×

Information disclosure in mitigating moral hazard: an experimental investigation. (English) Zbl 1536.91206

Summary: In a moral hazard framework, an agent considers undertaking a task of uncertain difficulty. An immediate disclosure of the task’s difficulty by the principal convinces the agent to perform only easy tasks. By contrast, information design theory predicts that delayed disclosure can induce the agent to continue working even when the work turns out to be challenging. Our experimental evidence confirms that delayed disclosure outperforms immediate disclosure and no disclosure, as theory predicts, but only if immediate disclosure is not available. However, when the principal is faced with the choice between the two policies and chooses delayed disclosure over immediate disclosure, the superiority of delayed disclosure disappears due to the agent’s intention-based reciprocity towards the principal.

MSC:

91B43 Principal-agent models
91B41 Contract theory (moral hazard, adverse selection)
91B44 Economics of information
91-05 Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance

Software:

Z-Tree
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Alonso, R.; Camara, O., Persuading voters, Am. Econ. Rev., 106, 3590-3605, 2016
[2] Aristidou, A.; Coricelli, G.; Vostroknutov, A., Incentives or persuasion? An experimental investigation, 2019, Working paper
[3] Au, P. H.; Li, K. K., Bayesian persuasion and reciprocity: theory and experiment, 2018, Working paper
[4] Benndorf, V.; Kübler, D.; Normann, H. T., Privacy concerns, voluntary disclosure of information, and unraveling: an experiment, Eur. Econ. Rev., 75, 43-59, 2015
[5] Bergemann, D.; Morris, S., Information design, Bayesian persuasion, and Bayes correlated equilibrium, Am. Econ. Rev., 106, 586-591, 2016
[6] Bergemann, D.; Morris, S., Information design: a unified perspective, J. Econ. Lit., 57, 44-95, 2019
[7] Charness, G.; Dufwenberg, M., Promises and partnership, Econometrica, 74, 6, 1579-1601, 2006 · Zbl 1187.91033
[8] Dickhaut, J.; Ledyard, M.; Mukherji, A.; Sapra, H., Information management and valuation: an experimental investigation, Games Econ. Behav., 44, 1, 26-53, 2003 · Zbl 1062.91544
[9] Ely, J.; Szydlowski, M., Moving the goalposts, J. Polit. Econ., 128, 468-506, 2020
[10] Fehr, E.; Schmidt, K. M., A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, Q. J. Econ., 114, 3, 817-868, 1999 · Zbl 0944.91022
[11] Feltovich, N.; Giovannoni, F., Selection vs. accountability: an experimental investigation of campaign promises in a moral-hazard environment, J. Public Econ., 126, 39-51, 2015
[12] Fischbacher, U., z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Exp. Econ., 10, 171-178, 2007
[13] Forsythe, R.; Isaac, R. M.; Palfrey, T. R., Theories and tests of “blind bidding” in sealed-bid auctions, Rand J. Econ., 214-238, 1989
[14] Forsythe, R.; Lundholm, R.; Rietz, T., Cheap talk, fraud, and adverse selection in financial markets: some experimental evidence, Rev. Financ. Stud., 12, 3, 481-518, 1999
[15] Frechette, G.; Lizzeri, A.; Perego, J., Rules and commitment in communication: an experimental analysis, 2020, Working paper
[16] Grossman, S.; Hart, O., Disclosure laws and takeover bids, J. Finance, 35, 2, 323-334, 1980
[17] Grossman, S.; Hart, O., The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration, J. Polit. Econ., 94, 691-719, 1986
[18] Hagenbach, J.; Perez-Richet, E., Communication with evidence in the lab, Games Econ. Behav., 112, 139-165, 2018 · Zbl 1419.91189
[19] Hart, O.; Moore, J., Property rights and the nature of the firm, J. Polit. Econ., 98, 1119-1158, 1990
[20] Hoppe, E. I.; Schmitz, P. W., Hidden action and outcome contractibility: an experimental test of moral hazard theory, Games Econ. Behav., 109, 544-564, 2018 · Zbl 1390.91092
[21] Jin, G. Z.; Luca, M.; Martin, D., Is no news (perceived as) bad news? An experimental investigation of information disclosure, Am. Econ. J. Microecon., 13, 2, 141-173, 2021
[22] Kamenica, E.; Gentzkow, M., Bayesian persuasion, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 2590-2615, 2011
[23] King, R. R.; Wallin, D. E., Voluntary disclosures when seller’s level of information is unknown, J. Account. Res., 29, 1, 96-108, 1991
[24] Li, Y. X.; Schipper, B. C., Disclosure Under Unawareness: An Experiment, 2018, University of California: University of California Davis
[25] Li, Y. X.; Schipper, B. C., Strategic reasoning in persuasion games: an experiment, Games Econ. Behav., 121, 329-367, 2020 · Zbl 1437.91123
[26] Loewenstein, G. F.; Thompson, L.; Bazerman, M. H., Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 57, 3, 426, 1989
[27] Milgrom, P. R., Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications, Bell J. Econ., 380-391, 1981
[28] Rabin, M., Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, Am. Econ. Rev., 1281-1302, 1993
[29] Sobel, J., Interdependent preferences and reciprocity, J. Econ. Lit., 43, 2, 392-436, 2005
[30] Viscusi, W. K., A note on “lemons” markets with quality certification, Bell J. Econ., 277-279, 1978
[31] Wu, W.; Ye, B., Competition in persuasion: an experiment, 2021, Working paper
[32] Wu, F.; Zheng, J., Double directional persuasion, 2021, Working paper
[33] Xiang, J., Physicians as persuaders: evidence from hospitals in China, 2021, Working paper
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.