernible magnitude. Numerical results affirm that the optimal SDD method developed is more precise than polynomial chaos expansion, sparse-grid quadrature, and the standard SDD method in calculating not only the second-moment statistics, but also the cumulative distribution function of an output random variable. More importantly, the optimal SDD outperforms standard SDD by sustaining nearly identical computational cost.
{© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.}

MSC:

41Axx Approximations and expansions
62-XX Statistics
74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics

Software:

ABAQUS
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] WienerN. The homogeneous chaos. Am J Math. 1938;60(4):897‐936. · JFM 64.0887.02
[2] CameronRH, MartinWT. The orthogonal development of non‐linear functionals in series of Fourier‐Hermite functionals. Ann Math. 1947;48:385‐392. · Zbl 0029.14302
[3] XiuD, KarniadakisGE. The Wiener‐Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2002;24:619‐644. · Zbl 1014.65004
[4] RahmanS. Mathematical properties of polynomial dimensional decomposition. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif. 2018;6:816‐844. · Zbl 1488.62002
[5] RahmanS. A polynomial dimensional decomposition for stochastic computing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2008;76:2091‐2116. · Zbl 1195.74310
[6] YadavV, RahmanS. Adaptive‐sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition for high‐dimensional stochastic computing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2014;274:56‐83. · Zbl 1296.62115
[7] RahmanS. A spline chaos expansion. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif. 2020;8:27‐57. · Zbl 1436.41009
[8] RahmanS, JahanbinR. A spline dimensional decomposition for uncertainty quantification. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif. 2020.
[9] JahanbinR, RahmanS. Stochastic isogeometric analysis in linear elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;364(112928):1‐38. · Zbl 1442.74253
[10] BabuskaI, NobileF, TemponeR. A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2007;45(3):1005‐1034. · Zbl 1151.65008
[11] XiuD, HesthavenJS. High‐order collocation methods for the differential equation with random inputs. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2005;27:1118‐1139. · Zbl 1091.65006
[12] GerstnerT, GriebelM. Numerical integration using sparse grids. Numer Algorithms. 1998;18:209‐232. · Zbl 0921.65022
[13] SmolyakS. Quadrature and interpolation formulas for tensor products of certain classes of functions. Dokl Akad Nauk. 1963;4:240‐243.
[14] RahmanS. Approximation errors in truncated dimensional decompositions. Math Comput. 2014;83(290):2799‐2819. · Zbl 1297.41015
[15] GriebelM, HoltzM. Dimension‐wise integration of high‐dimensional functions with applications to finance. J Complex. 2010;26(5):455‐489. · Zbl 1203.65056
[16] RabitzH, AlisO. General foundations of high dimensional model representations. J Math Chem. 1999;25:197‐233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019188517934 · Zbl 0957.93004 · doi:10.1023/A:1019188517934
[17] LoèveM. Probability Theory. Vol II. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY: Springer; 1977. · Zbl 0359.60001
[18] RahmanS. A Galerkin isogeometric method for Karhunen‐Loève approximation of random fields. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;338:533‐561. · Zbl 1440.65228
[19] JahanbinR, RahmanS. An isogeometric collocation method for efficient random field discretization. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2019;117(3):344‐369. · Zbl 07865106
[20] JahanbinR, RahmanS. Isogeometric methods for Karhunen‐Loève representation of random fields on arbitrary multi‐patch domains. Int J Uncertain Quantif. 2021;11:27‐57. · Zbl 1498.65230
[21] CottrellJA, HughesTJR, BazilevsY. Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. · Zbl 1378.65009
[22] De BoorC. On calculation with B‐splines. J Approx Theory. 1972;6:50‐62. · Zbl 0239.41006
[23] EfronB, SteinC. The jackknife estimate of variance. Ann Stat. 1981;9(3):586‐596. · Zbl 0481.62035
[24] HoeffdingW. A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. Ann Math Stat. 1948;19(3):293‐325. · Zbl 0032.04101
[25] XuH, RahmanS. A generalized dimension‐reduction method for multi‐dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2004;61:1992‐2019. · Zbl 1075.74707
[26] DertimanisV, SpiridonakosM, ChatziE. Data‐driven uncertainty quantification of structural systems via B‐spline expansion. Comput Struct. 2018;207:245‐257.
[27] GenzA, MalikA. An adaptive algorithm for numerical integration over an \(n\)‐dimensional rectangular region. J Comput Appl Math. 1980;6:295‐302. · Zbl 0443.65009
[28] Airbuswww.airbus.com. Accessed October 12, 2020.
[29] CullumJK, WilloughbyRA. Lanczos Algorithms for Large Symmetric Eigenvalue Computations: Theory. Classics in Applied Mathematics. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2002. · Zbl 1013.65033
[30] ABAQUS Analysis user’s manual standard, version 6.12; 2012; Dassault Systems Simulia Corporation.
[31] CoxMG. The numerical evaluation of B‐splines. J Inst Math Appl. 1972;10:134‐149. · Zbl 0252.65007
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.