×

Efficiency of European airports: parametric versus non-parametric approach. (English) Zbl 1480.90156

Summary: This paper presents a performance evaluation of European airports, based on the application of both parametric and non-parametric approaches. We have evaluated the 115 busiest airports in Europe according to the number of passengers checked-in in 2018. The four inputs we used were the number of Terminals, Runways, Boarding gates, and Aircraft stands. Three variables were used to describe the outputs, namely, Passengers, Movements, and Cargo. The parametric method we chose to apply was the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) with the Cobb-Douglas production function, the Half-Normal distribution of inefficiency component, and the Normal distribution of an error term. As a basic SFA model only allows for a single output, we employed different methods to get a single efficiency score for each and every airport. Next, we evaluated the airport performance non-parametrically using several Data Envelope Analysis (DEA) models including the super-efficiency model. We compared the results obtained by individual approaches and discussed their pros and cons. Finally, we applied the program evaluation procedure to explore the effect of the different forms of airports ownership on their performance.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives

Software:

Benchmarking; sfa

References:

[1] ACI EUROPE. (2018). Airport traffic report (December, Q4, H2 & Full Year 2018). Available from:https://www.aci- europe.org/policy/positionpapers.html[Accessed 15-07-19]
[2] Airports Council International (2019). Annual Traffic Data. Available from:https://aci.aero/datacentre/annual-traffic-data/[Accessed 20-04-21]
[3] AIRPORTDATABASE.(2019).Availablefrom:https://airportdatabase.net/europeairports.html. [Accessed 2019-07-15].
[4] Adler, N., and Berechnam, J. (2001). Measuring airport quality from the airlines’ viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis. Transport Policy, 8(3), 171-181.doi: 10.1016/S0967070X(01)00011-7
[5] Barros,C.P. and Dieke,P.U. (2007). Performance evaluation of Italian airports:a data envelopment analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4), 184-191.doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.03.001
[6] Bogetoft P. & Otto L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Springer. · Zbl 1213.90001
[7] Brockett, P.L. and Golany B. (1996). Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 42(3), 466-472.doi: 10.1287/mnsc.42.3.466 · Zbl 0881.90002
[8] Dlouh´y, M., Jablonsk´y, J. and Z´ykov´a, P. (2019). Anal´yza obalu dat. Praha: Professional publishing.
[9] Gillen, D. (2010). The evolution of airport ownership and governance. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(1), 3-13.doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.10.003
[10] Kumbhakar, S. C., Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 0968.62080
[11] Liebert, V. (2011). Airport Benchmarking: An Efficiency Analysis of European Airports from an Economic and Managerial Perspective. Doctoral thesis. Bremen: Jacobs University.https://dnb.info/1035211297/34
[12] Liebert, V. and Niemeier H. M. (2013). A Survey of Empirical Research on the Productivity and Efficiency Measurement of Airports. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 47, 157-189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24396267
[13] Lin, L.C. and Hong, C.H. (2006). Operational performance evaluation of international major airports: an application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 12(6), 342-351.doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2006.08.002
[14] Morrison,W.G.(2009).Understandingthecomplexitiesandchallengesofairportperformancebenchmarking.JournalofAirportManagement,3,145-158.
[15] Oum, T.H., Adler, N. and Yu, C. (2006). Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world’s major airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 12(3), 109-121.doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.11.003
[16] Oum, T.H., Yan, J. and Yu, C. (2008). Ownership forms matter for airport efficiency: A stochastic frontier investigation of worldwide airports. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 422-435.doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.03.001
[17] Parker, D. (1999). The performance of BAA before and after privatisation: A DEA study. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 33(2), 133-145.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20053801
[18] Pels, E., Nijkamp, P., and Rietveld, P. (2001). Relative efficiency of European airports. Transport Policy, 8(3), 183-192.doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00012-9
[19] Pels, E., Nijkamp, P., and Rietveld, P. (2003). Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(5), 341-361.doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(03)00016-4
[20] Scippacercola, S., and Sepe, E. (2014). Principal component analysis to ranking technical efficiencies through stochastic frontier analysis and DEA. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 9(4), 1-9.http://www.jaqm.ro/issues/volume-9,issue-4/1 SCIPPACERCOLA SEPE.php
[21] Sueyoshi, T., and Aoki, S. (2001). A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test. Omega, 29(1), 1-18.doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00024-4
[22] Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509.doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5 · Zbl 0990.90523
[23] Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32-41.doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1 · Zbl 1073.90520
[24] Vogel, H. A. (2006). Impact of privatisation on the financial and economic performance of European airports. Aeronautical Journal, 110(1106), 197-213.doi: 10.1017/S0001924000001184
[25] Xu,K.,Windle,R.,Grimm,C.andCorsi,T.(1994).Re-EvaluatingReturns toScaleinTransport.JournalofTransportEconomicsandPolicy,28(3),275-286. https://www.jstor
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.