×

Unsymmetric extensions of Wilson’s incompatible four-node quadrilateral and eight-node hexahedral elements. (English) Zbl 1531.74074

Summary: The unsymmetric finite element is based on the virtual work principle with different sets of test and trial functions. In this article, the incompatible four-node quadrilateral element and eight-node hexahedral element originated by Wilson et al. are extended to their unsymmetric forms. The isoparametric shape functions together with E. L. Wilson’s incompatible functions [in: S. T. Fenven (ed.), Numerical and computer methods in structural mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press (1973; doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-253250-4.50008-7)] are chosen as the test functions, while internal nodes at the middle of element sides/edges are added to generate the trial functions with quadratic completeness in the Cartesian coordinate system. A local area/volume coordinate frame is established so that the trial shape functions can be explicitly obtained. The key idea which avoids the matrix inversion is that the trial nodal shape functions are constructed by standard quadratic triangular/tetrahedral elements and then transformed in consistent with the quadrilateral/hexahedral elements. Numerical examples show that the present elements keep the merits of both incompatible and unsymmetric elements, that is, high numerical accuracy, insensitivity to mesh distortion, free of trapezoidal and volumetric locking, and easy implementation.
{© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.}

MSC:

74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74S22 Isogeometric methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74K10 Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] RajendranS, LiewKM. A novel unsymmetric 8‐node plane element immune to mesh distortion under a quadratic displacement field. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2003;58(11):1713‐1748. · Zbl 1032.74680
[2] RajendranS. A technique to develop mesh‐distortion immune finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199(17-20):1044‐1063. · Zbl 1227.74090
[3] LiewKM, RajendranS, WangJ. A quadratic plane triangular element immune to quadratic mesh distortions under quadratic displacement fields. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2006;195(9-12):1207‐1223. · Zbl 1115.74050
[4] OoiET, RajendranS, YeoJH. A 20‐node hexahedron element with enhanced distortion tolerance. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2004;60(15):2501‐2530. · Zbl 1075.74665
[5] CenS, ZhouGH, FuXR. A shape‐free 8‐node plane element unsymmetric analytical trial function method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2012;91(2):158‐185. · Zbl 1246.74057
[6] CenS, ZhouPL, LiCF, WuCJ. An unsymmetric 4‐node, 8‐DOF plane membrane element perfectly breaking through MacNeal’s theorem. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2015;103(7):469‐500. · Zbl 1352.74158
[7] ZhouPL, CenS, HuangJB, LiCF, ZhangQ. An unsymmetric 8‐node hexahedral element with high distortion tolerance. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2017;109(8):1130‐1158. · Zbl 07874339
[8] XieQ, SzeKY, ZhouYX. Modified and Trefftz unsymmetric finite element models. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2016;12(1):53‐70.
[9] ShangY, OuyangW. 4‐node unsymmetric quadrilateral membrane element with drilling DOFs insensitive to severe mesh‐distortion. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2018;113:1589‐1606. · Zbl 07867282
[10] ShangY, QianZH, CenS, LiCF. A simple unsymmetric 4‐node 12‐DOF membrane element for the modified couple stress theory. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2019;119:807‐825. · Zbl 07863933
[11] HuangYQ, HuanYK, ChenHB. An incompatible and unsymmetric four‐node quadrilateral plane element with high numerical performance. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2020;121(15):3382‐3396. · Zbl 07863285
[12] YuanKY, HuangYS, PianTHH. New strategy for assumed stresses for 4‐node hybrid stress membrane element. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1993;36(10):1747‐1763. · Zbl 0772.73086
[13] WuCC, HuangMG, PianTHH. Consistency condition and convergence criteria of incompatible elements: general formulation of incompatible functions and its application. Comput Struct. 1987;27(5):639‐644. · Zbl 0623.73077
[14] HuangYQ, LiQS. Four‐node incompatible plane and axisymmetric elements with quadratic completeness in the physical space. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2004;61:1603‐1624. · Zbl 1075.74649
[15] WilsonEL, TaylorRL, DohertyWP, GhabussiT. Incompatible displacement models. In: FenvenST (ed.), ed. Numerical and Computer Methods in Structural Mechanics. Academic Press; 1973. · Zbl 0305.73035
[16] TaylorRL, BeresfordPJ, WilsonEL. A non‐conforming element for stress analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1976;10(6):1211‐1219. · Zbl 0338.73041
[17] PianTHH, SumiharaK. Rational approach for assumed stress finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1984;20(9):1685‐1695. · Zbl 0544.73095
[18] WuCC, CheungYK. On optimization approaches of hybrid stress elements. Finite Elem Anal Des. 1995;21:111‐128. · Zbl 0875.65070
[19] SzeKY. On immunizing five‐beta hybrid stress element models from ’trapezoidal locking’ in practical analyses. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2000;47(4):907‐920. · Zbl 0956.74065
[20] MacNealRH, HarderRL. A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Finite Elem Anal Des. 1985;1:3‐20.
[21] PianTHH, TongP. Relations between incompatible model and hybrid stress model. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1986;22(1):173‐181. · Zbl 0593.73068
[22] CheungYK, ChenWJ. Isoparametric hybrid hexahedral elements for three dimensional stress analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1988;26(3):677‐693. · Zbl 0635.73082
[23] CookRD, MalkusDS, PleshaME. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis. 3rd ed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1989. · Zbl 0696.73039
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.