×

Population aging, social security and fiscal limits. (English) Zbl 1517.91120

Summary: We use an overlapping generations (OLG) life-cycle model with distortionary taxation on labor and capital to derive a threshold dependency ratio, i.e. a point in the cross-section distribution of the population beyond which tax revenues can no longer sustain the planned level of transfers to retirees. We quantify the level of the threshold; the distance of the economy from the threshold; and the probability of reaching the threshold at some point in the future. The model is calibrated on the United States and fourteen European countries which have dependency ratios among the highest in the world. We examine the effects on the threshold and welfare of a number of policies often advocated to improve the sustainability of pension systems. New tax data on dynamic Laffer effects are provided.

MSC:

91B64 Macroeconomic theory (monetary models, models of taxation)
91B62 Economic growth models
91D20 Mathematical geography and demography

References:

[1] Altig, D.; Auerbach, A. J.; Kotlikoff, L. J.; Smetters, K. A.; Walliser, J., Simulating fundamental tax reform in the united states, Am. Econ. Rev., 91, 3, 574-595 (2001)
[2] Auerbach, A. J.; Kotlikoff, L. J., Dynamic Fiscal Policy (1987), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[3] Auerbach, A. J.; Kotlikoff, L. J.; Skinner, J., The efficiency gains from dynamic tax reform, Int. Econ. Rev. (Philadelphia), 24, 81-100 (1983)
[4] Benabou, R., Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous-agent economy: what levels of redistribution maximize growth and effciency?, Econometrica, 70, 2, 481-517 (2002) · Zbl 1103.91394
[5] Bi, H., Sovereign default risk premia, fiscal limits, and fiscal policy, Eur. Econ. Rev., 56, 3, 389-410 (2012)
[6] Braun, R.; Joines, D. H., The implications of a graying japan for government policy, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 57, 1-23 (2015) · Zbl 1401.91507
[7] Carone, G.; Eckefeldt, P.; Giamboni, L.; Laine, V.; Summier, S. P., Pension reforms in the EU since the early 2000’s: Achievements and Challenges Ahead, Discussion Paper 042, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (2016), European Commision
[8] Conesa, J. C.; Garriga, C., Intergenerational policy and the measurement of tax incidence, European Economic Review, 83, 1-18 (2016)
[9] Conesa, J. C., Kehoe, T. J., Nygaard, V. M., Raveendranathan, G., 2019. Implications of increasing college attainment for aging in general equilibrium. NBER Working Paper 26000.
[10] Conesa, J. C.; Kitao, S.; Krueger, D., Taxing capital? not a bad idea after all!, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 1, 25-48 (2009)
[11] Cooley, T. F.; Henriksen, E., The demographic deficit, J. Monet. Econ., 93, 45-62 (2018)
[12] Council, N. R., Aging and the Macroeconomy. Long-Term Implications of an Older Population (2012), Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press
[13] Davig, T.; Leeper, E. M.; Walker, T. B., Unfunded liabilities and uncertain fiscal financing, J. Monet Econ., 57, 600-619 (2010)
[14] De Nardi, M.; İmrohoroğlu, S.; Sargent, T. J., Projected US demographics and social security, Rev. Econ. Dyn., 2, 575-615 (1999)
[15] D’Erasmo, P.; Mendoza, E. G.; Zhang, J., What is a sustainable public debt?, (Taylor, J. B.; Uhlig, H., Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 2B (2016), Elsevier, Amsterdam: Netherlands), 2499-2603
[16] Diamond, P. A., Social Security, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 1, 1-24 (2004)
[17] Diamond, P. A.; Orszag, P. R., Saving social security, J. Econ. Perspect., 19, 2, 11-32 (2005)
[18] EPC, 2018. (AWG) and european commission (DG ECFIN). The Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States 2016-2070)Institutional Paper 079.
[19] Fehr, H.; Kallweit, M.; Kindermann, F., Should pensions be progressive?, Eur. Econ. Rev., 63, 94-116 (2013)
[20] Fève, P., Matheron, J., J-G, S., 2013. The laffer curve in an incomplete-market economy. Working Paper no. TSE-288.
[21] Fuster, S.; İmrohoroğlu, A.; İmrohoroğlu, S., Elimination of social security in a dynastic framework, Rev. Econ. Stud., 74, 113-145 (2007) · Zbl 1297.91113
[22] Guner, N.; Kaygusuz, R.; Ventura, G., Taxation and household labour supply, Rev. Econ. Stud., 79, 1113-1149 (2012) · Zbl 1405.91443
[23] Guner, N.; Lopez-Daneri, M.; Ventura, G., Heterogeneity and government revenues: Higher taxes at the top?, J. Monet. Econ., 80, 69-85 (2016)
[24] Hansen, G. D., The cyclical and secular behaviour of the labour input: comparing efficiency units and hours worked, J. Appl. Econometr., 8, 1, 71-80 (1993)
[25] Heathcote, J.; Storesletten, K.; Violante, G. L., Optimal tax progressivity: an analytical framework, Quart. J. Econ., 134, 1693-1754 (2017) · Zbl 1400.91347
[26] Elsevier · Zbl 1402.91362
[27] Heer, B.; Maussner, A., Dynamic general equilibrium modeling, Computational Methods and Applications (2009), Springer-Verlag
[28] Heer, B.; Scharrer, C., The age-specific burdens of short-run fluctuations in government spending, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 90, 45-75 (2018) · Zbl 1401.91378
[29] Holter, H. A., Krueger, D., Stepanchuk, S., 2018. How does tax progressivity and household heterogeneity affect laffer curves?Mimeo.
[30] Huggett, M.; Ventura, G., Understanding why high income households save more than low income households, J. Monet Econ., 45, 361-397 (2000)
[31] İmrohoroğlu, S.; Kitao, S.; Yamada, T., Achieving fiscal balance in japan, Int. Econ. Rev. (Philadelph.), 57, 1, 117-154 (2016) · Zbl 1404.91215
[32] Ríos.-R., J-V., Population changes and capital accumulation: the aging of the baby boom, Adv. Macroecon., 1, 1, 1-46 (2001)
[33] Kitao, S., Sustainable social security: Four options, Rev. Econ. Dyn., 17, 756-779 (2014)
[34] Kitao, S., Policy uncertainty and cost of delaying reform: the case of aging japan, Rev. Econ. Dyn., 27, 81-100 (2018)
[35] Kotlikoff, L. J.; Smetters, K.; Walliser, J., Mitigating america’s demographic dilemma by pre-funding social security, J. Monet. Econ., 54, 247-266 (2007)
[36] Krueger, D.; Ludwig, A., On the consequences of demographic change for rates of returns to capital, and the distribution of wealth and welfare, J. Monet. Econ., 54, 49-87 (2007)
[37] 2016-2642
[38] ESA/P/WP. 242
[39] Nishiyama, S.; Smetters, K., Does social security privatization produce effciency gains?, Quart. J. Econ., 122, 1677-1719 (2007)
[40] OECD, Pensions at a Glance 2015: OECD and G20 Indicators (2015), OECD Publishing, Paris
[41] Park, S. G., Quantifying impact of aging population on fiscal space, Proceedings of the IMF Working Paper No. 164 (2012)
[42] Polito, V.; Wickens, M. R., Modelling the u.s. sovereign credit rating, J. Bank. Finance, 46, 202-218 (2014)
[43] Polito, V.; Wickens, M. R., Sovereign credit ratings in the european union: A model-based fiscal analysis, Eur. Econ. Rev., 78, 220-247 (2015)
[44] RMWJ, B.; Bovenberg, A. L.; Romp, W. E., Funded pensions and intergenerational and international risk sharing in general equilibrium, J. Int. Money Finance, 30, 7, 1516-1534 (2011)
[45] Roser, M.; Ortiz-Ospina, E., Tertiary Education (2019), Published online at OurWorldInData.org
[46] Shiller, R. J., 2005. The life-cycle personal accounts proposal for social security: A review. NBER Working Paper No. 11300.
[47] Trabandt, M.; Uhlig, H., The laffer curve revisited, J. Monet. Econ., 58, 305-327 (2011)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.