×

Transparency and collateral: central versus bilateral clearing. (English) Zbl 1489.91291

Summary: This paper studies the optimal clearing arrangement for bilateral financial contracts in which an assessment of counterparty credit risk is crucial for efficiency. The economy is populated by borrowers and lenders. Borrowers are subject to limited commitment and hold private information about the severity of such lack of commitment. Lenders can acquire information, at a cost, about the commitment of their borrowers, which affects the assessment of counterparty risk. Clearing through a central counterparty allows lenders to mutualize counterparty credit risk, but this insurance may weaken incentives to acquire and reveal information. If information acquisition is incentive-compatible, then lenders choose central clearing. If it is not, they may prefer bilateral clearing either to prevent strategic default or to optimize the allocation of costly collateral.

MSC:

91G40 Credit risk
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Acharya, Viral and AlbertoBisin (2014), “Counterparty risk externality: Centralized versus over‐the‐counter markets.” Journal of Economic Theory, 149, 153-182. · Zbl 1288.91186
[2] Afonso, Gara and RicardoLagos (2012), “An empirical study of trade dynamics in the fed funds market.” FRB of New York Staff Report 550.
[3] Antinolfi, Gaetano, FrancescaCarapella, and FrancescoCarli (2019), “Transparency and collateral: The design of ccps” loss allocation rules.” Discussion Series 2019‐058, Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 10.17016/FEDS.2019.058.
[4] Antinolfi, Gaetano, FrancescaCarapella, CharlesKahn, AntoineMartin, David C.Mills, and EdNosal (2015), “Repos, fire sales, and bankruptcy policy.” Review of Economic Dynamics, 18, 21-31.
[5] Bech, Morten L. and EnghinAtalay (2010), “The topology of the federal funds market.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389, 5223-5246.
[6] Biais, Bruno, FlorianHeider, and MarieHoerova (2016), “Risk‐sharing or risk‐taking? Counterparty risk, incentives, and margins.” The Journal of Finance, 71, 1669-1698.
[7] Bignon, Vincent and GuillaumeVuillemey (2020), “The failure of a clearinghouse: Empirical evidence.” Review of Finance, 24, 99-128.
[8] Cox, Robert T. and Robert S.Steigerwald (2017), “A ccp is a ccp is a ccp.” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, PDP, 1.
[9] Edwards, Franklin R. (1983), “The clearing association in futures markets: Guarantor and regulator.” The Journal of Futures Markets (pre‐1986), 3, 369.
[10] Garbade, Kenneth D. (2006), “The evolution of repo contracting conventions in the 1980s.” New York Fed Economic Policy Review, 12.
[11] Gregory, Jon (2014), Central Counterparties: Mandatory Central Clearing and Initial Margin Requirements for OTC Derivatives. John Wiley & Sons.
[12] Hauswald, Robert and RobertMarquez (2006), “Competition and strategic information acquisition in credit markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 19, 967-1000.
[13] Koeppl, Thorsten, CyrilMonnet, and TedTemzelides (2012), “Optimal clearing arrangements for financial trades.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 189-203.
[14] Koeppl, Thorsten V. (2013), The Limits of Central Counterparty Clearing: Collusive Moral Hazard and Market Liquidity. Technical report, Queen’s Economics Department Working Paper.
[15] Koeppl, Thorsten V. and CyrilMonnet (2010), The Emergence and Future of Central Counterparties. Technical report, Queen’s Economics Department Working Paper.
[16] Krishnamurthy, Arvind, StefanNagel, and DmitryOrlov (2014), “Sizing up repo.” The Journal of Finance, 69, 2381-2417.
[17] Kroszner, Randall S. (1999), “Can the financial markets privately regulate risk?: The development of derivatives clearinghouses and recent over‐the‐counter innovations.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 596-618.
[18] Kroszner, Randall S. (2006), “Central counterparty clearing: History, innovation, and regulation.” In Economic Perspectives, volume 30, Fourth Quarter.
[19] María Liberti, José and Mitchell A.Petersen (2019), “Information: Hard and soft.” Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 8, 1-41.
[20] Mian, Atif (2003), “Foreign, private domestic, and government banks: New evidence from emerging markets.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 1219-1410.
[21] Oleschak, Robert (2019), “Central counterparty auctions and loss allocation.”, SNB working paper 6/2019.
[22] Stein, Jeremy C. (2002), “Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized versus hierarchical firms.” The Journal of Finance, 57, 1891-1921.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.