×

On strongly rigid hyperfluctuating random measures. (English) Zbl 1501.60011

Summary: In contrast to previous belief, we provide examples of stationary ergodic random measures that are both hyperfluctuating and strongly rigid. Therefore we study hyperplane intersection processes (HIPs) that are formed by the vertices of Poisson hyperplane tessellations. These HIPs are known to be hyperfluctuating, that is, the variance of the number of points in a bounded observation window grows faster than the size of the window. Here we show that the HIPs exhibit a particularly strong rigidity property. For any bounded Borel set \(B\), an exponentially small (bounded) stopping set suffices to reconstruct the position of all points in \(B\) and, in fact, all hyperplanes intersecting \(B\). Therefore the random measures supported by the hyperplane intersections of arbitrary (but fixed) dimension, are also hyperfluctuating. Our examples aid the search for relations between correlations, density fluctuations, and rigidity properties.

MSC:

60D05 Geometric probability and stochastic geometry
60G55 Point processes (e.g., Poisson, Cox, Hawkes processes)
60G57 Random measures

References:

[1] Baumstark, V. and Last, G. (2009). Gamma distributions for stationary Poisson flat processes. Adv. Appl. Prob.41, 911-939. · Zbl 1193.60067
[2] Bufetov, A. I. (2016). Rigidity of determinantal point processes with the Airy, the Bessel and the Gamma kernel. Bull. Math. Sci.6.1, 163-172. · Zbl 1335.60075
[3] Dereudre, D., Hardy, A., Leblé, T. and Maïda, M. (2020). DLR equations and rigidity for the Sine-beta process. Commun. Pure Appl. Math.74, 172-222. · Zbl 1467.82013
[4] Ghosh, S. and Krishnapur, M. (2021). Rigidity hierarchy in random point fields: random polynomials and determinantal processes. Commun. Math. Phys.388, 1205-1234. · Zbl 1489.60084
[5] Ghosh, S. and Lebowitz, J. L. (2017). Fluctuations, large deviations and rigidity in hyperuniform systems: a brief survey. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.48, 609-631. · Zbl 1390.60104
[6] Ghosh, S. and Lebowitz, J. L. (2017). Number rigidity in superhomogeneous random point fields. J. Statist. Phys.166, 1016-1027. · Zbl 1362.60047
[7] Ghosh, S. and Lebowitz, J. L. (2018). Generalized stealthy hyperuniform processes: maximal rigidity and the bounded holes conjecture. Commun. Math. Phys.363, 97-110. · Zbl 1401.60096
[8] Ghosh, S. and Peres, Y. (2017). Rigidity and tolerance in point processes: Gaussian zeros and Ginibre eigenvalues. Duke Math. J.166, 1789-1858. · Zbl 1405.60067
[9] Heinrich, L., Schmidt, H. and Schmidt, V. (2006). Central limit theorems for Poisson hyperplane tessellations. Ann. Appl. Prob.16, 919-950. · Zbl 1132.60023
[10] Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. · Zbl 0996.60001
[11] Klatt, M. A., Last, G. and Yogeshwaran, D. (2020). Hyperuniform and rigid stable matchings. Random Struct. Algorithms57, 439-473. · Zbl 1456.60121
[12] Lachièze-Rey, R. (2020). Variance linearity for real Gaussian zeros. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Prob. Statist., to appear. Available at arXiv:2006.10341.
[13] Last, G. and Penrose, M. (2017). Lectures on the Poisson Process. Cambridge University Press.
[14] Last, G., Penrose, M. P., Schulte, M. and Thäle, C. (2014). Moments and central limit theorems for some multivariate Poisson functionals. Adv. Appl. Prob.46, 348-364. · Zbl 1350.60020
[15] Molchanov, I. (2017). Theory of Random Sets, 2nd edn. Springer, London. · Zbl 1406.60006
[16] Peres, Y. and Sly, A. (2014). Rigidity and tolerance for perturbed lattices. Available at arXiv:1409.4490.
[17] Schneider, R. (2019). Interaction of Poisson hyperplane processes and convex bodies. J. Appl. Prob.56, 1020-1032. · Zbl 1427.60027
[18] Schneider, R. and Weil, W. (2008). Stochastic and Integral Geometry. Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 1175.60003
[19] Torquato, S. (2018). Hyperuniform states of matter. Phys. Rep.745, 1-95. · Zbl 1392.82056
[20] Torquato, S. and Stillinger, F. H. (2003). Local density fluctuations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics. Phys. Rev. E68, 41-113.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.