×

3D simulation of complex fractures with a simple mesh. (English) Zbl 1540.74173

Summary: Rock masses are 3D in nature. The contained complex fracture networks pose great difficulty to its computer-aided design (CAD) modeling and bring meshing burdens to classic finite element analysis (FEA). Considering the efficiency of digital images capturing complex geometries, as an extension of the previous 2D work, the 3D implementation of the image-based simulation is carried out in this work. Continuous-discontinuous deformations of complex rock masses are simulated in 3D with a simple structured mesh based on the numerical manifold method (NMM). Characteristics of the developed voxel crack model and its differences with discrete and smeared crack models are summarized. Based on this voxel crack model, the generating algorithm of 3D physical patches to construct the continuous-discontinuous trial function is introduced in detail. In the developed method, the three spatial resolutions, respectively of the image model, integration voxels, and mathematical elements, are independent. These resolutions can be chosen freely by trading off the accuracy need and the computational expenses. Numerical examples investigate the accuracy and convergence of this method. Its 3D simulation capability of complex rock masses is demonstrated by calculating the continuous-discontinuous deformation of El Capitan rock located in the Yosemite National Park with assumed complex fracture networks.
{© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.}

MSC:

74S99 Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
74R10 Brittle fracture
74L10 Soil and rock mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] JingL. A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2003;40(3):283‐353.
[2] WassermannB, KollmannsbergerS, YinS, KudelaL, RankE. Integrating CAD and numerical analysis: ’Dirty geometry’ handling using the finite cell method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;351:808‐835. · Zbl 1441.65024
[3] DüsterA, ParvizianJ, YangZ, RankE. The finite cell method for three‐dimensional problems of solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2008;197(45‐48):3768‐3782. · Zbl 1194.74517
[4] ShiG. Manifold method of material analysis. Transactions of the 9th Army Conference on Applied Mathematics and Computing; 1991:57‐76; Minneapolis, Minnesota.
[5] ShiGH. Modeling rock joints and blocks by manifold method. Proceedings of the 33rd U. S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics; 1992; Santa Fe, New Mexico.
[6] CundallPA, HartRD. Numerical modelling of discontinua. Eng Comput. 1992;9:101‐113.
[7] ShiGH, GoodmanRE. Two dimensional discontinuous deformation analysis. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 1985;9(6):541‐556. · Zbl 0573.73106
[8] ShiG. Discontinuous Deformation Analysis: A New Numerical Model for the Statics and Dynamics of Block Systems. PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley; 1988.
[9] MunjizaA, OwenD, BicanicN. A combined finite‐discrete element method in transient dynamics of fracturing solids. Eng Comput. 1995;12:145‐174. · Zbl 0822.73070
[10] ShiG. Contact theory. Sci China Technol Sci. 2015;58:1450‐1496.
[11] MunjizaA, AndrewsKRF, WhiteJK. Combined single and smeared crack model in combined finite‐discrete element analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1999;44:41‐57. · Zbl 0936.74071
[12] FromentM, RougierE, LarmatC, et al. Lagrangian‐based simulations of hypervelocity impact experiments on mars regolith proxy. Geophys Res Lett. 2020;47:1‐17.
[13] BoyceS, LeiZ, EuserB, et al. Simulation of mixed‐mode fracture using the combined finite-Discrete element method. Comput Part Mech. 2020;7:1047‐1055.
[14] CaldwellWK, EuserB, PleskoCS, et al. Benchmarking numerical methods for impact and cratering applications. Appl Sci. 2021;11:2504.
[15] LeiZ, RougierE, KnightEE, ZangM, MunjizaA. Impact fracture and fragmentation of glass via the 3D combined finite‐discrete element method. Appl Sci. 2021;11:2484.
[16] BelytschkoT, BlackT. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1999;45(5):601‐620. · Zbl 0943.74061
[17] MoesN, DolbowJ, BelytschkoT, NicolasM, JohnD, TedB. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1999;46(1):131‐150. · Zbl 0955.74066
[18] SukumarN, DolbowJE, MoësN. Extended finite element method in computational fracture mechanics: a retrospective examination. Int J Fract. 2015;196(1‐2):189‐206.
[19] DauxC, MoësN, DolbowJ, et al. Arbitrary branched and intersecting cracks with the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2000;48:1741‐1760. · Zbl 0989.74066
[20] RichardsonCL, HegemannJ, SifakisE, HellrungJ, TeranJM. An XFEM method for modelling geometrically elaborate crack.pdf; 2009:1‐41.
[21] MousaviSE, GrinspunE, SukumarN. Harmonic enrichment functions. A unified treatment of multiple, intersecting and branched cracks in the extended finite element method; 2010:1‐32.
[22] MousaviSE, GrinspunE, SukumarN. Higher‐order extended finite elements with harmonic enrichment functions for complex crack problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2011;86(4‐5):560‐574. · Zbl 1216.74027
[23] DuarteC, KimD‐J. Analysis and applications of a generalized finite element method with global‐local enrichment functions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2008;197:487‐504. · Zbl 1169.74597
[24] ZhengH, XuDD. New strategies for some issues of numerical manifold method in simulation of crack propagation. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2014;97:986‐1010. · Zbl 1352.74311
[25] ZhengH, LiuF, DuX. Complementarity problem arising from static growth of multiple cracks and MLS‐based numerical manifold method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2015;295:150‐171. · Zbl 1423.74853
[26] LinJ‐S. A mesh‐based partition of unity method for discontinuity modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2003;192(11):1515‐1532. · Zbl 1031.74052
[27] MaGW, AnXM, ZhangHH, LiLX. Modeling complex crack problems using the numerical manifold method. Int J Fract. 2009;156:21‐35. · Zbl 1273.74461
[28] BelytschkoT, GracieR, VenturaG. A review of extended/generalized finite element methods for material modeling. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2009;17(4):1‐24.
[29] WuJ‐Y. A unified phase‐field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi‐brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids. 2017;103:72‐99.
[30] SunL. Particle Manifold Method (PMM) for Multiscale Continuous‐Discontinuous Analysis. PhD thesis. EPFL; 2012.
[31] SukumarN, MoësN, MoranB, BelytschkoT. Extended finite element method for three‐dimensional crack modelling. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2000;48:1549‐1570. · Zbl 0963.74067
[32] TeradaK, KurumataniM. An integrated procedure for three‐dimensional structural analysis with the finite cover method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2005;63(15):2102‐2123. · Zbl 1134.74415
[33] HeL, MaGW. Development of 3D numerical manifold method. Int J Comput Methods. 2010;7(1):107‐129. · Zbl 1267.74125
[34] YangY, TangX, ZhengH, LiuQ, HeL. Three‐dimensional fracture propagation with numerical manifold method. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2016;72:65‐77. · Zbl 1403.74091
[35] TianR, WenL, WangL. Three‐dimensional improved XFEM (IXFEM) for static crack problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;343:339‐367. · Zbl 1440.74444
[36] MieheC, HofackerM, WelschingerF. A phase field model for rate‐independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199:2765‐2778. · Zbl 1231.74022
[37] MayS, VignolletJ, deBorstR. A numerical assessment of phase‐field models for brittle and cohesive fracture:
[( \varGamma \]\)‐Convergence and stress oscillations. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2015;52:72‐84. · Zbl 1406.74599
[38] MoësP‐EBCN, StolzC. A level set based model for damage growth: The thick level set approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2011;86(3):358‐380. · Zbl 1235.74302
[39] ComiC. Non‐local model with tension and compression damage mechanisms. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2001;20(1):1‐22. · Zbl 0982.74005
[40] PeerlingsRHJ, GeersMGD, BorstRD, BrekelmansWAM. A critical comparison of nonlocal and gradient‐enhanced softening continua; Vol. 38, 2001:7723‐7746. · Zbl 1032.74008
[41] GiovanardiB, ScottiA, FormaggiaL. A hybrid XFEM-Phase field (Xfield ) method for crack propagation in brittle elastic materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;320:396‐420. · Zbl 1439.74350
[42] BadnavaH, MsekhMA, EtemadiE, RabczukT. An h‐adaptive thermo‐mechanical phase field model for fracture. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2018;138(September):31‐47.
[43] JansariC, KannanK, AnnabattulaRK, NatarajanS. Adaptive phase field method for quasi‐static brittle fracture using a recovery based error indicator and quadtree decomposition. Eng Fract Mech. 2019;220:106599.
[44] NagarajaS, ElhaddadM, AmbatiM, KollmannsbergerS, De LorenzisL, RankE. Phase‐field modeling of brittle fracture with multi‐level hp‐FEM and the finite cell method. Comput Mech. 2019;63(6):1283‐1300. · Zbl 1465.74152
[45] GeelenR, PlewsJ, TupekM, DolbowJ. An extended/generalized phase‐field finite element method for crack growth with global‐local enrichment. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2020;121(11):2534‐2557. · Zbl 07841930
[46] ComiC, MarianiS, PeregoU. An extended FE strategy for transition from continuum damage to mode I cohesive crack propagation. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 2007;31(2):213‐238. · Zbl 1108.74052
[47] Tamayo‐MasE, Rodríguez‐FerranA. A medial‐axis‐based model for propagating cracks in a regularised bulk. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2015;101:489‐520. · Zbl 1352.74306
[48] RothS‐NN, LegerP, SoulaimaniA, LégerP, SoulaïmaniA. A combined XFEM‐damage mechanics approach for concrete crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2015;283:923‐955. · Zbl 1423.74064
[49] WangYX, WaismanH. From diffuse damage to sharp cohesive cracks: A coupled XFEM framework for failure analysis of quasi‐brittle materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;299:57‐89. · Zbl 1425.74410
[50] GeelenRJ, LiuY, DolbowJE, Rodríguez‐FerranA. An optimization‐based phase‐field method for continuous‐discontinuous crack propagation. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2018;116(1):1‐20. · Zbl 07865047
[51] Tamayo‐MasE, Feliu‐FabàJ, Casado‐AntolinM, Rodríguez‐FerranA. A continuous‐discontinuous model for crack branching. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2019;120(1):86‐104. · Zbl 07859726
[52] HollisterSJ, KikuchiN. Homogenization theory and digital imaging: A basis for studying the mechanics and design principles of bone tissue. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;43:586‐596.
[53] NguyenT‐TT, YvonnetJ, ZhuQ‐ZZ, BornertM, ChateauC. A phase‐field method for computational modeling of interfacial damage interacting with crack propagation in realistic microstructures obtained by microtomography. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;312:567‐595. · Zbl 1439.74243
[54] YangZJ, LiBB, WuJY. X‐ray computed tomography images based phase‐field modeling of mesoscopic failure in concrete. Eng Fract Mech. 2019;208:151‐170.
[55] SaputraA, TalebiH, TranD, BirkC, SongC. Automatic image‐based stress analysis by the scaled boundary finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2017;109:697‐738. · Zbl 07874320
[56] HeK, SongC, OoiET. A novel scaled boundary finite element formulation with stabilization and its application to image‐based elastoplastic analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2018;115(8):956‐985. · Zbl 07865133
[57] ZanderN, BogT, ElhaddadM, et al. FCMLab: a finite cell research toolbox for MATLAB. Adv Eng Softw. 2014;74:49‐63.
[58] KudelaL, KollmannsbergerS, AlmacU, RankE. Direct structural analysis of domains defined by point clouds. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;358(June):1‐21. · Zbl 1441.74254
[59] WuJ. Image‐based simulation of complex fracture networks by numerical manifold method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2021;122:3100‐3119. · Zbl 07863787
[60] ParvizianJ, DüsterA, RankE. Finite cell method: h‐ and p‐extension for embedded domain problems in solid mechanics. Comput Mech. 2007;41(1):121‐133. · Zbl 1162.74506
[61] SchreyerH, SulskyDL, ZhouSL. Application of a particle‐in‐cell method to solid mechanics. Comput Phys Commun. 1995;87:236‐252. · Zbl 0918.73334
[62] KakourisEG, TriantafyllouSP. Phase‐field material point method for brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2017;112(12):1750‐1776. · Zbl 07867189
[63] HuY, FangY, GeZ, et al. A moving least squares material point method with displacement discontinuity and two‐way rigid body coupling. ACM Trans Graph. 2018;37(4):1‐14.
[64] BelytschkoT, ParimiC, MoesN, et al. Structured extended finite element methods for solids defined by implicit surfaces. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2003;56(4):609‐635. · Zbl 1038.74041
[65] CaiY, YanP. Numerical manifold method with local pixel representation of finite covers for two‐dimensional problems having complex discontinuities. Comput Geotech. 2021;140(August):104459.
[66] DüsterA, RankE. A p‐version finite element approach for two‐ and three‐dimensional problems of the J2 flow theory with non‐linear isotropic hardening. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2002;53(1):49‐63. · Zbl 1112.74509
[67] CollinsBD, SandroneF, GastaldoL, StockGM, JaboyedoffM. Rock strength properties of granitic rocks in Yosemite valley, Yosemite national park, California. US Geolog Surv Data Ser. 2020;2020(1126):1‐158.
[68] ArcGIS. What is a voxel layer?—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation.
[69] de laVargaM, SchaafA, WellmannF. GemPy 1.0: open‐source stochastic geological modeling and inversion. Geosci Model Dev. 2019;12:1‐32.
[70] JingY, ArmstrongRT, MostaghimiP. Image‐based fracture pipe network modelling for prediction of coal permeability. Fuel. 2020;270(February):117447.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.