×

Better product quality may lead to lower product price. (English) Zbl 1508.91190

Summary: This article analyzes the conditions under which better product quality implies higher or lower product price. In an optimal control framework, I make the following assumptions: The firm sets the dynamic pricing and product innovation policies; product innovation raises quality, which drives production cost, and consumers are sensitive to price and quality. I derive a rule of price-quality relationship that stresses the influence of quality on price through the effects of cost (positive), sales (negative), and markup (positive). This article shows that, while maximizing profit and despite a quality and cost increases, the firm may decrease product prices because of the possibility of generating more sales as a result of combining better quality with lower price. This sales effect solves the puzzle of a negative price-quality relationship. More generally, the sales effect mitigates the ability of price to convey information about quality.

MSC:

91B24 Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets)
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Acharyya, R. 1998. “Monopoly and Product Quality: Separating or Pooling Menu?” Economics Letters 61 (2):187-94.; Acharyya, R., Monopoly and Product Quality: Separating or Pooling Menu?”, Economics Letters, 61, 2, 187-94 (1998) · Zbl 0912.90037
[2] Adner, R., and D. Levinthal. 2001. “Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation.” Management Science 47 (5):611-28.; Adner, R.; Levinthal, D., Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation, Management Science, 47, 5, 611-28 (2001)
[3] Bagwell, K., and M. H. Riordan. 1991. “High and Declining Prices Signal Product Quality.” American Economic Review 28 (1):224-39.; Bagwell, K.; Riordan, M. H., High and Declining Prices Signal Product Quality, American Economic Review, 28, 1, 224-39 (1991)
[4] Bayus, B. L. 1995. “Optimal Dynamic Policies for Product and Process Innovation.” Journal of Operations Management 12 (3):173-85.; Bayus, B. L., Optimal Dynamic Policies for Product and Process Innovation, Journal of Operations Management, 12, 3, 173-85 (1995)
[5] Caulkins, J. P., G. Feichtinger, D. Grass, R. F. Hartl, P. M. Kort, and A. Seidl. 2015. “History-dependence generated by the interaction of pricing, advertising and experience quality.” Technical Report Research Report 2015-05, Vienna University of Technology.; Caulkins, J. P.; Feichtinger, G.; Grass, D.; Hartl, R. F.; Kort, P. M.; Seidl, A. (2015) · Zbl 1394.90374
[6] Chatterjee, R. 2009. “Strategic Pricing of New Product and Services.” In Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing, edited by V. Rao, 169-215. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.; Chatterjee, R.; Rao, V., Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing, 169-215 (2009)
[7] Chenavaz, R. 2011. “Dynamic Pricing Rule and R&D.” Economics Bulletin 31 (3):2229-36.; Chenavaz, R., Dynamic Pricing Rule and R&D, Economics Bulletin, 31, 3, 2229-36 (2011) · Zbl 1253.91093
[8] Chenavaz, R. 2012. “Dynamic Pricing, Product and Process Innovation.” European Journal of Operational Research 222 (3):553-7.; Chenavaz, R., Dynamic Pricing, Product and Process Innovation, European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 3, 553-7 (2012) · Zbl 1253.91093
[9] Chenavaz, R., L.-P., L. Etienne Carrier, and C. Paraschiv. 2011. “Dynamic Pricing in Management Science.” Journal of Economic Studies and Research 10. doi:.; Chenavaz, R.; P, L.; Carrier, L. Etienne; Paraschiv, C., Dynamic Pricing in Management Science, Journal of Economic Studies and Research, 10 (2011)
[10] Den Boer, A. V. 2015. “Dynamic Pricing and Learning: Historical Origins, Current Research, and New Directions.” Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science 20 (1):1-18.; Den Boer, A. V., Dynamic Pricing and Learning: Historical Origins, Current Research, and New Directions, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 20, 1, 1-18 (2015)
[11] Dockner, E., S. Jorgenssen, V. N. Long, and S. Gerhard. 2000. Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; Dockner, E.; Jorgenssen, S.; Long, V. N.; Gerhard, S., Differential Games in Economics and Management Science (2000) · Zbl 0996.91001
[12] Ellingsen, T. 1997. “Price Signals Quality: The Case of Perfectly Inelastic Demand.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (1):43-61.; Ellingsen, T., Price Signals Quality: The Case of Perfectly Inelastic Demand, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 1, 43-61 (1997) · Zbl 0882.90025
[13] Gardner, D. 1971. “Is there a Generalized Price-Quality Relationship?” Journal of Marketing Research 8 (2):241-3.; Gardner, D., Is there a Generalized Price-Quality Relationship?”, Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 2, 241-3 (1971)
[14] Gavious, A., and O. Lowengart. 2012. “Price-Quality Relationship in the Presence of Asymmetric Dynamic Reference Quality Effects.” Marketing Letters 23 (1):137-61.; Gavious, A.; Lowengart, O., Price-Quality Relationship in the Presence of Asymmetric Dynamic Reference Quality Effects, Marketing Letters, 23, 1, 137-61 (2012) · Zbl 1165.91325
[15] Gerstner, E. 1985. “Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality?” Journal of Marketing Research 22 (2):209-15.; Gerstner, E., Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality?”, Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 2, 209-15 (1985)
[16] Janssen, M. C., and S. Roy. 2010. “Signaling Quality through Prices in an Oligopoly.” Games and Economic Behavior 68 (1):192-207.; Janssen, M. C.; Roy, S., Signaling Quality through Prices in an Oligopoly, Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 1, 192-207 (2010) · Zbl 1197.91099
[17] Jin, G. Z., and A. Kato. 2006. “Price, Quality, and Reputation: Evidence from an Online Field Experiment.” The RAND Journal of Economics 37 (4):983-1005.; Jin, G. Z.; Kato, A., Price, Quality, and Reputation: Evidence from an Online Field Experiment, The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 4, 983-1005 (2006)
[18] Jørgensen, S., and G. Zaccour. 2012. Differential Games in Marketing, Volume 15. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.; Jørgensen, S.; Zaccour, G., Differential Games in Marketing, 15 (2012) · Zbl 0878.90021
[19] Judd, K. L., and M. H. Riordan. 1994. “Price and Quality in a New Product Monopoly.” Review of Economic Studies 61 (4):773-89.; Judd, K. L.; Riordan, M. H., Price and Quality in a New Product Monopoly, Review of Economic Studies, 61, 4, 773-89 (1994) · Zbl 0813.90024
[20] Lambertini, L., and A. Mantovani. 2009. “Process and Product Innovation by a Multiproduct Monopolist: A Dynamic Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 27 (4):508-18.; Lambertini, L.; Mantovani, A., Process and Product Innovation by a Multiproduct Monopolist: A Dynamic Approach, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27, 4, 508-18 (2009) · Zbl 1402.91291
[21] Li, G., and S. Rajagopalan. 1998. “Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects.” Management Science 44 (11-part-1):1517-32.; Li, G.; Rajagopalan, S., Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects, Management Science, 44, 11-1, 1517-32 (1998) · Zbl 0988.90512
[22] Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1986. Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality.“ Journal of Political Economy 94 (4):796-821.<pub-id pub-id-type=”doi“>10.1086/261408; <element-citation publication-type=”journal“ publication-format=”print”>Milgrom, PRoberts, J.1986Price and Advertising Signals of Product QualityJournal of Political Economy944796821
[23] Monroe, K. B., and W. B. Dodds. 1988. “A Research Program for Establishing the Validity of the Price-Quality Relationship.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1):151-68.; Monroe, K. B.; Dodds, W. B., A Research Program for Establishing the Validity of the Price-Quality Relationship, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1, 151-68 (1988)
[24] Mukhopadhyay, S. K., and P. Kouvelis. 1997. “A Differential Game Theoretic Model for Duopolistic Competition on Design Quality.” Operations Research 45 (6):886-93.; Mukhopadhyay, S. K.; Kouvelis, P., A Differential Game Theoretic Model for Duopolistic Competition on Design Quality, Operations Research, 45, 6, 886-93 (1997) · Zbl 0895.90033
[25] Mulligan, C. B., and X. Sala-i Martin. 1991. “A Note on the Time-Elimination Method for Solving Recursive Dynamic Economic Models.” NBER Working Papers 116.; Mulligan, C. B.; Sala-i Martin, X. (1991)
[26] Mussa, M., and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economic Theory 18 (2):301-17.; Mussa, M.; Rosen, S., Monopoly and Product Quality, Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 2, 301-17 (1978) · Zbl 0403.90007
[27] Rubel, O. 2013. “Stochastic Competitive Entries and Dynamic Pricing.” European Journal of Operational Research 231 (2):381-92.; Rubel, O., Stochastic Competitive Entries and Dynamic Pricing, European Journal of Operational Research, 231, 2, 381-92 (2013) · Zbl 1317.91018
[28] Saha, S. 2007. “Consumer Preferences and Product and Process R&D.” The RAND Journal of Economics 38 (1):250-68.; Saha, S., Consumer Preferences and Product and Process R&D, The RAND Journal of Economics, 38, 1, 250-68 (2007)
[29] Scitovsky, T. 1944. “Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price.” Review of Economic Studies 12 (2):100-5.; Scitovsky, T., Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price, Review of Economic Studies, 12, 2, 100-5 (1944)
[30] Shy, O. 2001. The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; Shy, O., The Economics of Network Industries (2001) · Zbl 1005.68051
[31] Spence, M. 1975. “Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics 6 (2):417-29.; Spence, M., Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation, Bell Journal of Economics, 6, 2, 417-29 (1975)
[32] Stiglitz, J. 1987. “The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price.” Journal of Economic Literature 25 (1):1-48.; Stiglitz, J., The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price, Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 1, 1-48 (1987)
[33] Sun, C.-J. 2014. Dynamic Price Discrimination with Customer Recognition.“ The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 14 (1):217-50.; <element-citation publication-type=”journal“ publication-format=”print”>Sun, C.-J2014Dynamic Price Discrimination with Customer RecognitionThe BE Journal of Theoretical Economics14121750 · Zbl 1375.91086
[34] Tapiero, C. S., P. H. Ritchken, and A. Reisman. 1987. “Reliability, Pricing and Quality Control.” European Journal of Operational Research 31 (1):37-45.; Tapiero, C. S.; Ritchken, P. H.; Reisman, A., Reliability, Pricing and Quality Control, European Journal of Operational Research, 31, 1, 37-45 (1987) · Zbl 0614.90014
[35] Teng, J.-T., and G. L. Thompson. 1996. “Optimal Strategies for General Price-Quality Decision Models of New Products with Learning Production Costs.” European Journal of Operational Research 93 (3):476-89.; Teng, J.-T; Thompson, G. L., Optimal Strategies for General Price-Quality Decision Models of New Products with Learning Production Costs, European Journal of Operational Research, 93, 3, 476-89 (1996) · Zbl 0912.90191
[36] Völckner, F., and J. Hofmann. 2007. “The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Determinants.” Marketing Letters 18 (3):181-96.; Völckner, F.; Hofmann, J., The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Determinants, Marketing Letters, 18, 3, 181-96 (2007)
[37] Vörös, J. 2006. “The Dynamics of Price, Quality and Productivity Improvement Decisions.” European Journal of Operational Research 170 (3):809-23.; Vörös, J., The Dynamics of Price, Quality and Productivity Improvement Decisions, European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 3, 809-23 (2006) · Zbl 1203.91126
[38] Vörös, J. 2013. “Multi-Period Models for Analyzing the Dynamics of Process Improvement Activities.” European Journal of Operational Research 230 (3):615-23.; Vörös, J., Multi-Period Models for Analyzing the Dynamics of Process Improvement Activities, European Journal of Operational Research, 230, 3, 615-23 (2013) · Zbl 1317.90149
[39] Wolinsky, A. 1983. “Prices as Signals of Product Quality.” Review of Economic Studies 50 (4):647-58.; Wolinsky, A., Prices as Signals of Product Quality, Review of Economic Studies, 50, 4, 647-58 (1983) · Zbl 0521.90028
[40] Xue, M., W. Tang, and J. Zhang. 2016. “Optimal Dynamic Pricing for Deteriorating Items with Reference-Price Effects.” International Journal of Systems Science 47 (9):2022-31.; 2020-01-09 07:46:58 Citation within text. · Zbl 1410.91239
[41] Yan, D., and J. Sengupta. 2011. “Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship.” Journal of Consumer Research 38 (2):376-89.; Yan, D.; Sengupta, J., Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship, Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 2, 376-89 (2011)
[42] Zhang, J., W.-y. Kevin Chiang, and L. Liang. 2014. “Strategic Pricing with Reference Effects in a Competitive Supply Chain.” Omega 44:126-35.; Zhang, J.; Kevin Chiang, W.-y.; Liang, L., Strategic Pricing with Reference Effects in a Competitive Supply Chain, Omega, 44, 126-35 (2014)
[43] Zhou, K. Z., C. Su, and Y. Bao. 2002. “A Paradox of Price-Quality and Market Efficiency: A Comparative Study of the Us and China Markets.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 19 (4):349-65.; Zhou, K. Z.; Su, C.; Bao, Y., A Paradox of Price-Quality and Market Efficiency: A Comparative Study of the Us and China Markets, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 4, 349-65 (2002)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.