×

Solution remapping method with lower bound preservation for Navier-Stokes equations in aerodynamic shape optimization. (English) Zbl 1517.49025

Summary: It is found that the solution remapping technique proposed in [J. Wang et al., Numer. Math., Theory Methods Appl. 13, No. 4, 863–880 (2020; Zbl 1474.49091)] and [J. Wang and T. Liu, J. Sci. Comput. 87, No. 3, Paper No. 79, 26 p. (2021; Zbl 1469.65151)] does not work out for the Navier-Stokes equations with a high Reynolds number. The shape deformations usually reach several boundary layer mesh sizes for viscous flow, which far exceed one-layer mesh that the original method can tolerate. The direct application to Navier-Stokes equations can result in the unphysical pressures in remapped solutions, even though the conservative variables are within the reasonable range. In this work, a new solution remapping technique with lower bound preservation is proposed to construct initial values for the new shapes, and the global minimum density and pressure of the current shape which serve as lower bounds of the corresponding variables are used to constrain the remapped solutions. The solution distribution provided by the present method is proven to be acceptable as an initial value for the new shape. Several numerical experiments show that the present technique can substantially accelerate the flow convergence for large deformation problems with 70%–80% CPU time reduction in the viscous airfoil drag minimization.

MSC:

49Q10 Optimization of shapes other than minimal surfaces
65M12 Stability and convergence of numerical methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
65M22 Numerical solution of discretized equations for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
35Q30 Navier-Stokes equations
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] A. BECKERT AND H. WENDLAND, Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction prob-lems using radial basis functions, Aerospace Science and Technology, 5 (2001), pp. 125-134. · Zbl 1034.74018
[2] M. BHABRA AND S. NADARAJAH, Aerodynamic shape optimization for the NURBS-enhanced discontinuous Galerkin method, in AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, 2019, p. 3197.
[3] J. BLAZEK, Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015. · Zbl 1308.76001
[4] C. M. CHAN, H. BAI, AND D. HE, Blade shape optimization of the savonius wind turbine using a genetic algorithm, Applied Energy, 213 (2018), pp. 148-157.
[5] J. CHENG, X. YANG, X. LIU, T. LIU, AND H. LUO, A direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations on arbitrary grids, Journal of Computational Physics, 327 (2016), pp. 484-502. · Zbl 1373.76285
[6] B. COCKBURN AND C.-W. SHU, The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conserva-tion laws V: Multidimensional systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 141 (1998), pp. 199-224. · Zbl 0920.65059
[7] A. DE BOER, M. S. VAN DER SCHOOT, AND H. BIJL, Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation, Computers & Structures, 85 (2007), pp. 784-795.
[8] R. HARTMANN, Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin methods with shock-capturing for the compress-ible Navier-Stokes equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 51 (2006), pp. 1131-1156. · Zbl 1106.76041
[9] A. JAMESON, W. SCHMIDT, AND E. TURKEL, Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes, in 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, 1981, p. 1259.
[10] L. KALAND, M. SONNTAG, AND N. GAUGER, Adaptive aerodynamic design optimization for Navier-Stokes using shape derivatives with discontinuous Galerkin methods, in Advances in Evo-lutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control in Engineering and Sciences, Springer, 2015, pp. 143-158.
[11] R. J. LEVEQUE ET AL., Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems, vol. 31, Cambridge uni-versity press, 2002. · Zbl 1010.65040
[12] H. LIU AND J. YAN, The direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) methods for diffusion problems, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47 (2009), pp. 675-698. · Zbl 1189.65227
[13] H. LUO, J. D. BAUM, AND R. LÖHNER, A fast, matrix-free implicit method for compressible flows on unstructured grids, Journal of Computational Physics, 146 (1998), pp. 664-690. · Zbl 0931.76045
[14] M. NEMEC, D. W. ZINGG, AND T. H. PULLIAM, Multipoint and multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization, AIAA Journal, 42 (2004), pp. 1057-1065.
[15] Y. SAAD AND M. H. SCHULTZ, GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7 (1986), pp. 856-869. · Zbl 0599.65018
[16] J. C. SPALL, An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 19 (1998), pp. 482-492.
[17] J. C. SPALL, Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Con-trol, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[18] V. SRIPAWADKUL, M. PADULO, AND M. GUENOV, A comparison of airfoil shape parameteriza-tion techniques for early design optimization, in 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, 2010, p. 9050.
[19] J. WANG AND T. LIU, Local-maximum-and-minimum-preserving solution remapping technique to accelerate flow convergence for discontinuous Galerkin methods in shape optimization design, Journal of Scientific Computing, 87 (2021), pp. 1-26. · Zbl 1469.65151
[20] J. WANG, Z. WANG, AND T. LIU, Solution remapping technique to accelerate flow convergence for finite volume methods applied to shape optimization design, Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods & Applications, 13 (2020). · Zbl 1474.49091
[21] K. WANG, S. YU, Z. WANG, R. FENG, AND T. LIU, Adjoint-based airfoil optimization with adaptive isogeometric discontinuous Galerkin method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 344 (2019), pp. 602-625. · Zbl 1440.74278
[22] Z. WANG, A perspective on high-order methods in computational fluid dynamics, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 59 (2016), pp. 1-6.
[23] Z. J. WANG, K. FIDKOWSKI, R. ABGRALL, F. BASSI, D. CARAENI, A. CARY, H. DECON-INCK, R. HARTMANN, K. HILLEWAERT, H. T. HUYNH, ET AL., High-order CFD methods: cur-rent status and perspective, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 72 (2013), pp. 811-845. · Zbl 1455.76007
[24] X. XING AND M. DAMODARAN, Assessment of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approxima-tion method for wing design optimization, Journal of Aircraft, 39 (2002), pp. 379-381.
[25] X. XING AND M. DAMODARAN, Inverse design of transonic airfoils using parallel simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation, Journal of Aircraft, 42 (2005), pp. 568-570.
[26] X. Q. XING AND M. DAMODARAN, Application of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approxi-mation method for aerodynamic shape design optimization, AIAA Journal, 43 (2005), pp. 284-294.
[27] M. ZEINALPOUR, K. MAZAHERI, AND A. IRANNEJAD, Turbine blade aerodynamic optimization on unstructured grids using a continuous adjoint method, in ASME International Mechanical En-gineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 45172, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012, pp. 425-431.
[28] X. ZHANG, On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 328 (2017), pp. 301-343. · Zbl 1406.65091
[29] X. ZHANG AND C.-W. SHU, On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Euler equations on rectangular meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 229 (2010), pp. 8918-8934. · Zbl 1282.76128
[30] S. ZIAEIRAD AND V. A. PISHEH, Aerodynamic design optimisation using genetic algorithm, (2003). · Zbl 1090.76583
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.