×

The role of classification trees and expert knowledge in building Bayesian networks: a case study in medicine. (English) Zbl 1462.62064

Summary: In clinical research an early and prompt detection of the risk class of a new patient may really play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of the treatment and, consequently, achieving a satisfying prognosis of the patient’s chances. There exists a number of popular rule-based algorithms for classification, whose performances are very attractive whenever data of large number of patients are available. However, when datasets only include data of a few hundred patients, the most common approaches give unstable results and developing effective decision-support systems become scientifically challenging. Since rules can be derived from different models as well as expert knowledge resources, each of them having its advantages and weaknesses, this article suggests a “hybrid” approach to address the classification problem when the number of patients is too small to effectively use a single technique only. The hybrid strategy was applied to a case study and its predictive performance was compared with performances of each single approach: due to the seriousness of a misclassification of high-risk patients, special attention was paid on the specificity. The results show that the hybrid strategy outperforms each single strategy involved.

MSC:

62C12 Empirical decision procedures; empirical Bayes procedures
62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aliferis C., In Proceedings of Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence pp 8– (1994)
[2] Breiman L., Classification and Regression Trees (1984) · Zbl 0541.62042
[3] Cooper G., Mach. Learn. 9 pp 309– (1992)
[4] DOI: 10.1023/A:1007413511361 · Zbl 0892.68076 · doi:10.1023/A:1007413511361
[5] Friedman J., Stochastic gradient boosting. Technical report (1999) · Zbl 1072.65502
[6] DOI: 10.1023/A:1007465528199 · Zbl 0892.68077 · doi:10.1023/A:1007465528199
[7] DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Zbl 1273.62005 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
[8] Heckerman D. Geiger, Mach. Learn. 20 pp 197– (1995)
[9] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.022 · Zbl 1137.90547 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.022
[10] Lucas P., Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2101 pp 156– (2001)
[11] Mazid M. M., WSEAS Trans. Inform. Sci. Applic. 7 (6) pp 749– (2010)
[12] Neapolitan R. E., Learning Bayesian Networks (2003)
[13] Pearl J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (1988) · Zbl 0746.68089
[14] Rissanen J., J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 49 pp 223– (1987)
[15] Xindong W., The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining (2009) · Zbl 1179.68129
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.