×

The cross-product ratio in bivariate lognormal and gamma distributions, with an application to non-randomized trials. (English) Zbl 1511.62107

Summary: Non-randomized trials can give a biased impression of the effectiveness of any intervention. We consider trials in which incidence rates are compared in two areas over two periods. Typically, one area receives an intervention, whereas the other does not. We outline and illustrate a method to estimate the bias in such trials under two different bivariate models. The illustrations use data in which no particular intervention is operating. The purpose is to illustrate the size of the bias that could be observed purely due to regression towards the mean (RTM). The illustrations show that the bias can be appreciably different from zero, and even when centred on zero, the variance of the bias can be large. We conclude that the results of non-randomized trials should be treated with caution, as interventions which show small effects could be explained as artefacts of RTM.

MSC:

62H10 Multivariate distribution of statistics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Brillinger, D. R. 1975. “Estimation of product densities”. In Computer Science and Statistics: 8th Annual Symposium UCLA Edited by: Frane, J. W. 431-438. Los Angeles, , USA
[2] Farrington, D. P. and Welsh, B. C. 2002. “The effects of improved street lighting on crime: A systematic review”. In Home Office Research Study 251, London, , UK: Home Office. Available at http://www.homeo_ce.gov.uk/rds/ pdfs2/hors251.pdf
[3] Fienberg, S. E. 1977. The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data, Cambridge: MIT Press.
[4] Hutchinson, T. P. and Lai, C. D. 1990. Continuous Bivariate Distribution Emphasising Applications, Adelaide: Rumsby Scientific Publishing. · Zbl 1170.62330
[5] Izawa, T. 1965. Two or multi-dimensional gamma-type distribution and its application to rainfall data. Papers Meteorol. Geophys., 15: 167-200. · doi:10.2467/mripapers1950.15.3-4_167
[6] Karavasilis, G. J., Kotti, V. K., Tsitsis, D. S., Vassiliadis, V. G. and Rigas, A. G. 2005. Statistical methods and software for risk assessment: Applications to a neurophysiological data set. Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 49: 243-263. · Zbl 1429.62555 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.05.010
[7] King, D. 2007. Government Office for Science: Science review of the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice, London, , UK: Home Office. Available at http://www.dius.gov.uk/publications/homojsciencereview.pdf
[8] Kmietowicz, Z. W. 1984. The bivariate lognormal model for the distribution of household size and income. Manchest. School, 52: 196-210. · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1984.tb00778.x
[9] Leigh, A., Arnott, J., Clarke, G. and See, L. Family values: Grouping similar policing and crime reduction areas for comparative purposes, London, , UK: Home Office. 2000. Available at http://www.homeo_ce.gov.uk/ rds/prgpdfs/brf300.pdf
[10] Luige, T. and Vikan, S. T. 2003. “Trends in Europe and North America - 2003 Statistical Yearboook of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe”. Geneva: United Nations Sales. Available at http://www.unece.org/stats/trend/trendh.htm
[11] Moran, P. A.P. 1969. Statistical inference with bivariate gamma distributions. Biometrika, 56: 627-634. · Zbl 0184.42702 · doi:10.1093/biomet/56.3.627
[12] Nicholas, S., Povey, D., Walker, A. and Kershaw, C. 2005. “Crime in England and Wales 2004/05, 2005”. In Home Office Statistical Bulletin 11/05, London, , UK: Home Office. Available at http://www.homeo_ce.gov.uk/rds/crimeew0405.html
[13] Rice, J. A. 1995. Mathematical Statistics & Data Analysis, Belmont: Duxbury Press. · Zbl 0868.62006
[14] Royston, P. 1982. An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Appl. Statist., 31: 115-124. · Zbl 0503.62037 · doi:10.2307/2347973
[15] Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. and MacKenzie, D. I. 2002. Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, London: Routledge. · doi:10.4324/9780203166697
[16] Szekely, G. J. and Rizzo, M. L. 2004. Testing for equal distributions in high dimension. InterStat, 5 Available at http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2004/abstracts/041105
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.