×

On the reliability estimation of stochastic binary systems. (English) Zbl 07771174

Summary: A stochastic binary system (SBS) is a multicomponent on-off system subject to random independent failures on its components. After potential failures, the state of the subsystem is ruled by a logical function (called structure function) that determines whether the system is operational or not. A SBS serves as a natural generalization of network reliability analysis, where the goal is to find the probability of correct operation of the system (in terms of connectivity, network diameter, or different measures of success). A particular subclass of interest is stochastic monotone binary systems (SMBS), which are characterized by nondecreasing structure. We explore the combinatorics of SBS, which provide building blocks for system reliability estimation, looking at minimal nonoperational subsystems, called mincuts. One key concept to understand the underlying combinatorics of SBS is duality. As methods for exact evaluation take exponential time, we discuss the use of Monte Carlo algorithms. In particular, we discuss the \(F\)-Monte Carlo method for estimating the reliability polynomial for homogeneous SBS, the recursive variance reduction for SMBS, which builds upon the efficient determination of mincuts, and three additional methods that combine in different ways the well-known techniques of permutation Monte Carlo and splitting. These last three methods are based on a stochastic process called the creation process, a temporal evolution of the SBS which is static by definition. All the methods are compared using different topologies, showing large efficiency gains over the basic Monte Carlo scheme.
{© 2021 The Authors. International Transactions in Operational Research © 2021 International Federation of Operational Research Societies}

MSC:

90-XX Operations research, mathematical programming

Software:

RESTART

References:

[1] Amrein, M., Künsch, H.R., 2011. A variant of importance splitting for rare event estimation: fixed number of successes. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation21, 2, 13:1-13:20. · Zbl 1490.62210
[2] Arora, S., Barak, B., 2009. Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. · Zbl 1193.68112
[3] Balázs, M., 2005. Sum of independent exponentials. Online notes. Available at https://people.maths.bris.ac.uk/ mb13434/sumexp.pdf.
[4] Ball, M.O., 1980. Complexity of network reliability computations. Networks10, 2, 153-165. · Zbl 0443.90038
[5] Ball, M.O., 1986. Computational complexity of network reliability analysis: an overview. IEEE Transactions on Reliability35, 3, 230-239. · Zbl 0602.90061
[6] Botev, Z., L’Ecuyer, P., Tuffin, B., 2018. Reliability estimation for networks with minimal flow demand and random link capacities. pp. 1-18.
[7] Botev, Z.I., Kroese, D.P., 2012. Efficient Monte Carlo simulation via the generalized splitting method. Statistics and Computing22, 1, 1-16. · Zbl 1322.65002
[8] Botev, Z.I., L’Ecuyer, P., Simard, R., Tuffin, B., 2016. Static network reliability estimation under the Marshall-Olkin copula. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation26, 2, 14. · Zbl 1369.90057
[9] Canale, E., Cancela, H., Piccini, J., Robledo, F., Romero, P., Rubino, G., Sartor, P., 2015a. Recursive variance reduction method in stochastic monotone binary systems. In Rak, J (ed.) (ed.) 7th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 135-141.
[10] Canale, E., Cancela, H., Robledo, F., Romero, P., Sartor, P., 2015b. Diameter constrained reliability: complexity, distinguished topologies and asymptotic behavior. Networks66, 4, 296-305. · Zbl 1386.05182
[11] Canale, E., Cancela, H., Robledo, F., Romero, P., Sartor, P., 2015c. Full complexity analysis of the diameter‐constrained reliability. International Transactions in Operational Research22, 5, 811-821. · Zbl 1338.90425
[12] Canale, E., Cancela, H., Robledo, F., Rubino, G., Sartor, P., 2013. On computing the 2‐diameter ‐constrained k‐reliability of networks. International Transactions in Operational Research20, 1, 49-58. · Zbl 1263.90018
[13] Canale, E., Robledo, F., Romero, P., Sartor, P., 2014. Monte Carlo methods in diameter‐constrained reliability. Optical Switching and Networking14, Part 2, 134-148. Special issue on RNDM 2013.
[14] Cancela, H., El Khadiri, M., 1995. A recursive variance‐reduction algorithm for estimating communication‐network reliability. IEEE Transactions on Reliability44, 4, 595-602.
[15] Cancela, H., Ferreira, G., Guerberoff, G., Robledo, F., Romero, P., 2018. Building reliability bounds in stochastic binary systems. In 2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1-7.
[16] Cancela, H., Khadiri, M.E., 2003. The recursive variance‐reduction simulation algorithm for network reliability evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability52, 2, 207-212.
[17] Cancela, H., Khadiri, M.E., Rubino, G., 2012. A new simulation method based on the RVR principle for the rare event network reliability problem. Annals of Operations Research196, 1, 111-136. · Zbl 1251.90078
[18] Cancela, H., Murray, L., Rubino, G., 2019. Efficient estimation of stochastic flow network reliability. IEEE Transactions on Reliability68, 3, 954-970.
[19] Cancela, H., Robledo, F., Rubino, G., Sartor, P., 2014. Efficient estimation of distance‐dependent metrics in edge‐failing networks. International Transactions in Operational Research21, 2, 199-213. · Zbl 1291.90050
[20] Cancela, H., Urquhart, M., 2002. RVR simulation techniques for residual connectedness network reliability evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Computers51, 4, 439-443.
[21] Colbourn, C.J., 1999. Reliability issues in telecommunications network planning. In Sansò, B. (ed.), Soriano, P. (ed.) (eds) Telecommunications Network Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 135-146.
[22] Cook, S.A., 1971. The complexity of theorem‐proving procedures. In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 151-158. · Zbl 0253.68020
[23] Dash, R., Barpanda, N., Tripathy, P., Tripathy, C., 2012. Network reliability optimization problem of interconnection network under node‐edge failure model. Applied Soft Computing12, 8, 2322-2328.
[24] Dharmaraja, S., Vinayak, R., Trivedi, K.S., 2016. Reliability and survivability of vehicular ad hoc networks: An analytical approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety153, 28-38.
[25] Easton, M., Wong, C., 1980. Sequential destruction method for Monte Carlo evaluation of system reliability. IEEE Transactions on ReliabilityR-29, 1, 27-32. · Zbl 0426.60080
[26] Elperin, T., Gertsbakh, I.B., Lomonosov, M., 1991. Estimation of network reliability using graph evolution models. IEEE Transactions on Reliability40, 5, 572-581. · Zbl 0739.90023
[27] Endharta, A., Yun, W., Ko, Y., 2018. Reliability evaluation of circular k‐out‐of‐n: G balanced systems through minimal path sets. Reliability Engineering and System Safety180, 226-236.
[28] Fernandez, M., Williams, S., 2010. Closed‐form expression for the Poisson‐binomial probability density function. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems46, 2, 803-817.
[29] Fishman, G., 1996. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 0859.65001
[30] Garvels, M.J.J., 2000. The splitting method in rare event simulation. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Mathematical Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
[31] Gertsbakh, I., Neuman, E., Vaisman, R., 2015. Monte Carlo for estimating exponential convolution. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation44, 10, 2696-2704. · Zbl 1474.65006
[32] Gertsbakh, I., Rubinstein, R., Shpungin, Y., Vaisman, R., 2014a. Permutational methods for performance analysis of stochastic flow networks. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences28, 1, 21-38. · Zbl 1302.90031
[33] Gertsbakh, I.B., Shpungin, Y., 2009. Models of Network Reliability: Analysis, Combinatorics, and Monte Carlo (1st edn.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
[34] Gertsbakh, I.B., Shpungin, Y., Vaisman, R., 2014b. Ternary Networks—Reliability and Monte Carlo. Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 1398.90005
[35] Gertsbakh, I.B., Shpungin, Y., Vaisman, R., 2016. D‐spectrum and reliability of a binary system with ternary components. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences30, 1, 25-39. · Zbl 1370.60150
[36] Glasserman, P., Heidelberger, P., Shahabuddin, P., Zajic, T., 1996. Splitting for rare event simulation: analysis of simple cases. In Charnes, J.M. (ed.), Morrice, D. J. (ed.), Brunner, D.T. (ed.), Swain, J. J. (ed.) (eds) Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Winter Simulation (WSC 1996), Coronado, CA, December 8-11, 1996. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp. 302-308.
[37] Goldbeck, N., Angeloudis, P., Ochieng, W.Y., 2019. Resilience assessment for interdependent urban infrastructure systems using dynamic network flow models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety188, 62-79.
[38] Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., Rosenheim, N., 2019. Integration of physical infrastructure and social systems in communities’ reliability and resilience analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety185, 476-492.
[39] Johansson, J., Hassel, H., Zio, E., 2013. Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: comparing two approaches in the context of power systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety120, 27-38.
[40] Karp, R.M., 1972. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In Miller, R.E. (ed.), Thatcher, J.W. (ed.) (eds), Complexity of Computer Computations. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 85-103. · Zbl 1467.68065
[41] Kobayashi, K., Morohosi, H., Oyama, T., 2009. Applying path‐counting methods for measuring the robustness of the network‐structured system. International Transactions in Operational Research16, 3, 371-389. · Zbl 1171.90346
[42] L’Ecuyer, P., Demers, V., Tuffin, B., 2007. Rare events, splitting, and quasi‐Monte Carlo. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation17, 2, pp. 9-es. · Zbl 1281.62085
[43] L’Ecuyer, P., Le Gland, F., Lezaud, P., Tuffin, B., 2009. Splitting techniques. In Rubino, G. (ed.), Tuffin, B. (ed.) (eds) Rare Event Simulation Using Monte Carlo Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, chapter 3, pp. 39-61. · Zbl 1168.65309
[44] L’Ecuyer, P., Rubino, G., Saggadi, S., Tuffin, B., 2011. Approximate zero‐variance importance sampling for statistic network reliability estimation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability60, 3, 590-604.
[45] Li, J., Dueñas‐Osorio, L., Chen, C., Shi, C., 2016. Connectivity reliability and topological controllability of infrastructure networks: a comparative assessment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety156, 24-33.
[46] Macchi, M., Garetti, M., Centrone, D., Fumagalli, L., Pavirani, G.P., 2012. Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety104, 71-83.
[47] Masri, H., Krichen, S., Guitouni, A., 2019. Metaheuristics for solving the biobjective single‐path multicommodity communication flow problem. International Transactions in Operational Research26, 2, 589-614. · Zbl 07770940
[48] Muriel‐Villegas, J.E., Alvarez‐Uribe, K.C., Patiño‐Rodríguez, C.E., Villegas, J.G., 2016. Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards—insights from a Colombian case. Reliability Engineering & System Safety152, 151-165.
[49] Murray, L., Cancela, H., Rubino, G., 2013. A splitting algorithm for network reliability. IIE Transactions45, 2, 177-189.
[50] Palacio, J., Patino, C., Carazas, F., Souza, G., 2009. Application of Markovian processes for the risk‐based decision making. In 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1279-1284.
[51] Pérez‐Rosés, H., 2018. Sixty years of network reliability. Mathematics in Computer Science12, 3, 275-293. · Zbl 1432.68045
[52] Perman, M., Senegacnik, A., Tuma, M., 1997. Semi‐Markov models with an application to power‐plant reliability analysis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability46, 4, 526-532.
[53] Petingi, L., Rodríguez, J., 2001. Reliability of networks with delay constraints. In Congressus Numerantium, Vol. 152. Utilitas Mathematica, Winnipeg, pp. 117-123. · Zbl 0999.68021
[54] Provan, S.J., Ball, M.O., 1983. The complexity of counting cuts and of computing the probability that a graph is connected. SIAM Journal on Computing12, 4, 777-788. · Zbl 0524.68041
[55] Raad, D., Sinske, A., Van Vuuren, J., 2009. Robust multi‐objective optimization for water distribution system design using a meta‐metaheuristic. International Transactions in Operational Research16, 5, 595-626. · Zbl 1187.90077
[56] Rath, S., Gendreau, M., Gutjahr, W.J., 2016. Bi‐objective stochastic programming models for determining depot locations in disaster relief operations. International Transactions in Operational Research23, 6, 997-1023. · Zbl 1348.90508
[57] Romero, P., 2016. Duality in stochastic binary systems. In 2016 8th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 85-91.
[58] Romero, P., 2019. Challenges in stochastic binary systems. In 2019 11th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1-8.
[59] Rosenthal, A., 1977. Computing the reliability of complex networks. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics32, 2, 384-393. · Zbl 0379.90048
[60] Rubino, G., Tuffin, B., 2009. Rare Event Simulation Using Monte Carlo Methods. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. · Zbl 1159.65003
[61] Saling, K.G., White Jr, K.P., 2013. Integrating probabilistic design and rare‐event simulation into the requirements engineering process for high‐reliability systems. International Transactions in Operational Research20, 4, 515-531. · Zbl 1291.90081
[62] Schäfer, L., García, S., Srithammavanh, V., 2018. Simplification of inclusion‐exclusion on intersections of unions with application to network systems reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety173, 23-33.
[63] Stoer, M., 1992. Design of Survivable Networks. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1531. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin. · Zbl 0766.90063
[64] Tien, I., Kiureghian, A.D., 2016. Algorithms for Bayesian network modeling and reliability assessment of infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety156, 134-147.
[65] Villén‐Altamirano, M., Villén‐Altamirano, J., 1991. RESTART: a method for accelerating rare events simulations. In Proceedings of the 13th International Teletraffic Congress. North‐Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 71-76. · Zbl 0729.90894
[66] Villén‐Altamirano, M., Villén‐Altamirano, J., 2002. Analysis of RESTART simulation: Theoretical basis and sensitivity study. European Transactions on Telecommunications13, 4, 373-385.
[67] Wang, G., Peng, R., Xing, L., 2018. Reliability evaluation of unrepairable k‐out‐of‐n: G systems with phased‐mission requirements based on record values. Reliability Engineering and System Safety178, 191-197.
[68] Wu, B., Maya, B., Limnios, N., 2020. Using semi‐Markov chains to solve semi‐Markov processes. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability. https://doi.10.1007/s11009‐020‐09820‐y. · Zbl 1478.60242
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.