×

Functorial semiotics for creativity. (English) Zbl 1466.00017

Summary: In this paper, we develop a mathematically conceived semiotic theory. This project seems essential for a future computational creativity science since the outcome of the process of creativity must add new signs to given semiotic contexts. The mathematical framework is built upon categories of functors, in particular linearized categories deduced from path categories of digraphs and the Gabriel-Zisman calculus of fractions. Semantics in this approach is extended to a number of “global” constructions enabled by the Yoneda Lemma, including cohomological constructions. This approach concludes with a short discussion of classes of creativity with respect to the proposed functorial semiotics.

MSC:

00A65 Mathematics and music
16E30 Homological functors on modules (Tor, Ext, etc.) in associative algebras
18A25 Functor categories, comma categories
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Dahlhaus, Carl. 1961. “Zur Theorie des klassischen Kontrapunkts.” Kirchenmusikalisches Jahrbuch 45: 43-57.
[2] Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280(4): 20-32. · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x
[3] Finsler, Paul. 1926. “Über die Grundlegung der Mengenlehre. Erster Teil. Die Mengen und ihre Axiome.” Mathematische Zeitschrift 25: 673-713. · JFM 52.0192.01 · doi:10.1007/BF01283862
[4] Gabriel, Peter, and Michel Zisman. 1967. Calculus of Fractions and Homotopy Theory. Heidelberg: Springer. · Zbl 0186.56802 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85844-4
[5] Goguen, Joseph. 1999. “An Introduction to Algebraic Semiotics, with Application to User Interface Design.” In Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1562, edited by C. L. Nehaniv (Heidelberg: Springer): 242-291.
[6] Hjelmslev, Louis. 1968-71. Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. Paris: Minuit.
[7] Kühnberger, Kai-Uwe, Emilia Cambouropoulos, and Oliver Kutz (convenors). 2016. “From Computational Creativity to Creativity Science.” Conference, September 19-22, Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielefeld. · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
[8] Ligeti, György. 1958. “Pierre Boulez: Entscheidung und Automatik in der Structure Ia.” Die Reihe 4: 38-63.
[9] Mac Lane, Saunders, and Ieke Moerdijk. 1992. Sheaves in Geometry and Logic. Heidelberg: Springer. · Zbl 0822.18001 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0927-0
[10] Mazzola, Guerino. 1998. “Semiotic Aspects of Musicology: Semiotics of Music.” In A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture, edited by R. Posner et al., 3103-3188. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
[11] Mazzola, Guerino. 2002. The Topos of Music. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag. · Zbl 1104.00003 · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8141-8
[12] Mazzola, Guerino. 2009. “Categorical Gestures, the Diamond Conjecture, Lewin”s Question, and the Hammerklavier Sonata.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 3 (1): 31-58. doi: 10.1080/17459730902910480 · Zbl 1180.00014
[13] Mazzola, Guerino, Joomi Park and Florian Thalmann. 2011. Musical Creativity. Heidelberg: Springer. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24517-6
[14] Mazzola, Guerino, Maria Mannone, Yan Pang, Margaret O’Brien, and Nathan Torunsky. 2016. All About Music. Heidelberg: Springer. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47334-5
[15] Medushevsky, Viatscheslav. 1995. “Musical intonation — Language of Intuition and Longic: A Contribution to the System of Semiotics of Intonation of Music.” In Musical Signification, Essays in the Semiotic Theory and Analysis of Music, edited by Eero Tarasti, 189-198. Berlin: W de Gruyter. · doi:10.1515/9783110885187.189
[16] de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1922. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
[17] Tomasello, Michael. 1996. “Why Don”t Apes Point?” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson, 506-524. Oxford: Berg. · doi:10.4324/9781003135517-25
[18] Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, and Ulf Liszkowski. 2007. “A New Look at Infant Pointing.” Child Development 78 (3): 705-722. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.