×

Logically-geometrical similarity for algebras and models with the same identities. (English) Zbl 1506.08010

Summary: The paper is related to the field which we call Universal Algebraic Geometry (UAG). All algebras under consideration belong to a variety of algebras \(\Theta\). For an arbitrary \(\Theta\) we construct a system of notions which lead to a bunch of new problems. As a rule, their solutions depend on the choice of specific \(\Theta\). It can be the variety of groups \(Grp\), the variety of associative or Lie algebras, etc. In particular, it can be the classical variety \(Com-P\) of commutative and associative algebras with a unit over a field.
For example, the paper concerns with the following general problem. For every algebra \(H\in\Theta\) one can define the category of algebraic sets over \(H\). Given \(H_1\) and \(H_2\) in \(\Theta\), the question is what are the relations between these algebras that provide an isomorphism of the corresponding categories of algebraic sets. Similar problem stands with respect to the situation when algebras are replaced by models and categories of algebraic sets are replaced by categories of definable sets. The results on the stated problem are applicable to knowledge theory and, in particular, to knowledge bases.

MSC:

08C05 Categories of algebras
03G27 Abstract algebraic logic
14A99 Foundations of algebraic geometry
Full Text: MNR

References:

[1] [1] Mashevitzky G., Plotkin B., Plotkin E., “Automorphisms of categories of free algebras of varieties”, ERA of AMS, 8 (2002), 1–10 · Zbl 0996.08008
[2] [2] Plotkin B., Plotkin E., “Multi-sorted logic and logical geometry: some problems”, Demonstratio Mathematica, XLVIII:4 (2015), 578–618 · Zbl 1344.08003
[3] [3] Journal of Math. Sciences, 137:5 (2006), 5049– 5097 · Zbl 1181.03064 · doi:10.1007/s10958-006-0288-2
[4] [4] Hodges W., Model theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 42, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993 · Zbl 0789.03031
[5] [5] Marker D., Model Theory: An Introduction, Springer Verlag, 2002 · Zbl 1003.03034
[6] [6] Plotkin B., Seven lectures on the universal algebraic geometry, 2002, 87 pp., arXiv:
[7] [7] Plotkin B., Aladova E., Plotkin E., “Algebraic logic and logically-geometric types in varieties of algebras”, Journal of Algebra and its Applications, 12:2 (2013), 1250146, 23 pp. · Zbl 1297.03022 · doi:10.1142/S0219498812501460
[8] [8] Halmos P. R., Algebraic logic, New York, 1969 · Zbl 0101.01101
[9] [9] Aladova E., Plotkin E., Plotkin T., “Isotypeness of models and knowledge bases equivalence”, Mathematics in CS, 7:4 (2013), 421–438 · Zbl 1319.68213
[10] [10] Plotkin B., Universal algebra algebraic logic and databases, Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1994 · Zbl 0785.68025
[11] [11] Pinter C., “A simpler set of axioms for polyadic algebras”, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 79:3 (1973), 223–232 · Zbl 0266.02035
[12] [12] Pinter C., “A simple algebra of first-order logic”, Notre Dame journal of Formal Logic, XIV:14 (1973), 361–366 · Zbl 0245.02053 · doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093891000
[13] [13] Galler B., “Cylindric and polyadic algebras”, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 8 (1957), 176–183 · Zbl 0087.25101 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1957-0086031-7
[14] [14] Mac Lane S., Categories for the Working Mathematician, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 5, New York–Berlin, 1971 · Zbl 0232.18001
[15] [15] Plotkin B., “Algebras with the same algebraic geometry”, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 242, 2003, 176–207 · Zbl 1062.08012
[16] [16] Aladova E., Gvaramia A., Plotkin B., Plotkin T., “Multi-sorted logic, models and logical geometry”, Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, 19:3 (2014), 5–22 · Zbl 1344.08006
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.