×

The Ricci decomposition of the inertia tensor for a rigid body in arbitrary spatial dimensions. (English) Zbl 1541.70005

Summary: The rotations of rigid bodies in Euclidean space are characterized by their instantaneous angular velocity and angular momentum. In an arbitrary number of spatial dimensions, these quantities are represented by bivectors (antisymmetric rank-2 tensors), and they are related by a rank-4 inertia tensor. Remarkably, this inertia tensor belongs to a well-studied class of algebraic curvature tensors that have the same index symmetries as the Riemann curvature tensor field used in general relativity. Any algebraic curvature tensor can be decomposed into irreducible representations of the orthogonal group via the Ricci decomposition. We calculate the Ricci decomposition of the inertia tensor for a rigid body in any number of dimensions, and we find that (unlike for the Riemann curvature tensor field) its traceless Weyl tensor is always zero, so the inertia tensor is completely characterized by its (rank-2) Ricci contraction. So unlike in general relativity, the traceless Weyl tensor does not cause any qualitatively new phenomenology for rigid-body dynamics in \(n \geq 4\) dimensions.

MSC:

70E15 Free motion of a rigid body
70G45 Differential geometric methods (tensors, connections, symplectic, Poisson, contact, Riemannian, nonholonomic, etc.) for problems in mechanics
53Z05 Applications of differential geometry to physics
15A75 Exterior algebra, Grassmann algebras

Software:

MathOverflow

References:

[1] Thornton, ST; Marion, JB, Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems (2004), Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove
[2] Nakahara, M., Geometry, Topology, and Physics (2003), Abingdon: Graduate Student Series in Physics. Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon · Zbl 1090.53001
[3] Math Overflow: Is there a preferable convention for defining the wedge product? (2011). https://mathoverflow.net/questions/54343/is-there-a-preferable-convention-for-defining-the-wedge-product
[4] Jensen, S., Poling, J.: Teaching rotational physics with bivectors. (2022). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2207.03560
[5] Berrondo, M.; Greenwald, J.; Verhaaren, C., Unifying the inertia and Riemann curvature tensors through geometric algebra, Am. J. Phys., 80, 10, 905-912 (2012) · doi:10.1119/1.4734014
[6] Bini, D., Cherubini, C., Jantzen, R.T., Ruffini, R.: De Rham wave equation for tensor valued \(p\)-forms. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12(08), 1363-1384 (2003). doi:10.1142/S0218271803003785 · Zbl 1079.58505
[7] Besse, AL, Classics in Mathematics (1987), Berlin: Springer, Berlin
[8] Petrov, AZ, The classification of spaces defining gravitational fields, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 32, 1665-1685 (2000) · Zbl 0972.83007 · doi:10.1023/A:1001910908054
[9] Srednicki, M., Quantum Field Theory (2007), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 1113.81002 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813917
[10] Kühnel, W.; Rademacher, HB; Alekseevskiĭ, DV; Baum, H., Conformal transformations of pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Recent Developments in Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry, 261-298 (2008), Helsinki: European Mathematical Society, Helsinki · Zbl 1155.53037 · doi:10.4171/051-1/8
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.