×

Data envelopment analysis with embedded inputs and outputs. (English) Zbl 1541.90209

Summary: Applications of data envelopment analysis (DEA) often include inputs and outputs that are embedded in some other inputs or outputs. For example, in a school assessment, the sets of students achieving good academic results or students with special needs are subsets of the set of all students. In a hospital application, the set of specific or successful treatments is a subset of all treatments. Similarly, in many applications, labour costs are a part of overall costs. Conventional variable and constant returns-to-scale DEA models cannot incorporate such information. Using such standard DEA models may potentially lead to a situation in which, in the resulting projection of an inefficient decision making unit, the value of an input or output representing the whole set is less than the value of an input or output representing its subset, which is physically impossible. In this paper, we demonstrate how the information about embedded inputs and outputs can be incorporated in the DEA models. We further identify common scenarios in which such information is redundant and makes no difference to the efficiency assessment and scenarios in which such information needs to be incorporated in order to keep the efficient projections consistent with the identified embeddings.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90C08 Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abad, A.; Briec, W., On the axiomatic of pollution-generating technologies: Non-parametric production analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 277, 1, 377-390, 2019 · Zbl 1430.90224 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.027
[2] Afriat, SN, Efficiency estimation of production functions, International Economic Review, 13, 3, 568-598, 1972 · Zbl 0264.90022 · doi:10.2307/2525845
[3] Aparicio, J.; Pastor, JT; Zofio, JL, On the inconsistency of the Malmquist-Luenberger index, European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 3, 738-742, 2013 · Zbl 1317.90186 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.031
[4] Asmild, M.; Paradi, JC; Reese, DN, Theoretical perspectives of trade-off analysis using DEA, Omega, 34, 4, 337-343, 2006 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.002
[5] Banker, RD, Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 1, 35-44, 1984 · Zbl 0538.90030 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(84)90006-7
[6] Banker, RD; Charnes, A.; Cooper, WW, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30, 9, 1078-1092, 1984 · Zbl 0552.90055 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[7] Banker, RD; Thrall, RM, Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 62, 1, 74-84, 1992 · Zbl 0760.90001 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90178-C
[8] Chambers, RG; Chung, Y.; Färe, R., Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98, 2, 351-364, 1998 · Zbl 0909.90040 · doi:10.1023/A:1022637501082
[9] Chambers, RG; Färe, R., A “calculus” for data envelopment analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 3, 169-175, 2008 · doi:10.1007/s11123-008-0104-8
[10] Charnes, A.; Cooper, WW; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 6, 429-444, 1978 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[11] Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis,11(1), 5-42.
[12] Cooper, WW; Pastor, JT; Borras, F.; Aparicio, J.; Pastor, D., BAM: A bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 2, 85-94, 2011 · doi:10.1007/s11123-010-0190-2
[13] Cooper, WW; Seiford, LM; Tone, K., Data envelopment analysis. A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software, 2007, New York: Springer, New York · Zbl 1111.90001 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8
[14] Dakpo, KH; Jeanneaux, P.; Latruffe, L., Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework, European Journal of Operational Research, 250, 2, 347-359, 2016 · Zbl 1346.91176 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.024
[15] Dyson, RG; Allen, R.; Camanho, AS; Podinovski, VV; Sarrico, CS; Shale, EA, Pitfalls and protocols in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 2, 245-259, 2001 · Zbl 0980.90038 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
[16] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Logan, J., The relative efficiency of Illinois electric utilities, Resources and Energy, 5, 4, 349-367, 1983 · doi:10.1016/0165-0572(83)90033-6
[17] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, CAK; Pasurka, C., Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 1, 90-98, 1989 · doi:10.2307/1928055
[18] Färe, R.; Lovell, CAK, Measuring the technical efficiency of production, Journal of Economic Theory, 19, 1, 150-162, 1978 · Zbl 0398.90012 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1
[19] Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
[20] Førsund, FR, Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 55, 3, 157-175, 2021 · doi:10.1007/s11123-021-00599-9
[21] Førsund, FR; Hjalmarsson, L., Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 10, 1023-1038, 2004 · Zbl 1095.90052 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601741
[22] Hadjicostas, P.; Soteriou, AC, One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework, European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 2, 425-449, 2006 · Zbl 1101.90344 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.008
[23] Krivonozhko, VE; Førsund, FR; Lychev, AV, Measurement of returns to scale using non-radial DEA models, European Journal of Operational Research, 232, 3, 664-670, 2014 · Zbl 1305.90228 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.046
[24] Mehdiloo, M.; Podinovski, VV, Selective strong and weak disposability in efficiency analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 3, 1154-1169, 2019 · Zbl 1430.90234 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.064
[25] Mehdiloo, M.; Podinovski, VV, Strong, weak and Farrell efficient frontiers of technologies satisfying different production assumptions, European Journal of Operational Research, 294, 1, 295-311, 2021 · Zbl 1487.90382 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.022
[26] Peyrache, A.; Rose, C.; Sicilia, G., Variable selection in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 282, 2, 644-659, 2020 · Zbl 1430.90346 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.028
[27] Podinovski, VV; Chambers, RG; Atici, KB; Deineko, ID, Marginal values and returns to scale for nonparametric production frontiers, Operations Research, 64, 1, 236-250, 2016 · Zbl 1336.90052 · doi:10.1287/opre.2015.1457
[28] Podinovski, VV; Førsund, FR, Differential characteristics of efficient frontiers in data envelopment analysis, Operations Research, 58, 6, 1743-1754, 2010 · Zbl 1231.90241 · doi:10.1287/opre.1090.0794
[29] Pham, MD; Zelenyuk, V., Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: A new taxonomy of reference technology sets, European Journal of Operational Research, 274, 1, 186-198, 2019 · Zbl 1431.91195 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.019
[30] Sahoo, BK; Tone, K.; Zhu, J., Scale elasticity in non-parametric DEA approach, Data envelopment analysis: A handbook of models and methods, 269-290, 2015, New York: Springer, New York · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7553-9_9
[31] Seiford, LM; Thrall, RM, Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis, Journal of Econometrics, 46, 1-2, 7-38, 1990 · Zbl 0716.90015 · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U
[32] Shephard, R. W. (1974). Indirect production functions. Mathematical Systems in Economics No. 10. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain. · Zbl 0278.90036
[33] Zelenyuk, V., A scale elasticity measure for directional distance function and its dual: Theory and DEA estimation, European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 3, 592-600, 2013 · Zbl 1317.90110 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.012
[34] Zelenyuk, V., Aggregation of inputs and outputs prior to Data Envelopment Analysis under big data, European Journal of Operational Research, 282, 1, 172-187, 2020 · Zbl 1430.90418 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.007
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.