On the concept of state in quantum mechanics: another way to decoherence? (English) Zbl 1526.81002
Summary: According to a formulation of the quantum theory presented by R. Haag and D. Kastler [J. Math. Phys. 5, 848–861 (1964; Zbl 0139.46003)] more than half a century ago, the observables of a system, rather than the states, are the primary objects. In this paper we assume that only those observables that do really exist as measurement instruments determine the properties of the states. If this is the case, states that would be pure if all the self-adjoint operators corresponded to existing instruments may turn out to be statistical mixtures. This proposal, although not free from disconcerting implications on the very concept of state, may entail a new way of looking both at some of the most popular “paradoxes” and, more significantly, at the measuring process.
MSC:
| 81P05 | General and philosophical questions in quantum theory |
| 81P16 | Quantum state spaces, operational and probabilistic concepts |
| 81S22 | Open systems, reduced dynamics, master equations, decoherence |
| 81P15 | Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations |
Citations:
Zbl 0139.46003References:
| [1] | Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B.; Rosen, N., Can Quantum-Mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev., 47, 777 (1935) · Zbl 0012.04201 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 |
| [2] | Picasso, LE, Lectures in Quantum Mechanics – a Two Term Course, 338-343 (2016), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1365.81002 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22632-3 |
| [3] | Haag, R.; Kastler, D., An algebraic approach to quantum field theory, J. Math. Phys., 5, 848 (1964) · Zbl 0139.46003 · doi:10.1063/1.1704187 |
| [4] | Wick, GC; Wightman, AS; Wigner, EP, The intrinsic parity of elementary particles, Phys. Rev., 88, 101 (1952) · Zbl 0046.43906 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.88.101 |
| [5] | Aspect, A.; Grangier, P.; Roger, G., Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: a new violation of bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 91-94 (1982) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 |
| [6] | Yin, Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers, Science, 356, 1140-1144 (2017) · doi:10.1126/science.aan3211 |
| [7] | Rinner, Stefan; Werner, Ernst, On the role of entanglement in schrödinger’s cat paradox, Cent. Eur. J. Phys., 6, 1, 178-183 (2008) |
| [8] | Wechsler, SD, The Quantum Mechanics Needs the Principle of Wave-Function Collapse-But This Principle Shouldn’t Be Misunderstood, J. Quantum Inf. Sci., 11, 42-63 (2021) · doi:10.4236/jqis.2021.111004 |
| [9] | David Mermin, N., Could Feynman have said this?, Phys. Today, 57, 5, 10 (2004) · doi:10.1063/1.1768652 |
| [10] | Fabri, E.; Fiorio, G., Charge superselection arising from random electromagnetic interactions, Il Nuovo Cimento, 27, 1037 (1963) · doi:10.1007/BF02783293 |
| [11] | Zurek, W.: Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical-Revisited. Los Alamos Science Number 27. and the references therein (2002) · Zbl 1034.81029 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
