Damage-based inelastic seismic spectra. (English) Zbl 1535.74535
Summary: Current inelastic seismic spectra suffer from a conceptual limitation: they are significant only on the maximum demand of ductility and they do not include any influence of the number of response cycles, yield excursions, stiffness and strength degradation and damage potential to structures. This paper presents a stochastic approach for obtaining damage-based inelastic seismic spectra. In order to consider the cumulative damage phenomenon in structural systems under strong ground motions, the authors adopt the Park and Ang damage model that includes the displacement ductility and the hysteretic energy. The novelty is that the peak theory of random processes is adopted to achieve damage-based seismic spectra. This approach has some advantages compared with the standard statistical approaches based on a large number of recorded accelerograms. First, it drastically reduces the computational effort, while allowing us to typify the seismic motion by some parameters such as the frequency content,
peak acceleration, energy content and strong motion duration, i.e. all the parameters that affect the structural response under seismic actions. Besides, it allows to obtain the following stochastic inelastic seismic response spectra: damage-based (i) displacement and acceleration inelastic spectra, (ii) response modification factor spectra, (iii) yield strength demand spectra, and (iv) damage-based inelastic displacement ratio spectra.
MSC:
| 74L05 | Geophysical solid mechanics |
References:
| [1] | Nuti, C., Rasulo, A. and Vanzi, I., Seismic assessment of utility systems: Application to water, electric power and transportation networks safety, reliability and risk analysis: Theory, methods and applications, Proceedings of the Joint ESREL and SRA-Europe Conference3 (2009) 2519-2529. |
| [2] | Nuti, C., Rasulo, A. and Vanzi, I., Seismic safety of network structures and infrastructures, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering6 (1-2) (2010) 95-110. |
| [3] | Vanzi, I., Marano, G. C., Monti, G. and Nuti, C., A synthetic formulation for the Italian seismic hazard and code implications for the seismic risk, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering77 (2015) 111-122. |
| [4] | Braga, F., Gigliotti, R., Monti, G., Morelli, F., Nuti, C., Salvatore, W. and Vanzi, I., Post-seismic assessment of existing constructions: Evaluation of the shakemaps for identifying exclusion zones in Emilia, Earthquake and Structures8 (1) (2015) 37-56. |
| [5] | Huang, Y., Briseghella, B., Zordan, T., Wu, Q. and Chen, B., Shaking table tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of an innovative lightweight bridge with CFST composite truss girder and lattice pier, Engineering Structures75 (2014) 73-86. |
| [6] | Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance: Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, (2005). |
| [7] | FEMA, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, (2000), Washington, D.C. |
| [8] | Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J., Earthquake Spectra and Design (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, 1982). |
| [9] | Krawinkler, H. and Nassar, A. A., Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities. in Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of RC Buildings, eds. Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H. (Elsevier, 1992), pp. 23-39. |
| [10] | Miranda, E., Site-dependent strength-reduction factors, ASCE J. Struct. Eng.119 (0) (1993) 3503-3519. |
| [11] | Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M., Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.23 (5) (1994) 507-521. |
| [12] | Liu, T., Zordan, T., Briseghella, B. and Zhang, Q., Evaluation of equivalent linear analysis methods for seismically isolated buildings characterized by SDOF systems, Engineering Structures59 (2014) 619-634. |
| [13] | Briseghella, B., Mazzarollo, E., Zordan, T. and Liu, T., Friction pendulum system as a retrofit technique for existing R.C. building, Structural Engineering International23 (2) (2013) 219-224. |
| [14] | Fiore, A., Spagnoletti, G. and Greco, R., On the prediction of shear brittle collapse mechanisms due to the infill-frame interaction in RC buildings under pushover analysis, Engineering Structures121 (2016) 147-159. |
| [15] | Bergami, A. V., Forte, A., Lavorato, D. and Nuti, C., The incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA): Proposal and application, Proceedings of 16WCEE, 9-13 Genuary 2016, Santiago del Cile, Cile, . |
| [16] | Bergami, A. V. and Nuti, C., A design procedure of dissipative braces for seismic upgrading structures, Earthquake and Structures4 (1) (2013) 85-108. |
| [17] | Resta, M., Fiore, A. and Monaco, P., Non-linear finite element analysis of masonry towers by adopting the damage plasticity constitutive model, Advances in Structural Engineering16 (5) (2013) 791-803. |
| [18] | Lavorato, D. and Nuti, C., Pseudo-dynamic tests on reinforced concrete bridges repaired and retrofitted after seismic damage, Engineering Structures94 (2015) 96-112. |
| [19] | Vui, V. C. and Hamid, R. R., Correlation between seismic parameters of far-fault motions and damage indices of low-rise reinforced concrete frames, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.66 (2014) 102-112. |
| [20] | Chai, Y. H., Fajfar, P. and Romstad, K. M., Formulation of duration-dependent inelastic seismic design spectrum, ASCE J. Struct. Eng.124 (8) (1998) 913-921. |
| [21] | Chai, Y. H., Incorporating low-cycle fatigue model into duration-dependent inelastic design spectra, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.34 (1) (2005) 83-96. |
| [22] | Jiang, H. J., Chen, L. Z. and Chen, Q., Seismic damage assessment and performance levels of reinforced concrete members, Procedia Eng.14 (2011) 939-945. |
| [23] | Malhotra, P. K., Cyclic demand spectrum, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.31 (2002) 1441-1457. |
| [24] | Fajfar, P., Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low cycle fatigue, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.21 (1992) 837-848. |
| [25] | Cosenza, E. and Manfredi, G., Seismic design based on low cycle fatigue criteria, in Proc. 11th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1996). |
| [26] | Kunnath, S. K. and Chai, Y. H., Cumulative damage based inelastic cyclic demand spectrum, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.33 (2004) 499-520. |
| [27] | Jean, W. Y. and Loh, C. H., Seismic demand for SDOF system based on structural damage control concept, The Sixth East Asia-Pacific Conf. Structural Engineering and Construction, Taipei, Taiwan, (1998), pp. 1633-1638. |
| [28] | Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V. V., Damage spectra: Characteristics and applications to seismic risk reduction, ASCE J. Struct. Eng.129 (10) (2003) 1330-1340. |
| [29] | Moustafa, A., Damage-based design earthquake loads for single-degree-of-freedom inelastic structures, J. Struct. Eng.3 (2011) 456-467. |
| [30] | Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G. and Polese, M., Simplified method to include cumulative damage in the seismic response of single degree of freedom systems, J. Eng. Mech.135 (8) (2009) 1081-1088. |
| [31] | Loh, C., Hwang, C. and Jean, W., Seismic demand based on damage control model-considering basin effect and source effect, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.17 (5) (1998) 335-345. |
| [32] | Park, Y. J. and Ang, A. H. S., Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete, J. Struct. Eng.111 (4) (1985) 722-739. |
| [33] | Lu, Y. and Wei, J., Damage-based inelastic spectra for seismic design incorporating performance considerations, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.28 (7) (2008) 536-549. |
| [34] | Tajimi, H., A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake, in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Earthquake Engineering (1960). |
| [35] | Stafford, P. J., Sgobba, S. and Marano, G. C., An energy-based envelope function for the stochastic simulation of earthquake accelerograms, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.29 (7) (2009) 1123-1133. |
| [36] | Wen, Y. K., Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems, ASCE J. Eng. Mech. Div.102 (1976) 150-154. |
| [37] | Marano, G. C., Greco, R., Quaranta, G., Fiore, A., Avakian, J. and Cascella, D., Parametric identification of nonlinear devices for seismic protection using soft computing techniques, Adv. Mater. Res.639-640 (2013) 118-129. |
| [38] | Quaranta, G., Marano, G. C., Greco, R. and Monti, G., Parametric identification of seismic isolators using differential evolution and particle swarm optimization, Appl. Soft Comput.22 (2014) 458-464. |
| [39] | Marano, G. C. and Sgobba, S., Stochastic energy analysis of seismic isolated bridges, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.27 (8) (2007) 759-773. |
| [40] | Cunha, A. M. F., The role of the stochastic equivalent linearization method in the analysis of the non linear seismic response of building structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.23 (1984) 837-857. |
| [41] | Fiore, A., Marano, G. C. and Natale, M. G., Theoretical prediction of the dynamic behavior of rolling-ball rubber-layer isolation systems, Struct. Control Health Monitor.23 (2016) 1150-1167. |
| [42] | Lucchini, A., Greco, R., Marano, G. C. and Monti, G., Robust design of tuned mass damper systems for seismic protection of multistory buildings, J. Struct. Eng.140 (8) (2014) A4014009. |
| [43] | Marano, G. C., Trentadue, F. and Greco, R., Stochastic optimum design criterion of added viscous dampers for building seismic protection, Struct. Eng. Mech.25 (1) (2007). |
| [44] | Marano, G. C., Greco, R. and Palombella, G., Stochastic optimal design of linear turned mass dampers in high tower seismic protection, Struct. Eng. Mech.29 (6) (2008) 603-622. |
| [45] | Marano, G. C., Quaranta, G. and Greco, R., Multi-objective optimization by genetic algorithm of structural systems subject to random vibrations, Struct. Multidisciplinary Opt.39 (2009) 385-399. |
| [46] | Marano, G. C. and Greco, R., Damage and ductility demand spectra assessment of hysteretic degrading systems subject to stochastic seismic loads, J. Earthq. Eng.10 (3) (2006) 1-26. |
| [47] | Bouc, W., Forced vibration of mechanical system with hysteresis, in Proc. 4th Conf. Nonlinear Oscillation, Prague, (1967). |
| [48] | Jennings, P. C. and Housner, G. W., Simulated earthquake motions for design purpose, in Proc. 4th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, (1968). |
| [49] | Greco, R., Fiore, A. and Marano, G. C., The Role of Modulation Function in Nonstationary Stochastic Earthquake Model, J. Earthq. Tsunami8 (5) (2014) 1450015. |
| [50] | Atalik, S. and Utku, T., Stochastic linearization of multi degree of freedom nonlinear systems, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.4 (1976) 411-420. |
| [51] | Lutes, L. D. and Sarkani, S., Random Vibrations (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2001). |
| [52] | Marano, G. C., Acciani, G., Fiore, A. and Abrescia, A., Integration algorithm for covariance non-stationary dynamic analysis of SDOF systems using equivalent stochastic linearization, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.15 (2) (2015) 1450044. · Zbl 1359.74477 |
| [53] | Marano, G. C. and Greco, R., Efficiency of base isolation systems in structural seismic protection and energetic assessment, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.32 (10) (2003) 1505-1531. |
| [54] | Greco, R. and Marano, G. C., Site based stochastic seismic spectra, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.55 (2013) 288-295. |
| [55] | Greco, R., Monti, G. and Marano, G. C., Influence of post-yield stiffness on inelastic seismic response: A stochastic analysis, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455417500286. · Zbl 1535.74536 |
| [56] | Marano, G. C., Trentadue, F. and Greco, R., Optimum design criteria for elastic structures subject to random dynamic loads, Eng. Opt.38 (7) (2006) 853-871. |
| [57] | Marano, G. C., Trentadue, F. and Greco, R., Stochastic optimum design criterion for linear damper devices for seismic protection of buildings, Struct. Multidisciplin. Opti.33 (6) (2007) 441-455. |
| [58] | A. K. Chopra, Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: Single degree of freedom bilinear systems, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. 2003-09 (2003) University of California, Berkeley. |
| [59] | Song, J. K. and Hong, K. J., Inelastic displacement ratios of smooth hysteretic behavior systems subjected to near-fault and far-fault earthquake, in 15th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (2012), Lisboa, (Spain). |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
