Counterfactual reasoning, realism and quantum mechanics: much ado about nothing? (English) Zbl 1474.81002
Summary: I show why old and new claims on the role of counterfactual reasoning for the EPR argument and Bell’s theorem are unjustified: once the logical relation between locality and counterfactual reasoning is clarified, the use of the latter does no harm and the nonlocality result can well follow from the EPR premises. To show why, after emphasizing the role of incompleteness arguments that Einstein developed before the EPR paper, I critically review more recent claims that equate the use of counterfactual reasoning with the assumption of a strong form of realism and argue that such claims are untenable.
MSC:
| 81P05 | General and philosophical questions in quantum theory |
References:
| [1] | Bacciagaluppi, G., & Valentini, A. (Eds.). (2009). Quantum theory at the crossroad. Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 1443.81002 |
| [2] | Bell, J. S. (1975). The theory of local beables, CERN publication TH-2053-CERN (reprinted in Bell 2004, pp. 52-62). |
| [3] | Bell, J. S. (2004). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 1239.81002 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815676 |
| [4] | Bertlmann, R. A., & Zeilinger, A. (Eds.). (2002). Quantum (un)speakables. From Bell to quantum information. Berlin: Springer. · Zbl 1087.81007 |
| [5] | Blaylock, G. (2010). The EPR paradox, Bell’s inequality, and the question of locality. American Journal of Physics,78, 111-120. · doi:10.1119/1.3243279 |
| [6] | Born, M. (2005). The Born-Einstein letters 1916-1955. New York: McMillan. |
| [7] | Boughn, S. (2017). Making sense of Bell’s theorem and quantum nonlocality. Foundations of Physics,47, 640-657. · Zbl 1370.81005 · doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0083-6 |
| [8] | Butterfield, J., Clifton, R., & Redhead, M. L. G. (1990). Nonlocal influences and possible worlds—A Stapp in the wrong direction. British Journal for Philosophy of Science,41, 5-58. · doi:10.1093/bjps/41.1.5 |
| [9] | Eberhard, P. H. (1977). Bell’s theorem without hidden variables. Il Nuovo Cimento,38B, 75-80. · doi:10.1007/BF02726212 |
| [10] | Eberhard, P. H. (1978). Bell’s theorem and different concepts of locality. Il Nuovo Cimento,46B, 392-419. · Zbl 0978.81500 · doi:10.1007/BF02728628 |
| [11] | Einstein, A.; Schilpp, PA (ed.), Autobiographical notes (1949), New York |
| [12] | Fine, A. (1982). Hidden variables, joint probability and the Bell inequalities. Physical Review Letters,48, 291-295. · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.291 |
| [13] | Fine, A. (1986). The Shaky Game. Einstein realism and the quantum theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| [14] | Gell-Mann, M., & Hartle, J. (1989). Quantum mechanics in light of quantum cosmology. In Proceedings of the third international symposium on the foundations of quantum mechanics, Tokyo (pp. 321-343). |
| [15] | Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Tausk, D., & Zanghì, N. (2011). Bell’s theorem. Scholarpedia,6(10), 8378. · doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.8378 |
| [16] | Griffiths, R. B. (2011). EPR, Bell and quantum locality. American Journal of Physics,79, 954-965. · doi:10.1119/1.3606371 |
| [17] | Hardy, L. (1995). The EPR argument and nonlocality without inequalities for a single photon. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 755, 600-615. · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb39000.x |
| [18] | Home, D., & Whitaker, A. (2007). Einstein’s struggles with quantum theory. Berlin: Springer. · Zbl 1167.81003 |
| [19] | Howard, D. (1993). Was Einstein really a realist? Perspectives on Science,1, 204-251. · Zbl 1292.01032 |
| [20] | Kraus, K. (1989). Quantum theory does not require action at a distance. Foundations of Physics Letters,2, 1-6. · doi:10.1007/BF00690072 |
| [21] | Laudisa, F. (1996). Nonlocality: A defense of widespread beliefs. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,27, 297-313. · Zbl 1222.81098 · doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(96)00009-3 |
| [22] | Maccone, L. (2013). Simplest proof of Bell’s inequality. American Journal of Physics,81, 854-859. · doi:10.1119/1.4823600 |
| [23] | Maudlin, T. (2011). How Bell reasoned: A reply to Griffiths. American Journal of Physics,79, 966-970. · doi:10.1119/1.3606476 |
| [24] | Maudlin, T. (2014). What Bell did. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical,47, 424010. · Zbl 1302.81020 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424010 |
| [25] | Mermin, N. D. (1992). Not quite no simply no hidden variables. American Journal of Physics,60, 25-27. · Zbl 1219.81023 · doi:10.1119/1.17037 |
| [26] | Norsen, T. (2005). Einstein’s boxes. American Journal of Physics,73, 164-176. · doi:10.1119/1.1811620 |
| [27] | Peres, A. (1978). Unperformed measurements have no result. American Journal of Physics,46, 745-747. · doi:10.1119/1.11393 |
| [28] | Shimony, A. (1984). Contextual hidden variable theories and Bell’s inequalities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35, 25-45 (reprinted in Search for a Naturalistic World View. Vol. II Natural Science and Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 104-129, reference to the reprinted edition). · Zbl 0572.03006 |
| [29] | Stapp, H. P. (1985a). Bell’s theorem and the foundations of physics. American Journal of Physics,53, 306-317. · doi:10.1119/1.14156 |
| [30] | Stapp, HP; Lahti, P. (ed.); Mittelstaedt, P. (ed.), EPR: What has it taught us?, 637-652 (1985), Singapore |
| [31] | Unruh, W. G. (1999). Nonlocality, counterfactuals, and quantum mechanics. Physical Review A,59, 126-130. · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.59.126 |
| [32] | Unruh, WG; Placek, T. (ed.); Butterfield, J. (ed.), Is quantum mechanics non-local?, 125-136 (2001), Dordrecht |
| [33] | Whitaker, A. (2016). Richard Feynman and Bell’s theorem. American Journal of Physics,84, 493-494. · doi:10.1119/1.4948268 |
| [34] | Wolf, S. (2015). Nonlocality without counterfactual signalling. Physical Review A,92, 052102. · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052102 |
| [35] | Zukovski, M., & Brukner, C. (2014). Quantum nonlocality—It ain’t necessarily so…. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical,47, 424009. · Zbl 1302.81010 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424009 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
