×

Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data. (English) Zbl 1522.62197

Summary: Interval-censored competing risks data arise when each study subject may experience an event or failure from one of several causes and the failure time is not observed directly but rather is known to lie in an interval between two examinations. We formulate the effects of possibly time-varying (external) covariates on the cumulative incidence or sub-distribution function of competing risks (i.e., the marginal probability of failure from a specific cause) through a broad class of semiparametric regression models that captures both proportional and non-proportional hazards structures for the sub-distribution. We allow each subject to have an arbitrary number of examinations and accommodate missing information on the cause of failure. We consider nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation and devise a fast and stable EM-type algorithm for its computation. We then establish the consistency, asymptotic normality, and semiparametric efficiency of the resulting estimators for the regression parameters by appealing to modern empirical process theory. In addition, we show through extensive simulation studies that the proposed methods perform well in realistic situations. Finally, we provide an application to a study on HIV-1 infection with different viral subtypes.
{© 2017, The International Biometric Society}

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis

Software:

cmprsk; timereg

References:

[1] Bickel, P. J., Klaassen, C. A. J., Ritov, Y., and Wellner, J. A. (1993). Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. · Zbl 0786.62001
[2] Chen, K., Jin, Z., and Ying, Z. (2002). Semiparametric analysis of transformation models with censored data. Biometrika89, 659-668. · Zbl 1039.62094
[3] Cheng, S. C., Wei, L. J., and Ying, Z. (1995). Analysis of transformation models with censored data. Biometrika82, 835-845. · Zbl 0861.62071
[4] Fine, J. P. and Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association94, 496-509. · Zbl 0999.62077
[5] Gray, R. J. (1988). A class of K‐sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. The Annals of Statistics16, 1141-1154. · Zbl 0649.62040
[6] Groeneboom, P. and Jongbloed, G. (2014). Nonparametric Estimation Under Shape Constraints: Estimators, Algorithms and Asymptotics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 1338.62008
[7] Groeneboom, P., Maathuis, M. H., and Wellner, J. A. (2008a). Current status data with competing risks: Consistency and rates of convergence of the MLE. The Annals of Statistics36, 1031-1063. · Zbl 1360.62123
[8] Groeneboom, P., Maathuis, M. H., and Wellner, J. A. (2008b). Current status data with competing risks: Limiting distribution of the MLE. The Annals of Statistics36, 1064-1089. · Zbl 1216.62047
[9] Huang, J. (1996). Efficient estimation for the proportional hazards model with interval censoring. The Annals of Statistics24, 540-568. · Zbl 0859.62032
[10] Huang, J. and Wellner, J. A. (1997). Interval censored survival data: A review of recent progress. In Proceedings of the First Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics: Survival Analysis, D. Y.Lin (ed.) and T. R.Fleming (ed.), (eds), 123-169. New York: Springer‐Verlag. · Zbl 0916.62077
[11] Hudgens, M. G., Satten, G. A., and Longini, I. M. (2001). Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for competing risks survival data subject to interval censoring and truncation. Biometrics57, 74-80. · Zbl 1209.62049
[12] Hudgens, M. G., Li, C., and Fine, J. P. (2014). Parametric likelihood inference for interval censored competing risks data. Biometrics70, 1-9. · Zbl 1419.62274
[13] Jewell, N. P., van der Laan, M., and Henneman, T. (2003). Nonparametric estimation from current status data with competing risks. Biometrika90, 183-197. · Zbl 1034.62034
[14] Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. (2002), The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley. · Zbl 1012.62104
[15] Li, C. (2016). The Fine‐Gray model under interval censored competing risks data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis143, 327-344. · Zbl 1328.62280
[16] Li, C. and Fine, J. P. (2013). Smoothed nonparametric estimation for current status competing risks data. Biometrika100, 173-187. · Zbl 1284.62221
[17] Lu, W. and Ying, Z. (2004). On semiparametric transformation cure models. Biometrika91, 331-343. · Zbl 1079.62115
[18] Mao, L. and Lin, D. Y. (2016). Efficient estimation of semiparametric transformation models for the cumulative incidence of competing risks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12177. · Zbl 1414.62407
[19] Martinussen, T. and Scheike, T. H. (2006). Dynamic Regression Models for Survival Data. New York: Springer‐Verlag. · Zbl 1096.62119
[20] Murphy, S. A. and Van der Vaart, A. W. (2000). On profile likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association95, 449-465. · Zbl 0995.62033
[21] Turnbull, B. W. (1976). The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B38, 290-295. · Zbl 0343.62033
[22] van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A. (1996). Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. New York: Springer‐Verlag. · Zbl 0862.60002
[23] Wang, L., McMahan, C. S., Hudgens, M. G., and Qureshi, Z. P. (2015). A flexible, computationally efficient method for fitting the proportional hazards model to interval censored data. Biometrics72, 222-231. · Zbl 1393.62105
[24] Zeng, D., Mao, L., and Lin, D. Y. (2016). Maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric transformation models with interval‐censored data. Biometrika103, 253-271. · Zbl 1499.62419
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.