×

Which strategy is better for managing multi-product demand uncertainty: inventory substitution or probabilistic selling? (English) Zbl 1507.90017

Summary: Firms generally sell multiple products whose demands are uncertain. In order to manage product demand uncertainty, some firms use inventory substitution, while others use probabilistic selling. Which strategy should firms adopt is an intriguing issue. Addressing this issue, we consider a retailer that sells two substitutable products whose demands are uncertain. Based on the newsboy model, we analyze the optimal pricing and inventory decisions under the two strategies in three total market size situations, namely deterministic, discrete random, and general random. We derive closed-form optimal solutions for the former two situations and numerically find the optimal solution for the latter situation. We then compare the optimal profits under the two strategies in the three situations. We show that probabilistic selling always performs better than inventory substitution and brings more benefits to the retailer. These findings can explain that more and more firms adopt probabilistic selling in reality.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Anderson, C. K.; Fredrik, G.; Wilson, J., A newsvendor approach to inventory and pricing decisions in NYOP channels, Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 14, 1, 3-18 (2015)
[2] Anderson, C. K.; Xie, X., A choice-based dynamic programming approach for setting opaque prices, Production & Operations Management, 21, 3, 590-605 (2012)
[3] Anderson, C. K.; Xie, X., Pricing and market segmentation using opaque selling mechanisms, European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 1, 263-272 (2014) · Zbl 1339.91057
[4] Bai, S.; Yan, Z.; Liu, L., Optimizing variable opaque product design in E-commerce based on blind booking, Procedia Computer Science, 60, 1676-1686 (2015)
[5] Baloch, G.; Gzara, F., Capacity and assortment planning under one-way supplier-driven substitution for pharmacy kiosks with low drug demand, European Journal of Operational Research, 282, 1, 108-128 (2020) · Zbl 1430.90571
[6] Cai, G.; Chen, Y. J.; Wu, C.; Lu, H., Probabilistic selling, channel structure, and supplier competition, Decision Sciences, 44, 2, 267-296 (2013)
[7] Deflem, Y.; Van Nieuwenhuyse, I., Managing inventories with one-way substitution: A newsvendor analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 3, 484-493 (2013) · Zbl 1317.90021
[8] Dong, L.; Kouvelis, P.; Tian, Z., Dynamic pricing and inventory control of substitute products, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11, 2, 317-339 (2009)
[9] Ernst, R.; Kouvelis, P., The effects of selling packaged goods on inventory decisions, Management Science, 45, 8, 1142-1155 (1999) · Zbl 1231.90027
[10] Fay, S., Selling an opaque product through an intermediary: The case of disguising one’s product, Journal of Retailing, 84, 1, 59-75 (2008)
[11] Fay, S.; Xie, J., Probabilistic goods: A creative way of selling products and services, Marketing Science, 27, 4, 674-690 (2008)
[12] Fay, S.; Xie, J., The economics of buyer uncertainty: Advance selling vs. probabilistic selling, Marketing Science, 29, 6, 1040-1057 (2010)
[13] Fay, S.; Xie, J., A new mechanism to manage inventory decisions under demand uncertainty: Probabilistic selling (2011), Social Science Electronic Publishing
[14] Fay, S.; Xie, J., Timing of product allocation: Using probabilistic selling to enhance inventory management, Management Science, 61, 2, 474-484 (2015)
[15] Feng, B.; Liu, W.; Mao, Z., Use of opaque sales channels in addition to traditional channels by service providers, International Journal of Production Research, 56, 10, 3369-3383 (2018)
[16] Gallego, G., & Kim, S. (2020). Joint pricing and inventory decisions for substitutable products. Available at SSRN 3513274.
[17] Gaur, V.; Honhon, D., Assortment planning and inventory decisions under a locational choice model, Management Science, 52, 10, 1528-1543 (2006) · Zbl 1232.90050
[18] Gönsch, J., How much to tell your customer? A survey of three perspectives on selling strategies with incompletely specified products, European Journal of Operational Research, 280, 3, 793-817 (2020)
[19] Goyal, V.; Levi, R.; Segev, D., Near-optimal algorithms for the assortment planning problem under dynamic substitution and stochastic demand, Operations Research, 64, 1, 219-235 (2016) · Zbl 1336.90049
[20] Granados, N.; Han, K.; Zhang, D., Demand and revenue impacts of an opaque channel: Evidence from the airline industry, Production and Operations Management, 27, 11, 2010-2014 (2017)
[21] Honhon, D.; Gaur, V.; Seshadri, S., Assortment planning and inventory decisions under stockout-based substitution, Operations Research, 58, 5, 1364-1379 (2010) · Zbl 1233.90022
[22] Hopp, W. J.; Xu, X., A static approximation for dynamic demand substitution with applications in a competitive market, Operations Research, 56, 3, 630-645 (2008) · Zbl 1167.90330
[23] Hotelling, H., Stability in competition, The Economic Journal, 39, 41-57 (1929)
[24] Huang, T.; Yu, Y., Sell probabilistic goods? A behavioral explanation for opaque selling, Marketing Science, 33, 5, 743-759 (2014)
[25] Huang, W. J.; Chen, C. C.; Lai, Y. M., Five-star quality at three-star prices? Opaque booking and hotel service expectations, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27, 7, 833-854 (2018)
[26] Karakul, M.; Chan, L. M.A., Analytical and managerial implications of integrating product substitutability in the joint pricing and procurement problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 190, 1, 179-204 (2008) · Zbl 1146.90316
[27] Mahajan, S.; Van Ryzin, G., Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution, Operations Research, 49, 3, 334-351 (2001) · Zbl 1163.90339
[28] Mcgillivray, R.; Silver, E., Some Concepts For Inventory Control Under Substitutable Demand, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 16, 1, 47-63 (1978) · Zbl 0384.90037
[29] Netessine, S.; Rudi, N., Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution, Operations Research, 51, 2, 329-335 (2003) · Zbl 1163.90344
[30] Parlar, M.; Goyal, S. K., Optimal ordering decisions for multiple substitutable products with stochastic demands, Opsearch, 21, 1, 1-15 (1984) · Zbl 0545.90030
[31] Rajram, K. T.; Christopher, S., The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising, European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 3, 582-601 (2001) · Zbl 0989.90050
[32] Rice, D. H.; Fay, S. A.; Xie, J., Probabilistic selling vs. markdown selling: Price discrimination and management of demand uncertainty in retailing, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31, 2, 147-155 (2014)
[33] Ramasamy, A. (2018). What is the future of global subscription in the e-commerce industry? Entrepreneur. Available at https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/313813.
[34] Smith, S. A.; Agrawal, N., Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution, Operations Research, 48, 1, 50-64 (2000) · Zbl 1106.90306
[35] Tappata, M. E., Strategic vertical market structure with opaque products (2012), Available at SSRN: 10.2139/ssrn.1980970
[36] Transchel, S., Inventory management under price-based and stockout-based substitution, European Journal of Operational Research, 262, 3, 996-1008 (2017) · Zbl 1375.90024
[37] Wan, M.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, L., Demand estimation under multi-store multi-product substitution in high density traditional retail, European Journal of Operational Research, 266, 1, 99-111 (2018) · Zbl 1403.90059
[38] Wei, J.; Tu, F., Inventory Decision with Two Substitutable Products, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 2221-2225 (2007)
[39] Wu, Y.; Jin, S., Joint pricing and inventory decision under a probabilistic selling strategy, Operational Research, 1-25 (2020)
[40] Zhang, Y.; Hua, G.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J., Managing demand uncertainty: Probabilistic selling versus inventory substitution, International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 1, 56-67 (2018), 2018
[41] Zhang, Z.; Joseph, K.; Subramaniam, R., Probabilistic selling in quality-differentiated markets, Management Science, 61, 8, 1959-1977 (2015)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.