×

The nature of scientific philosophy. (English) Zbl 1478.00016

Summary: The goal of this paper is to explain the nature of philosophy as a distinct science with its own subject-matter. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of mathematical and philosophical knowledge that reveals a profound similarity between mathematics and philosophy as mutually complementary sciences exploring the field of abstract entities that can be comprehended only by purely a priori theoretical inquiry. By considering this complementarity, a general definition of philosophy can be obtained by dualizing the traditional Aristotelian definition of mathematics as the “science of quantity”. Philosophy should thus be interpreted as an a priori science of the pure qualitative attributes of being.

MSC:

00A30 Philosophy of mathematics
03A05 Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
03A10 Logic in the philosophy of science
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bailey, D.H., J.M. Borwein, N.J. Calkin, R. Girgensohn, D.R. Luke and V.H. Moll, Experimental Mathematics in Action, Wellesley, MA: A K Peters, 2007. DOI: · Zbl 1127.00002
[2] Blackburn, S., The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2016. DOI:
[3] Bourbaki, N. L’Architecture des mathematiques. Les grands courants de la pensée mathématique, Marseille: Cahiers du Sud, 1948
[4] Elliott-Graves, A., and M. Weisberg, “Idealization”, Philosophy Compass 9, 3 (2014): 176-185. DOI:
[5] Franklin, J., “Aristotelian realism”, pages 103-155 in A. Irvine (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science series, North-Holland Elsevier, 2009. DOI: · Zbl 1185.00008
[6] Friedland, J., “Philosophy is not a science”, The New York Times, April 5, 2012:
[7] Frege, G. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number, New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960 · Zbl 0123.24604
[8] Hegel, G.W.F., Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline, Part I: Science of Logic, edited and translated by K. Brinkmann and D.O. Dahlstrom, Cambridge University Press, 2015.edited and translated by K. Brinkmann and D.O. Dahlstrom, Cambridge University Press, 2015
[9] Hempel, C., “On the nature of mathematical truth”, pages 378-393 in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Readings, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. DOI:
[10] Husserl, E., Logical Investigations, vol. I, London and New York: Routledge, 2001 · Zbl 1073.01026
[11] Jenkins, C., “A priori knowledge: debates and developments”, Philosophy Compass 3, 3 (2008): 436-450. DOI:
[12] Johnson, R., Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. DOI:
[13] Kant, I. Lectures on Logic, translated and edited by J. Michael Young, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992
[14] Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by P. Guyer and Al.W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
[15] Knobe, J., and S. Nichols, “Experimental philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2017 Edition, E.N. Zaltaã(ed.)
[16] Kraft, V., Der Wiener Kreis: Der Ursprung des Neopositivismus. Ein Kapitel der jüngsten Philosophiegeschichte, Wien-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1968
[17] Montague, R., “On the nature of certain philosophical entities”, Monist 53, 2 (1969): 159-194. DOI:
[18] Natorp, P., Philosophische Propädeutik: Allgemeine Einleitung in die Philosophie und Anfangsgründe der Logik, Ethik und Psychologie, Marburg: N.G. Elwert, 1905
[19] Peirce, C.S., “An outline classification of the sciences”, pages 203-283 in The Collected Papers, vol. 1, 1902
[20] Penguin English Dictionary, 3rd edition, Penguin, 2007
[21] Priest, G., “What is philosophy?”, Philosophy 81 (2006): 189-207. DOI:
[22] Restall, G., “A priori truths”, pages 37-50 in J. Shand (ed.), Central Issues of Philosophy, Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. DOI:
[23] Schopenhauer, A., On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and On the Will in Nature: Two Essays, revised edition, London: George Bell and Sons, 1907
[24] Schlick, M., “The turning point in philosophy”, pages 53-59 in A.J. Ayer, Logical Positivism, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1959
[25] Shramko, Y., “The logical way of being true: truth values and the ontological foundation of logic”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 23, 2 (2014): 119-131. DOI: · Zbl 1321.03021
[26] Spinoza, B., The Complete Works, edited, with introductions, by M.L. Morgan, translated by S. Shirley, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2002
[27] Williamson, T., The Philosophy of Philosophy, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell,
[28] DOI:
[29] Windelband, W., “Was ist Philosophie?”, in Präludien, Tübingen: Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1907
[30] Wolff, Ch., Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 2006
[31] Wundt,
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.