×

An efficient weighted residual time integration family. (English) Zbl 1535.70055

Summary: A new family of time integration methods is formulated. The recommended technique is useful and robust for the loads with large variations and the systems with nonlinear damping behavior. It is also applicable for the structures with lots of degrees of freedom, and can handle general nonlinear dynamic systems. By comparing the presented scheme with the fourth-order Runge-Kutta and the Newmark algorithms, it is concluded that the new strategy is more stable. The authors’ formulations have good results on amplitude decay and dispersion error analyses. Moreover, the family orders of accuracy are \(m+2\) and \(m+3\) for even and odd values of \(m\), respectively. Findings demonstrate the superiority of the new family compared to explicit and implicit methods and dissipative and non-dissipative algorithms.

MSC:

70H06 Completely integrable systems and methods of integration for problems in Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bathe, K. J., Finite Element Procedure, 2nd edn. (Pearson Education, Prentice Hall, 2014).
[2] Chang, S. Y., Comparisons of structure-dependent explicit methods for time integration, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.15(3) (2015) 1450055. · Zbl 1359.74469
[3] Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of Structures, International edn. (Pearson Higher Ed, 2015).
[4] Ghassemieh, M., Gholampour, A. and Massah, S., Application of weight functions in nonlinear analysis of structural dynamics problems, Int. J. Comput. Methods13(1) (2016) 1650005. · Zbl 1359.74123
[5] Giri, S. and Sen, S., A new class of diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods with zero dissipation and minimized dispersion error, J. Comput. Appl. Math.376 (2020) 112841. · Zbl 1524.65266
[6] Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J. and Taylor, R. L., Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.5(3) (1977) 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050306
[7] Ji, Y. and Xing, Y., A two-sub-step generalized central difference method for general dynamics, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.20(7) (2020) 2050071. · Zbl 1535.65133
[8] Kennedy, C. A. and Carpenter, M. H., Diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods for stiff ODEs, Appl. Numer. Math.146 (2019) 221-244. · Zbl 1437.65061
[9] Kuo, S. R., Yau, J. D. and Yang, Y. B., A robust time-integration algorithm for solving nonlinear dynamic problems with large rotations and displacements, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.12(6) (2012) 1250051. · Zbl 1359.70003
[10] Khennane, A., Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using MATLAB and Abaqus (CRC Press, 2013). · Zbl 1278.74001
[11] Kim, W., Park, S. S. and Reddy, J. N., A cross weighted-residual time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.14(6) (2014) 1450023. · Zbl 1359.74417
[12] Kim, W. and Reddy, J. N., An improved time integration algorithm: A collocation time finite element approach, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.17(2) (2017) 1750024. · Zbl 1535.74643
[13] Lavrenčič, M. and Brank, B., Comparison of numerically dissipative schemes for structural dynamics: generalized-alpha versus energy-decaying methods, Thin-Walled Struct.157 (2020) 107075.
[14] Malakiyeh, M. M., Shojaee, S., Hamzehei-Javaran, S. and Tadayon, B., Further insights into time-integration method based on Bernstein polynomials and Bezier curve for structural dynamics, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.19(10) (2019) 1950113. · Zbl 1535.74647
[15] Oborin, E. and Irschik, H., Improvement of discrete-mechanics-type time integration schemes by utilizing balance relations in integral form together with Picard-type iterations, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.20(4) (2020) 2050046. · Zbl 1535.70054
[16] Paz, M. and Kim, Y. H., Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation, 6th edn. (Springer, 2019).
[17] Razavi, S., Abolmaali, A. and Ghassemieh, M., A weighted residual parabolic acceleration time integration method for problems in structural dynamics, Comput. Methods Appl. Math.7(3) (2007) 227-238. · Zbl 1121.74032
[18] Rezaiee-Pajand, M. and Hashemian, M., Time integration method based on discrete transfer function, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.16(5) (2016) 1550009. · Zbl 1359.74440
[19] Rezaiee-Pajand, M. and Karimi-Rad, M., A new explicit time integration scheme for nonlinear dynamic analysis, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.16(9) (2016) 1550054. · Zbl 1359.65117
[20] Rezaiee-Pajand, M., Esfehani, S. A. H. and Karimi-Rad, M., Highly accurate family of time integration method, Struct. Eng. Mech.67(6) (2018) 603-616.
[21] Wen, W. B., Wei, K., Lei, H. S., Duan, S. Y. and Fang, D. N., A novel sub-step composite implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Comput. Struct.182 (2017) 176-186.
[22] Wereley, N. M., Pang, L. and Kamath, G. M., Idealized hysteresis modeling of electrorheological and magnetorheological dampers, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.9(8) (1998) 642-649.
[23] Yin, S. H., A new explicit time integration method for structural dynamics, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.13(3) (2013) 1250068. · Zbl 1359.65120
[24] Zhang, H. M., Xing, Y. F. and Ji, Y., An energy-conserving and decaying time integration method for general nonlinear dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.121(5) (2020) 925-944. · Zbl 07843230
[25] Zhong, W. X. and Williams, F. W., A precise time step integration method, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci.208(6) (1994) 427-430.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.