×

An agent-based model of opinion dynamics with attitude-hiding behaviors. (English) Zbl 07569827

Summary: People might remain silent or give an opinion that is inconsistent with their private convictions when there is a divergence between their own views and the opinion voiced in their surrounding environment. This behavior suppresses the spread of weak opinions and affects the evolution of public opinion. Current opinion dynamics models do not fully consider this practice of attitude hiding. Thus, they are unable to reflect the phenomenon caused by individuals keeping silent. To solve this problem, based on online social networks, we propose an opinion dynamics model considering attitude-hiding behavior. Individuals perceive opinion climate based on feedbacks of expressions in history and use it to assess popularity of their newly opinions. They may keep silent and adjust expressible opinions to show obedience to the opinion climate. Experimental results and comparison with two related models indicate that our model can simulate the evolution of multiple public opinions associated with reality. Consequently, it provides a clearer explanation of the law and cause of the evolution of public opinion from the viewpoint of individuals’ behaviors.

MSC:

82-XX Statistical mechanics, structure of matter

Software:

invGauss
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Xiong, F.; Wang, X.; Pan, S.; Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C., Social recommendation with evolutionary opinion dynamics, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst., 50, 10, 3804-3816 (2018)
[2] Xiong, F.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, J., Modeling and predicting opinion formation with trust propagation in online social networks, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 44, 513-524 (2017) · Zbl 1465.91087
[3] Xiong, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, X., Analysis and application of opinion model with multiple topic interactions, Chaos, 27, 8, Article 083113 pp. (2017)
[4] De, A.; Valera, I.; Ganguly, N.; Bhattacharya, S.; Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Learning and forecasting opinion dynamics in social networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 1993, 397-405 (2016)
[5] Luo, Y.; Li, Y.; Sun, C.; Cheng, C., Adapted Deffuant-Weisbuch model with implicit and explicit opinions, Physica A, 596, Article 127095 pp. (2022) · Zbl 1530.91488
[6] Jedrzejewski, Arkadiusz; Marcjasz, Grzegorz; Nail, Paul R.; Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna, Think then act or act then think?, PLoS One (2017)
[7] Gastner, M. T.; Oborny, B.; Gulyás, M., Consensus time in a voter model with concealed and publicly expressed opinions, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 2018, 6, Article 063401 pp. (2018) · Zbl 1459.91135
[8] Anderson, B.; Ye, M., Recent advances in the modelling and analysis of opinion dynamics on influence networks, Int. J. Automat. Comput., 16, 2, 129-149 (2019)
[9] Duncan, M., Staying silent and speaking out in online comment sections: The influence of spiral of silence and corrective action in reaction to news, Comput. Hum. Behav., 102, 192-205 (2020)
[10] Noelle-Neumann, E., The theory of public opinion: The concept of the spiral of silence, Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc., 14, 1, 256-287 (1991)
[11] Zha, Q.; Kou, G.; Zhang, H.; Liang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, C. C., Opinion dynamics in finance and business: A literature review and research opportunities, Financ. Innov., 6, 1, 1-22 (2020)
[12] Noorazar, H., Recent advances in opinion propagation dynamics: A 2020 survey, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135, 6 (2020)
[13] French, J. R.P., A formal theory of social power, Psychol. Rev., 63, 3, 181-194 (1956)
[14] Noorazar, H.; Vixie, K. R.; Talebanpour, A.; Hu, Y., From classical to modern opinion dynamics, Internat. J. Modern Phys. C, 31, 07, Article 2050101 pp. (2020)
[15] Degroot, M. H., Reaching a consensus, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 69, 345, 118-121 (1974) · Zbl 0282.92011
[16] Friedkin, N. E., Choice shift and group polarization, Am. Sociol. Rev., 856-875 (1999)
[17] Friedkin, N. E.; Johnsen, E. C., Social influence and opinions, J. Math. Sociol., 15, 3-4, 193-206 (1990) · Zbl 0712.92025
[18] Martins, A. C.R., Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems, Internat. J. Modern Phys. C, 19, 04, 617-624 (2008) · Zbl 1152.91423
[19] Sznajd-Weron, K.; Sznajd, J., Opinion evolution in closed community, Internat. J. Modern Phys. C, 11, 06, 1157-1165 (2000)
[20] Galam, S., Minority opinion spreading in random geometry, Eur. Phys. J. B-Condens. Matter Complex Syst., 25, 4, 403-406 (2002)
[21] Deffuant, G.; Neau, D.; Weisbuch, G., Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Adv. Complex Syst., 3, 1, 87-98 (2000)
[22] Hegselmann, R.; Krause, U., Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 5, 3 (2002)
[23] Li, Y.; Kou, G.; Li, G.; Wang, H., Multi-attribute group decision making with opinion dynamics based on social trust network, Inf. Fusion, 75, 102-115 (2021)
[24] Li, K.; Liang, H.; Kou, G.; Dong, Y., Opinion dynamics model based on the cognitive dissonance: An agent-based simulation, Inf. Fusion, 56, 2019, 1-14 (2020)
[25] Myers, D. G., Social Psychology (2013), McGraw-Hill
[26] Aalen, O. O.; Ø, Borgan; Gjessing, H. K., Survival and Event History Analysis: A Process Point of View (2008), Springer Verlag · Zbl 1204.62165
[27] Ghosh, J. K., Survival and event history analysis: A process point of view by Odd O. Aalen, Ørnulf Borgan, Håkon K. Gjessing, Int. Stat. Rev., 77, 3, 463-464 (2010)
[28] I. Valera, M. Gomez-Rodriguez, Modeling adoption and usage of competing products, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2015, pp. 409-418.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.