×

Poverty as a system: human contestability approach to poverty measurement. (English) Zbl 1516.62373

Summary: Since A. Sen’s paper on poverty measurement [Econometrica 44, 219–231 (1976; Zbl 0349.90017)], a substantial literature, both theoretical and empirical, has emerged. There have been several recent efforts to drive poverty measures based on different approaches and axioms. These poverty indices are based on head count ratio, poverty gaps and distribution of income. These are very narrow in approach and suffer from several drawbacks. However, the purpose of the present paper is to introduce a new poverty measure based on a holistic and system modelling approach. Based on the second author’s human contestability [Poverty in an ethnic community: Asians in West Yorkshire. Leeds: Leeds University of Business School, University of Leeds (PhD thesis) (2003); Poverty as human contestability failure. Leeds: Wisdom House Publ. (2007)] approach to poverty, this new approach to measuring poverty has been developed using a structure equation model based on G. K. Kanji’s business excellence model [Measuring business excellence. Abingdon: Routledge (2002)] to create the proposed poverty model. We construct a latent variable structural equation model to measure the contestability excellence within certain boundaries of the societal system. It will provide us with a measurement of poverty in a society or community in terms of human contestability. A higher human contestability index will indicate the lower poverty within the society. Strengths and weakness as of various components will also indicate that a characteristic of the individual requires extra society or government support to remove poverty. However, there remains considerable disagreement on the best way to achieve this.

MSC:

62-XX Statistics

Citations:

Zbl 0349.90017
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abel-Smith, B. and Townsend, P. 1965. The Poor and The Poorest, London: G. Bell and Sons.
[2] Atkinson, A. B. 1985. On the Measurement of Poverty, 53 ESRC Programme on Taxation, Incentives and Distribution of Income, Working Paper 90, London School of Economics. public action, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia
[3] Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. and Willig, R. 1982. Contestable markets and the theory of industrial structure. American Economic Review, 72
[4] Beckerman, W. 1979. The impact of maintenance payments on poverty in Britain. The Economic Journal, 89(354) June · doi:10.2307/2231601
[5] Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. 1980. Ethical indices for the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 48: 1053-60. · Zbl 0442.90011 · doi:10.2307/1912947
[6] Bradbury, B. 1989. Family size equivalence scales and survey evaluations of income and well-being. Journal of Social Policy, 18(3): 383-409. · doi:10.1017/S0047279400017621
[7] Chopra, P. K. 2003. “Poverty in an ethnic community: Asians in West Yorkshire”. Leeds, , UK: Leeds University Business School, The University of Leeds. PhD Dissertation in Economics
[8] Chopra, P. K. 2007. Poverty as Human Contestability Failure, Leeds: Wisdom House Publications.
[9] Clark, S. R., Hemming, R. and Ulph, D. 1981. On indices for the measurement of poverty. Economic Journal, 91: 515-526. · doi:10.2307/2232600
[10] Dubnoff, S. 1985. How much income is enough? Measuring public judgements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49: 285-299.
[11] Foster, J. E. and Shorrocks, A. F. 1991. Subgroup-consistent poverty indexes. Econometrica, 52: 687-709. · Zbl 0735.90029
[12] Foster, J. E., Greer, J. and Thorbecke, E. 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52: 761-766. · Zbl 0555.90029 · doi:10.2307/1913475
[13] Frayman, H. 1992. “Breadline Britain-1990”s: The Findings of the Television Series”. London: Domino Films for London Weekend Television.
[14] Hicks, N. and Streeteen, P. 1979. Indicators of development: the search for a basic needs yard stick. World Development, 7(6): 567-80. · doi:10.1016/0305-750X(79)90093-7
[15] Kanji, G. K. 2002. Measuring Business Excellence, UK: Routledge.
[16] Kanji, G. K., Moura, E. and Sa, P. 2006. Performance Measurement: The Path to Excellence, UK: Wisdom House Publication Ltd.
[17] Kakwani, N. 1980. On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica, 48(2): 438-439. · Zbl 0436.90036 · doi:10.2307/1911106
[18] Kudu, A. and Smith, T. 1983. An impossibility theorem for poverty indices. International Economic Review, 24: 423-34. · Zbl 0531.90019
[19] Kundu, A. 1981. Measurement of poverty. Anvesak, 6(1) June
[20] Mack, J. and Lansley, S. 1985. Poor Britain, London: Allen & Unwin.
[21] Muffels, R. and Vrien, M. 1991. The Comparison of Definitions of Consumption Deprivation and Income Deprivation, Mimeo: Tilburg University.
[22] Orshansky, M. 1969. How poverty is measured?. Monthly Labour Review, 92
[23] Rowntree, B. S. 1901. Poverty - A Study of Town Life, London: Macmillan.
[24] Sen, A. K. 1976. Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44: 219-231. · Zbl 0349.90017 · doi:10.2307/1912718
[25] Sen, A. K. 1981. Poverty and Famines - An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[26] Sen, A. K. 1984. Resources, Values and Development, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[27] Sen, A. K. 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press. · Zbl 0976.00002
[28] Shorrocks, A. F. 1995. Revisiting the Sen Poverty Index. Econometrica, 63(5): 1225 · Zbl 0843.90025 · doi:10.2307/2171728
[29] Takayama, N. 1979. Poverty and inequality and their measures: Professor Sen’s Axiomatic Approach Reconsidered. Econometrica, 47(3) · Zbl 0421.90021 · doi:10.2307/1910420
[30] Thon, D. 1979. On measuring poverty. Review of Income and Wealth, 25: 429-439. · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.1979.tb00117.x
[31] Townsend, P. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
[32] Townsend, P. and Gorden, D. 1989. “What is enough? New evidence a poverty in Greater London allowing the definition of a minimum benefit. Memorandum of evidence to the House of Commens Social Services Select Committee an Minimum Income”. Vol. 579, 45-78. London: HMSO.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.