×

A reinforced randomized block design with correlated errors. (English) Zbl 1462.62494

Summary: In the analysis of variance the errors are assumed to be independent which may not always be true. In this article, a restricted randomized block design under compound autocorrelated structure is considered. A method of analysis for such a randomized block design has been developed. It provides confidence ellipsoid and confidence interval of a set of estimable functions and an estimable function of treatment parameters, respectively. Analogous to Scheffe’s method, the multiple comparison technique of judging all possible treatment contrasts has been derived. In the process, a method of estimation of unknown parameters has been also developed. An example (simulated data) illustrates this approach.

MSC:

62K20 Response surface designs
05B30 Other designs, configurations
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/61.3.427 · Zbl 0301.62044 · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.427
[2] Chatterjee S., Regression Analysis by Examples., 3. ed. (2000)
[3] DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(93)90115-M · Zbl 0809.62068 · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(93)90115-M
[4] Das M. N., J. Ind. Soc. Agric. Statist. 10 pp 73– (1958)
[5] Das R. N., J. Statist. Theor. Applic. 7 pp 245– (2008)
[6] Federer W. T., Hawaiian Planters’ Rec. 55 pp 191– (1956)
[7] DOI: 10.2307/2527837 · Zbl 0101.36301 · doi:10.2307/2527837
[8] Finney D. J., An Introduction to the Theory of Experimental Design (1960) · Zbl 0104.37202
[9] DOI: 10.1080/03610928508829037 · doi:10.1080/03610928508829037
[10] Goon A. M., Fundamental of Statistics 2 (2002)
[11] DOI: 10.2307/2533558 · Zbl 0890.62042 · doi:10.2307/2533558
[12] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176345515 · Zbl 0546.62051 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345515
[13] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176346498 · Zbl 0558.62066 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346498
[14] Kmenta J., Elements of Econometrics (1971) · Zbl 0272.62001
[15] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/72.2.375 · Zbl 0577.62066 · doi:10.1093/biomet/72.2.375
[16] Kunert J., Optimal Design and Analysis of Experiments pp 115– (1988)
[17] DOI: 10.1201/9781420011340 · Zbl 1110.62092 · doi:10.1201/9781420011340
[18] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/69.3.597 · Zbl 0497.62067 · doi:10.1093/biomet/69.3.597
[19] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/73.2.247 · Zbl 0607.62093 · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.2.247
[20] Martin R. J., Hand book of Statistics (1996)
[21] DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(93)90069-I · Zbl 0770.62059 · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(93)90069-I
[22] Mead R., The Design of Experiments (1994)
[23] DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(90)90015-M · Zbl 0686.62054 · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(90)90015-M
[24] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176348391 · Zbl 0764.62060 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176348391
[25] Morgan J. P., Statistics 30 pp 1– (1998)
[26] Mukherjee , B. N. ( 1981 ). A simple approach to testing of hypotheses regarding a class of covariance structures.Ind. Statist. Instit. Golden Jubilee Inter. Conf. Statist. Applic. New direct.Kolkata, December 16–19, pp. 442–465 .
[27] DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1965.0012 · Zbl 0124.10703 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1965.0012
[28] DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1965.0013 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1965.0013
[29] Pawitan Y., In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference using Likelihood (2001) · Zbl 1013.62001
[30] Pearce S. C., Biometrika. 47 pp 263– (1960) · Zbl 0104.37203 · doi:10.1093/biomet/47.3-4.263
[31] Rao C. R., Sankhya Ser. A 33 pp 371– (1971)
[32] DOI: 10.1002/9780470316436 · Zbl 0256.62002 · doi:10.1002/9780470316436
[33] DOI: 10.2307/2528428 · doi:10.2307/2528428
[34] DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177729029 · Zbl 0051.36701 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729029
[35] DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177728912 · Zbl 0052.15403 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728912
[36] DOI: 10.1080/03610920601076925 · Zbl 1315.62066 · doi:10.1080/03610920601076925
[37] Scheffe H., Biometrika 40 pp 87– (1953)
[38] Scheffe H., The Analysis of Variance (1959) · Zbl 0072.36602
[39] Tukey , J. W. (1952). Allowances of various types of errors rates.Blacksburg Mtg. of the Instit. Mathemat. Statist.March, unpublished.
[40] Uddin N., J. Statist. Res. 31 pp 75– (1997)
[41] DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00139-1 · Zbl 0960.62075 · doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00139-1
[42] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1069362744 · Zbl 0876.62061 · doi:10.1214/aos/1069362744
[43] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/84.2.443 · Zbl 0882.62073 · doi:10.1093/biomet/84.2.443
[44] Yates F., Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probab 4 pp 777– (1965)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.