×

Model and efficient algorithm for the portfolio selection problem with real-world constraints under value-at-risk measure. (English) Zbl 07744766

Summary: Value-at-risk (VaR) is a widely acceptable risk measure in finance and particularly, in the portfolio selection problem (PSP). However, due to the non-convexity, its incorporation into an optimization model makes it challenging and difficult to solve. Hence, the development of iterative-based heuristic algorithms (IBHAs) utilizing the problem structure would be valuable. The existing IBHAs are either inefficient in terms of solution quality and running time or are just applicable to solve simple PSPs without any real-world constraint (i.e., cardinality, position size, and transaction cost constraints). To overcome these shortcomings, in this paper, we present a novel IBHA to efficiently solve the PSP with real-world constraints under VaR measure. Our method is based on iterative resolution of two restricted versions of the original model in which some of the binary variables utilized in the formulation of VaR measure are fixed at specific values. Computational experiments over real-world instances indicate that not only the running time of our algorithm is short, but also its solution quality is much better than the existing IBHAs in 97% of instances with an average improvement of about 10%.
{© 2023 The Authors. International Transactions in Operational Research © 2023 International Federation of Operational Research Societies.}

MSC:

90-XX Operations research, mathematical programming

Software:

GAMS; CPLEX
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Chen, L., Korn, R., 2019. Worst‐case portfolio optimization in discrete time. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research90, 2, 197-227. · Zbl 1431.91356
[2] Cornuejols, G., Tütüncü, R., 2006. Optimization Methods in Finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[3] Alfaro Cid, E., Baixauli Soler, J.S., Fernandez‐Blanco, M.O., 2011. Minimizing Value‐at‐Risk in a portfolio optimization problem using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. International Journal of Risk Assessment and management15, 5, 453-477.
[4] Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D., 1999. Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance9, 3, 203-228. · Zbl 0980.91042
[5] Babat, O., Vera, J.C., Zuluaga, L.F., 2018. Computing near‐optimal value‐at‐risk portfolios using integer programming techniques. European Journal of Operational Research266, 1, 304-315. · Zbl 1403.91303
[6] Beder, T.S., 1995. VAR: seductive but dangerous. Financial Analysts Journal51, 5, 12-24.
[7] Benati, S., Rizzi, R., 2007. A mixed integer linear programming formulation of the optimal mean/Value‐at‐Risk portfolio problem. European Journal of Operational Research176, 423-434. · Zbl 1137.91426
[8] Cui, T., Bai, R., Ding, S., Parkes, A.J., Qu, R., He, F., Li, J., 2020. A hybrid combinatorial approach to a two‐stage stochastic portfolio optimization model with uncertain asset prices. Soft Computing24, 2809-2831.
[9] Dallagnol, V.A., vanden Berg, J., Mous, L., 2009. Portfolio management using value at risk: a comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Systems24, 7, 766-792.
[10] Danielsson, J., 2011. Financial Risk Forecasting: The Theory and Practice of Forecasting Market Risk with Implementation in R and Matlab. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
[11] Deng, G.F., Lin, W.T., Lo, C.C., 2012. Markowitz‐based portfolio selection with cardinality constraints using improved particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications39, 4, 4558-4566.
[12] Filippi, C., Guastaroba, G.,Speranza, M.G., 2020. Conditional value‐at‐risk beyond finance: a survey. International Transactions in Operational Research27, 3, 1277-1319. · Zbl 07767485
[13] GAMS Development Corporation, 2019. GAMS-Documentation. Washington: GAMS Development Corporation. Available at:http://www.gams.com
[14] Gilli, M., Këllezi, E., Hysi, H., 2006. A data‐driven optimization heuristic for downside risk minimization. Journal of Risk8, 3, 1-19.
[15] Hooshmand, F., MirHassani, S.A., 2022. Efficient DC algorithm for the index‐tracking problem. In Vasant, P., Zelinka, I., Weber, GW. (eds) Intelligent Computing & Optimization. ICO 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, Cham, pp. 566-576.
[16] ILOG, 2019. ILOG CPLEX 12.9 User’s manual. Available at:http://www.ilog.com/products/cplex.
[17] Jing, K., Xu, F., Li, X., 2022. A bi‐level programming framework for identifying optimal parameters in portfolio selection. International Transactions in Operational Research29, 1, 87-112. · Zbl 07769608
[18] Juszczuk, P., Kaliszewski, I., Miroforidis, J., Podkopaev, D., 2023. Expected mean return—standard deviation efficient frontier approximation with low‐cardinality portfolios in the presence of the risk‐free asset. International Transactions in Operational Research.30, 5, 2395-2414. · Zbl 07744754
[19] Korn, R., Leoff, E., 2019. Multi‐asset worst‐case optimal portfolios. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance22, 4, 1-24. · Zbl 1411.91515
[20] Larsen, N., Mausser, H., 2002. Algorithms for Optimization of Value‐at‐Risk. Springer, Boston, MA. · Zbl 1029.91519
[21] Lwin, K.T., Qu, R., MacCarthy, B.L., 2017. Mean‐VaR portfolio optimization: a nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research260, 2, 751-766. · Zbl 1403.91317
[22] Markowitz, H.M., 1952. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance7, 77-91.
[23] Mausser, H., Romanko, O., 2014. CVaR proxies for minimizing scenario‐based value‐at‐risk. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization10, 4, 1109-1127. · Zbl 1282.91306
[24] Mei, X., Nogales, F.J., 2018. Portfolio selection with proportional transaction costs and predictability. Journal of Banking & Finance94, 131-151.
[25] Mencarelli, L., D’Ambrosio, C., 2018. Complex portfolio selection via convex mixed‐integer quadratic programming: a survey. International Transactions in Operational Research26, 389-414. · Zbl 07770931
[26] MirHassani, S.A., Hooshmand, F., 2019. Methods and Models in Mathematical Programming. Springer, Switzerland.
[27] Mousavi, A., Shen, J., 2022. A penalty decomposition algorithm with greedy improvement for mean‐reverting portfolios with sparsity and volatility constraints. International Transactions in Operational Research.https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13123 · Zbl 07744755 · doi:10.1111/itor.13123
[28] Najafi, A.A., Mushakhian, S., 2015. Multi‐stage stochastic mean-semivariance-CVaR portfolio optimization under transaction costs. Applied Mathematics and Computation256, 445-458. · Zbl 1338.91133
[29] Noyan, N., Rudolf, G., 2013. Optimization with multivariate conditional value‐at‐risk constraints. Operations Research6, 4, 990-1013. · Zbl 1291.91124
[30] Pavlikov, K., Alexander, V., Pasiliao, E.L., 2018. Optimization of Value‐at‐Risk: computational aspects of MIP formulations. Journal of the Operational Research Society69, 5, 676-690.
[31] Ranković, V., Drenovak, M., Stojanovic, B., Kalinić, Z., Arsovski, Z.,2014. The mean‐value at risk static portfolio optimization using genetic algorithm. Computer Science and Information Systems11, 1, 89-109.
[32] Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S., 2002. Conditional value‐at‐risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance26, 7, 1443-1471.
[33] Romanko, O., Mausser, H., 2016. Robust scenario‐based value‐at‐risk optimization. Annals of Operations Research237, 1‐2, 203-218. · Zbl 1341.91131
[34] Sarykalin, S., Serraino, G., Uryasev, S., 2008. Value‐at‐risk vs. conditional value‐at‐risk in risk management and optimization. INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research, 270-294. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/educ.1080.0052
[35] Sehgal, R., Mehra, A., 2019. Enhanced indexing using weighted conditional value at risk. Annals of Operations Research280, 1, 211-240. · Zbl 1430.91091
[36] Sehgal, R., Mehra, A., 2021. Robust reward-risk ratio portfolio optimization. International Transactions in Operational Research28, 4, 2169-2190. · Zbl 07768698
[37] Soares Silva, J.C., deLima Silva, D.F., deAlmeida Filho, A.T., 2022. An enhanced GRASP approach for the index tracking problem. International Transactions in Operational Research.https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13163 · Zbl 07797336 · doi:10.1111/itor.13163
[38] Wozabal, D., 2012. Value‐at‐Risk optimization using the difference of convex algorithm. OR Spectrum34, 4, 861-883. · Zbl 1282.91313
[39] Wu, D., Kwon, R.H., Costa, G., 2017. A constrained cluster‐based approach for tracking the S&P 500 index. International Journal of Production Economics193, 222-243.
[40] Yoshimoto, A., 1996. The mean‐variance approach to portfolio optimization subject to transaction costs. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan39, 1, 99-117. · Zbl 0851.90014
[41] Yu, J.R., Chiou, W.J.P., Lee, W.Y., 2023. An omega portfolio model with dynamic return thresholds. International Transactions in Operational Research.30, 5, 2528-2545. · Zbl 07744760
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.