×

Anaphors and quantifiers. (English) Zbl 1478.03063

Väänänen, Jouko (ed.) et al., Logic, language, information, and computation. 23rd international workshop, WoLLIC 2016, Puebla, Mexico, August 16–19th, 2016. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9803, 432-445 (2016).
Summary: Various properties of functions denoted by anaphors and anaphoric determiners are studied in this paper. These properties indicate similarities (conservativity, intersectivity) and differences (predicate invariance, anaphoric conservativity, anaphoric intersectivity) between anaphoric functions and quantifiers and show that anaphors essentially extend the expressive power of natural languages.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1343.03002].

MSC:

03B65 Logic of natural languages
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Barwise, J., Cooper, R.: Generalised quantifiers and natural language. Linguist. Philos. 4, 159–219 (1981) · Zbl 0473.03033 · doi:10.1007/BF00350139
[2] Dalrymple, M., et al.: Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguist. Philos. 21, 151–210 (1998) · doi:10.1023/A:1005330227480
[3] Egli, U.: Anaphora from Athens to Amsterdam. In: von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (eds.) Reference and Anaphoric Relations, pp. 17–29. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000) · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_2
[4] van Eijck, J.: Normal forms for characteristic functions. J. Logic Comput. 15(2), 85–98 (2005) · Zbl 1070.03016 · doi:10.1093/logcom/exi003
[5] Geach, P.T.: Reference and Generality. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1968)
[6] Keenan, E.L.: Beyond the Frege boundary. Linguist. Philos. 15, 199–221 (1992) · Zbl 0749.03015 · doi:10.1007/BF00635807
[7] Keenan, E.L.: On the denotations of anaphors. Res. Lang. Comput. 5–1, 5–17 (2007) · doi:10.1007/s11168-006-9014-y
[8] Keenan, E.L., Westerståhl, D.: Generalized quantifiers in linguistics and logic. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 837–893. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997) · doi:10.1016/B978-044481714-3/50020-5
[9] Peters, S., Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
[10] Sabato, S., Winter, Y.: Relational domains and the interpretation of reciprocals. Linguist. Philos. 35, 191–241 (2012) · doi:10.1007/s10988-012-9117-x
[11] Zuber, R.: Generalising conservativity. In: Dawar, A., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLIC 2010. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 6188, pp. 247–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2010a) · Zbl 1253.03057 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13824-9_20
[12] Zuber, R.: Semantic constraints on anaphoric determiners. Res. Lang. Comput. 8, 255–271 (2010b) · doi:10.1007/s11168-011-9076-3
[13] Zuber, R.: Reflexives and non-Fregean quantifiers. In: Graf, T., et al. (eds.) Theories of Everything: in Honor of Ed Keenan, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 17, pp. 439–445 (2012)
[14] Zuber, R.: Generalising predicate and argument invariance. In: Asher, N., Soloviev, S. (eds.) LACL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8535, pp. 163–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) · Zbl 1291.03065 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43742-1_13
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.