×

Coordination efficiency for general two-stage network system. (English) Zbl 1536.90120

Summary: Two-stage network data envelopment analysis (DEA) is widely used to evaluate efficiency of different organizations with multiple operations processes or hierarchical structures. Although existing two-stage network DEA assumes two-stage systems resolve the inherent conflicts between two stages, the coordination effect between the two stages is usually ignored. Recently, the relation of two-stage network DEA to traditional “black box” DEA has been studied from the perspective of system coordination. A coordination efficiency was defined and measured by a DEA-based approach based on simple two-stage network systems. In this paper, we propose an extended DEA-based approach for measuring the coordination efficiency for general two-stage network systems. The paper shows that the coordination efficiency based on the multiplier DEA and envelopment DEA approaches is equivalent to each other under both constant returns to scale (CRS) and variable returns to scale (VRS) assumptions. The proposed approach is verified via two numerical examples finally.

MSC:

90C08 Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.)
90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
90B30 Production models

References:

[1] R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30 (1984) 1078-1092. · Zbl 0552.90055
[2] G.P. Cachon, Supply chain coordination with contracts, in Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Vol. 11. Elsevier (2003) 227-339. · Zbl 1101.90311
[3] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429-444. · Zbl 0416.90080
[4] Y. Chen, L. Liang and F. Yang, A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency. Ann. Oper. Res. 145 (2006) 5-13. · Zbl 1106.90041
[5] Y. Chen, W.D. Cook, N. Li and J. Zhu, Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2009) 1170-1176. · Zbl 1176.90393
[6] Y. Chen, W.D. Cook, C. Kao and J. Zhu, Network DEA pitfalls: divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226 (2013) 507-515. · Zbl 1292.90073
[7] Y. Chen, Y.J. Li, L. Liang, A. Salo and H.Q. Wu, Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (2016) 543-554. · Zbl 1346.90418
[8] W. Cook and L. Seiford, Data envelopment analysis (DEA) -thirty years on. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192 (2009) 1-17. · Zbl 1180.90151
[9] D.K. Despotis, G. Koronakos and D. Sotiros, The “weak-link” approach to network DEA for two-stage processes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254 (2016) 481-492. · Zbl 1481.90222
[10] A. Emrouznejad and G.L. Yang, A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2016. Soc.-Econ. Planning Sci. 61 (2018) 4-8.
[11] R. Färe, S. Grosskopf and G. Whittaker, Network DEA. Soc.-Econ. Planning Sci. 34 (2000) 35-49.
[12] D. Gupta and W. Weerawat, Supplier-manufacturer coordination in capacitated two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175 (2006) 67-89. · Zbl 1137.90346
[13] C. Kao, Network data envelopment analysis: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239 (2014) 1-16. · Zbl 1339.90005
[14] C. Kao, Network Data Envelopment Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Springer (2017). · Zbl 1358.90001
[15] C. Kao, A classification of slacks-based efficiency measures in network data envelopment analysis with an analysis of the properties possessed. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270 (2018) 1109-1121. · Zbl 1403.90417
[16] C. Kao, Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275 (2019) 599-607. · Zbl 1430.90231
[17] C. Kao and S.-N. Hwang, Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185 (2008) 418-429. · Zbl 1137.91497
[18] C. Kao and S.T. Liu, Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems. Omega 83 (2019) 70-79.
[19] X. Li, A fair evaluation of certain stage in a two-stage structure: revisiting the typical two-stage DEA approaches. Omega 68 (2017) 155-167.
[20] Y. Li, Y. Chen, L. Liang and J. Xie, DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega 40 (2012) 611-618.
[21] L. Liang, F. Yang, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann. Oper. Res. 145 (2006) 35-49. · Zbl 1106.90045
[22] L. Liang, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav. Res. Logistics 55 (2008) 643-653. · Zbl 1160.90528
[23] S. Lim and J. Zhu, A note on two-stage network DEA model: frontier projection and duality. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (2016) 342-346. · Zbl 1348.90468
[24] J.S. Liu, L.Y.Y. Lu, W.-M. Lu and B.J.Y. Lin, Data envelopment analysis: 1978-2010: a citation-based literature survey. Omega 41 (2013) 3-15.
[25] J.S. Liu, L.Y.Y. Lu and W.-M. Lu, Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega 58 (2016) 33-45.
[26] T.W. Malone, Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Manage. Sci. 33 (1987) 1317-1332.
[27] H.D. Sherman and J. Zhu, Analyzing performance in service organizations. Sloan Manage. Rev. 54 (2013) 36-42.
[28] K. Tone and M. Tsutsui, Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009) 243-252. · Zbl 1157.90465
[29] F. Yang, D.X. Wu, L. Liang, G.B. Bi and D.S. Wu, Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Ann. Oper. Res. 185 (2011) 195-211. · Zbl 1219.90085
[30] T.Y. Zhao, J.H. Xie, Y. Chen and L. Liang, Coordination efficiency in two-stage network DEA: application to a supplier-manufacturer sustainable supply chain. Int. J. Logistics Res. App. 25 (2022) 656-677.
[31] J. Zhu, DEA under big data: data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 309 (2022) 761-783.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.