×

The expected loss of feature diversity (versus phylogenetic diversity) following rapid extinction at the present. (English) Zbl 1522.92040

Summary: The current rapid extinction of species leads not only to their loss but also the disappearance of the unique features they harbour, which have evolved along the branches of the underlying evolutionary tree. One proxy for estimating the feature diversity (FD) of a set \(S\) of species at the tips of a tree is ‘phylogenetic diversity’ (PD): the sum of the branch lengths of the subtree connecting the species in \(S\). For a phylogenetic tree that evolves under a standard birth-death process, and which is then subject to a sudden extinction event at the present (the simple ‘field of bullets’ model with a survival probability of \(s\) per species) the proportion of the original PD that is retained after extinction at the present is known to converge quickly to a particular concave function \(\varphi_{PD}(s)\) as \(t\) grows. To investigate how the loss of FD mirrors the loss of PD for a birth-death tree, we model FD by assuming that distinct discrete features arise randomly and independently along the branches of the tree at rate \(r\) and are lost at a constant rate \(\nu \). We derive an exact mathematical expression for the ratio \(\varphi_{FD}(s)\) of the two expected feature diversities (prior to and following an extinction event at the present) as \(t\) becomes large. We find that although \(\varphi_{FD}\) has a similar behaviour to \(\varphi_{PD} \) (and coincides with it for \(\nu =0)\), when \(\nu >0,\) \(\varphi_{FD}(s)\) is described by a function that is different from \(\varphi_{PD}(s)\). We also derive an exact expression for the expected number of features that are present in precisely one extant species. Our paper begins by establishing some generic properties of FD in a more general (non-phylogenetic) setting and applies this to fixed trees, before considering the setting of random (birth-death) trees.

MSC:

92D15 Problems related to evolution
05C90 Applications of graph theory
60J85 Applications of branching processes

Software:

NetDiversity

References:

[1] Devictor, V.; Mouillot, D.; Meynard, C.; Jiguet, F.; Thuiller, W.; Mouquet, N., Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world, Ecol Lett, 13, 1030-1040 (2010)
[2] Faith, DP, Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity, Biol Cons, 61, 1, 1-10 (1992) · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3
[3] Feller, W., An introduction to probability theory and its applications (1950), London: Wiley, London · Zbl 0039.13201
[4] Gillespie, D., A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J Comput Phys, 22, 403-434 (1976) · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3
[5] Huson, D.; Steel, M., Phylogenetic trees based on gene content, Bioinformatics, 20, 2044-2049 (2004) · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth198
[6] Jagers, P., Stabilities and instabilities in population dynamics, J Appl Probab, 29, 770-780 (1992) · Zbl 0769.60079 · doi:10.2307/3214711
[7] Kendall, DG, On the generalized birth-and-death process, Ann Math Stat, 19, 1-15 (1948) · Zbl 0032.17604 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730285
[8] Lambert, A.; Steel, M., Predicting the loss of phylogenetic diversity under non-stationary diversification models, J Theor Biol, 337, 111-124 (2013) · Zbl 1411.92214 · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.009
[9] Mazel, F.; Mooers, AO; Riva, GVD; Pennell, MW, Conserving phylogenetic diversity can be a poor strategy for conserving functional diversity, Syst Biol, 66, 6, 1019-1027 (2017) · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syx054
[10] Mazel, F.; Pennell, MW; Cadotte, MW; Diaz, S.; Riva, GVD; Grenyer, R.; Leprieur, F.; Mooers, AO; Mouillot, D.; Tucker, CM; Pearse, WD, Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably, Nat Commun, 9, 2888 (2018) · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3
[11] Mazel, F.; Pennell, MW; Cadotte, MW; Diaz, S.; Riva, GVD; Grenyer, R.; Leprieur, F.; Mooers, AO; Mouillot, D.; Tucker, CM; Pearse, WD, Reply to: “Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity”, Nat Commun, 10, 858 (2019) · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08603-5
[12] McDiarmid, C., On the method of bounded differences, Surveys in combinatorics, London mathematical society lecture notes series 141, 148-188 (1989), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 0712.05012
[13] Miller, JT; Jolley-Rogers, G.; Mishler, BD; Thornhill, AH, Phylogenetic diversity is a better measure of biodiversity than taxon counting, J Syst Evol, 56, 6, 663-667 (2018) · doi:10.1111/jse.12436
[14] Mitzenmacher, M.; Upfal, E., Probability and computing: Randomized algorithms and probabilistic analysis (2005), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 1092.60001 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813603
[15] Mooers, A.; Gascuel, O.; Stadler, T.; Li, H.; Steel, M., Branch lengths on birth-death trees and the expected loss of phylogenetic diversity, Syst Biol, 61, 2, 195-203 (2012) · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr090
[16] Owen, NR; Gumbs, R.; Gray, CL; Faith, DP, Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity, Nat Commun, 10, 859 (2019) · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08600-8
[17] Raup, DM, Extinction: bad genes or bad luck? (1993), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford
[18] Rosindell J, Manson K, Gumbs R, Pearse W, Steel M (2022) Phylogenetic biodiversity metrics should account for both accumulation and attrition of evolutionary heritage. Technical Report 2022.07.16.499419, BioRxiv
[19] Stadler, T., Simulating trees with a fixed number of extant species, Syst Biol, 60, 676-684 (2011) · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr029
[20] Stadler, T.; Steel, M., Distribution of branch lengths and phylogenetic diversity under homogeneous speciation models, J Theor Biol, 297, 2, 33-40 (2012) · Zbl 1336.92056 · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.11.019
[21] Team RC (2021) A language and environment for statistical computing (accessed on 7 August 2021)
[22] Tucker, CM; Aze, T.; Cadotte, MW; Cantalapiedra, JL; Chisholm, C.; Díaz, S., Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history, Biol Rev, 94, 1740-1760 (2019) · doi:10.1111/brv.12526
[23] Tucker, CM; Davies, TJ; Cadotte, MW; Pearse, WD, On the relationship between phylogenetic diversity and trait diversity, Ecology, 99, 6, 1473-1479 (2018) · doi:10.1002/ecy.2349
[24] Wicke, K.; Fischer, M., Phylogenetic diversity and biodiversity indices on phylogenetic networks, Math Biosci, 298, 80-90 (2018) · Zbl 1392.92064 · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2018.02.005
[25] Wicke, K.; Mooers, A.; Steel, M., Formal links between feature diversity and phylogenetic diversity, Syst Biol, 70, 480-490 (2021) · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa062
[26] Yang, Z.; Rannala, B., Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, Mol Biol Evol, 14, 7, 717-724 (1997) · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025811
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.