×

Solving a harvest scheduling optimization problem with constraints on clearcut area and clearcut proximity. (English) Zbl 07745351

Summary: This study aims at solving a harvesting scheduling optimization problem with constraints on the clearcut area with additional constraints on clearcut proximity. The objective function is defined as the net present value generated by harvesting discounted by a penalty for each clearcut. This problem arises to reduce the negative environmental impact of excessive harvesting. We propose the connected-bucket model, the so-called bucket model with additional constraints on bucket connectivity and two definitions of stand adjacency, and a Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition. The decomposed model is solved by branch-and-price and the connected-bucket model by a general-purpose mixed integer programming solver (CPLEX). We compare the quality of the solutions obtained with both approaches for real instances. The branch-and-price approach found better solutions for the majority of the instances.
{© 2022 The Authors. International Transactions in Operational Research © 2022 International Federation of Operational Research Societies.}

MSC:

90-XX Operations research, mathematical programming

Software:

SearchCol; CPLEX
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Alvelos, F., deSousa, A., Santos, D., 2013. Combining column generation and metaheuristics. In Hybrid Metaheuristics. Springer, Berlin, pp. 285-334.
[2] Borges, P., Martins, I., Bergseng, E., Eid, T., Gobakken, T., 2015. Effects of site productivity on forest harvest scheduling subject to green‐up and maximum area restrictions. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research31, 5, 1-34.
[3] Constantino, M., Martins, I., 2018. Branch‐and‐cut for the forest harvest scheduling subject to clearcut and core area constraints. European Journal of Operational Research265, 2, 723-734. · Zbl 1374.90435
[4] Constantino, M., Martins, I., Borges, J.G., 2008. A new mixed integer programming model for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions. Operations Research56, 3, 542-551. · Zbl 1167.91401
[5] Crowe, K., Nelson, J., Boyland, M., 2003. Solving the area‐restricted harvest‐scheduling model using the branch‐and‐bound algorithm. Canadian Journal of Forest Research33, 9, 1804-1814.
[6] Epstein, R., Goycoolea, M., Murray, A., Weintraub, A., 2003. An adjacency‐modeling problem based on constructing harvesting areas. In Arthaud, G.J. (ed.), Barrett, T.M. (ed.) (eds) Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 279-289.
[7] Fenton, E., Krul, L., Ozinga, S., Wainwright, R., 2008. Funding forests into the future? How the European Fund for rural development affects Europe’s forests—the case of the Czech Republic. Technical Report, FERN.
[8] Gharbi, C., Rönnqvist, M., Beaudoin, D., Carle, M.A., 2019. A new mixed‐integer programming model for spatial forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research49, 12, 1493-1503.
[9] Goycoolea, M., Murray, A.T., Barahona, F., Epstein, R., Weintraub, A., 2005. Harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions: exploring exact approaches. Operations Research53, 3, 490-500. · Zbl 1165.91444
[10] John, R.S., Tóth, S., 2015. Spatially explicit forest harvest scheduling with difference equations. Annals of Operations Research232, 1, 235-257. · Zbl 1323.90026
[11] Kaya, A., Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Akbulut, R., Ucar, Z., Siry, J., Merry, K., Cieszewski, C., 2016. Optimisation in forest management. Current Forestry Reports2, 1-17.
[12] Martins, I., Alvelos, F., Constantino, M., 2012. A branch‐and‐price approach for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions. Computational Optimization and Applications51, 1, 363-385. · Zbl 1245.90062
[13] Martins, I., Alvelos, F., Constantino, M., 2015. Decompositions and a matheuristic for a forest harvest scheduling problem. In Almeida, J. (ed.), Oliveira, J. (ed.), Pinto, A. (ed.) (eds) Operational Research, Springer, Cham, pp. 237-260.
[14] Martins, I., Constantino, M., Borges, J.G., 1999. Forest management models with spatial structure constraints. Working Paper No. 2/1999, C.I.O., University of Lisbon.
[15] Martins, I., Constantino, M., Borges, J.G., 2005. A column generation approach for solving a non‐temporal forest harvest model with spatial structure constraints. European Journal of Operational Research161, 2, 478-498. · Zbl 1067.90119
[16] McDermott, C., Cashore, B.W., Kanowski, P., 2010. Global Environmental Forest Policies: An International Comparison. Earthscan, London.
[17] McDill, M.E., Rebain, S.A., Braze, J., 2002. Harvest scheduling with area‐based adjacency constraints. Forest Science48, 4, 631-642.
[18] McDill, M.E., Tóth, S.F., St John, R., Braze, J., Rebain, S.A., 2016. Comparing model I and model II formulations of spatially explicit harvest scheduling models with maximum area restrictions. Forest Science62, 1, 28-37.
[19] Murray, A., 1999. Spatial restrictions in harvest scheduling. Forest Science45, 1, 45-52.
[20] Murray, A., Weintraub, A., 2002. Scale and unit specification influences in harvest scheduling with maximum area restrictions. Forest Science48, 4, 779-789.
[21] Tóth, S.F., McDill, M.E., Könnyü, N., George, S., 2013. Testing the use of lazy constraints in solving area‐based adjacency formulations of harvest scheduling models. Forest Science59, 2, 157-176.
[22] Vielma, J.P., Murray, A.T., Ryan, D.M., Weintraub, A., 2007. Improving computational capabilities for addressing volume constraints in forest harvest scheduling problems. European Journal of Operational Research176, 2, 1246-1264. · Zbl 1102.90028
[23] Walters, K., 1996. Defining adjacency and proximity of forest stands for harvest blocking. GIS’96 Symposium, Canada.
[24] Yoshimoto, A., Asante, P., 2018. A new optimization model for spatially constrained harvest scheduling under area restrictions through maximum ow problem. Forest Science64, 4, 392-406.
[25] Yoshimoto, A., Asante, P., 2021. Inter‐temporal aggregation for spatially explicit optimal harvest scheduling under area restrictions. Forest Science67, 5, 587-606.
[26] Yoshimoto, A., Konoshima, M., 2016. Spatially constrained harvest scheduling for multiple harvests by exact formulation with common matrix algebra. Journal of Forest Research21, 1, 15-22.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.