×
Qin, Yanfei; Sun, Ziwen

Memory dynamic output feedback controller based on asynchronous event-triggered robust H-infinity control for nonlinear ICPSs under data injection attacks. (English) Zbl 1527.93138

Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 32, No. 3, 1904-1921 (2022).
Summary: Aiming at reducing the influence caused by data injection attacks, an asynchronous event-triggered robust \(H_\infty\) control (AERHC) is proposed for the stability of nonlinear ICPSs suffering from data injection attacks. A robust \(H_\infty\) memory dynamic feedback control technique is designed to guarantee asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system under a Lyapunov functional and the robust \(H_\infty\) stability criterion. Furthermore, a memory dynamic feedback controller which has five controller gains different from each other for mitigating the conservative of nonlinear ICPSs and for resisting data injection attacks in ICPSs. Meanwhile, an asynchronous event-triggered strategy is adopted to reduce the data communication frequency among nonlinear ICPSs components, and it effectively handle the influence of coupling problem between the measurement channel and the control channel. Finally, simulation tests are conducted by using MATLAB to control the robustness of the motor angle position of electromechanical system by using AERHC, which verify that the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method.
{© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

Cited in 1 Document

MSC:

93B52 Feedback control
93C65 Discrete event control/observation systems
93B36 \(H^\infty\)-control
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory

Keywords:

asynchronous event-triggered robust \(H_\infty\) control; data injection attacks; memory dynamic feedback controller; nonlinear industrial cyber physical systems

Software:

Matlab
Cite Review PDF
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] LiuZJ, ZhaoJ. Resilient adaptive control of switched nonlinear cyber‐physical systems under uncertain deception attacks. Inf Sci. 2021;543:398‐409. · Zbl 1478.93323
[2] KannanR, SolaiSM, SenthilMK. Pre‐channel scheduling and priority‐based reservation in medium access control for industrial wireless sensor network applications. Comput Electr Eng. 2017;64:322‐336.
[3] AlladiT, VinayC, SheraliZ. Industrial control systems: cyber‐attack trends and countermeasures. Comput Commun. 2020;155:1‐8.
[4] GengeB, HallerP, VasileAD. Engineering security‐aware control applications for data authentication in smart industrial cyber‐physical systems. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2019;91:206‐222.
[5] DeruiD, HanQL, WangZD, et al. A survey on model‐based distributed control and filtering for industrial cyber‐physical systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2019;15(5):2483‐2499.
[6] DingDR, HanQL, XiangY, et al. A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber‐physical systems. Neurocomputing. 2018;275:1674‐1683.
[7] GuanXP, YangB, ChenCL, et al. A comprehensive overview of cyber‐physical systems: from perspective of feedback system. IEEE/CAA J Automat Sin. 2016;3(1):1‐14.
[8] GeH, YueD, XieXP, et al. A unified modeling of multi‐sources cyber‐attacks with uncertainties for CPS security control. J Franklin Inst. 2021;358(1):89‐113. · Zbl 1459.94160
[9] DibajiSM, PiraniM, FlamholzDB, et al. A systems and control perspective of CPS security. Annu Rev Control. 2019;47:394‐411.
[10] TeixeiraA, SandbergH, JohanssonK. Networked control systems under cyber attacks with applications to power networks. Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference; June 30‐July 2, 2010:3690‐3696; Baltimore, MD. 10.1109/ACC.2010.5530638
[11] CetinkayaA, IshiiH, HayakawaT. Event‐triggered output feedback control resilient against jamming attacks and random packet losses. IFAC‐Papers OnLine. 2015;48:270‐275.
[12] LuAY, YangGH. Input‐to‐state stabilizing control for cyber‐physical systems with multiple transmission channels under denial‐of‐service. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2018;63(6):1813‐1820. · Zbl 1395.93483
[13] SunY, YangG. Periodic event‐triggered resilient control for cyber‐physical systems under denial‐of‐service attacks. J Franklin Inst. 2018;355:5613–5631. · Zbl 1451.93244
[14] FengS, TesiP. Resilient control under denial‐of‐service: robust design. Automatica. 2017;2016(79):42‐51. · Zbl 1371.93124
[15] National Business Daily. The United States has declared a national \(!\) emergency! The largest oil pipeline was shut down by a cyber‐attack. (2021‐05‐09)[2021‐05‐09]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1699339241579378345 & wfr=spider & for=pc.
[16] LiangGQ, WellerSR, ZhaoJH, et al. The 2015 Ukraine blackout: implications for false data injection attacks. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2017;32(4):3317‐3318.
[17] LiZW, TongWM, JinXJ. Construction of cyber security defense hierarchy and cyber security testing system of smart grid: thinking and enlightenment for network attack events to national power grid of Ukraine and Israel. Automat Electric Power Syst. 2016;40(8):147‐151.
[18] HuangX, DongJX. A robust dynamic compensation approach for cyber‐physical systems against multiple types of actuator attacks. Appl Math Comput. 2020;380:125284. · Zbl 1460.93037
[19] JiXF, RenMW, SuHY. Comment on “further enhancement on robust \(\operatorname{H}_{\operatorname{\infty}}\) control design for discrete‐time singular systems”. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2015;60(11):3119‐3210. · Zbl 1360.93219
[20] SuL, YeD. Observer‐based output feedback \(\operatorname{H}_{\operatorname{\infty}}\) control for cyber‐physical systems under randomly occurring packet dropout and periodic DoS attacks. ISA Trans. 2019;95:58‐67.
[21] DingDR, WangZ, HoDW, WeiG. Observer‐based event‐triggering consensus control for multi‐agent systems with lossy sensors and cyber‐attacks. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2017;47(8):1936‐1947.
[22] LiuJL, YinTT, ShenMQ, et al. State estimation for cyber‐physical systems with limited communication resources, sensor saturation and denial‐of‐service attacks. ISA Trans. 2020;104:101‐114.
[23] ZhaoD, WangZD, WeiGL, et al. A dynamic event‐triggered approach to observer‐based PID security control subject to deception attacks. Automatica. 2020;120:109128. · Zbl 1448.93219
[24] SunYC, YangGH. Event‐triggered resilient control for cyber‐physical systems under asynchronous DoS attacks. Inf Sci. 2018;465:340‐352. · Zbl 1448.93212
[25] SongL, WuJ, LongC, LiS. Asynchronous event‐triggered output feedback control for CPS under data injection attacks. Proceedings of the 2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC); November 30 ‐2 December 2, 2018:2530‐2535; Xi’an, China. 10.1109/CAC.2018.8623668
[26] DingD, WangZ, HanQ, et al. Neural‐network‐based output‐feedback control under round‐robin scheduling protocols. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019;49(6):2372‐2384.
[27] YangJ, SunJK, ZhengWX, et al. Periodic event‐triggered robust output feedback control for nonlinear uncertain systems with time‐varying disturbance. Automatica. 2018;94:324‐333. · Zbl 1401.93106
[28] ZaheerMH, ArthurKM, YoonSY. Derivative feedback control of nonlinear systems with uncertain equilibrium states and actuator constraints. Automatica. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109495 · Zbl 1461.93409
[29] WangH, ZhuQX. Output‐feedback stabilization of a class of stochastic high‐order nonlinear systems with stochastic inverse dynamics and multi‐delay. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2021. doi:10.1002/rnc.5555 · Zbl 1525.93323
[30] LiuX, SuX, ShiP, ShenC, PengY. Event‐triggered sliding mode control of nonlinear dynamic system. Automatica. 2020;112:108730. · Zbl 1430.93029
[31] GahinetP, ApkarianP. A linear matrix inequality approach to \(\operatorname{H}_{\operatorname{\infty}}\) control. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 1994;4:421‐448. · Zbl 0808.93024
[32] BoydS, EiGhaouiL, FeronE, et al. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1994:1‐187. · Zbl 0816.93004
[33] YuL. Robust control‐Linear Matrix Inequalities. Tsinghua University Press; 2002:1‐272.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.