×

Blow-up in a parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system with density-dependent sublinear sensitivity and logistic source. (English) Zbl 1452.35049

This paper considers the parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system with density-dependent sublinear sensitivity and logistic source: \[ \begin{cases} u_{t}=\Delta u- \chi \nabla \cdot (u(u+1)^{\alpha-1} \nabla v)+ \lambda u- \mu u^{\kappa}, & x\in \Omega,\, t>0, \\ 0= \Delta v-v +u, & x\in \Omega,\, t>0, \end{cases} \] where \(\Omega:= B_{R}(0)\subset \mathbb{R}^{n}\) \((n\geq 3)\) is a ball with some \(R>0\) and \(\chi>0\), \(0<\alpha<1\), \(\lambda\in R\), \(\mu>0\) and \(\kappa>1\).
The main contribution of this paper is to find conditions for \(\alpha\) and \(\kappa\) such that there exist solutions that blow up in finite time in the case of weak-chemotactic sensitivity, that is, in the case \(0<\alpha<1\). The authors extend the results of M. Winkler [Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 69, No. 2, Paper No. 40, 25 p. (2018; Zbl 1395.35048)] in which discovered the conditions for \(\alpha=1\) and \(\kappa>1\). In the proof of the main results, the authors establish a key differential inequality (see Lemma 4.12).
The proof of the theorem is delicate and seem to be right. This is a great work. The paper is well organized with a complete list of relevant references. The presentation of the paper is very clear. No typos was detected. I think it is a good paper. However, the case is unknown whether the parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system with some same conditions appears blow up or not. This will arouse more interest to relevant researchers to study the above system extensively.

MSC:

35B44 Blow-up in context of PDEs
35K65 Degenerate parabolic equations
92C17 Cell movement (chemotaxis, etc.)

Citations:

Zbl 1395.35048
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] KellerEF, SegelLA. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theoret Biol. 1970;26:399‐415. · Zbl 1170.92306
[2] CaoX. Global bounded solutions of the higher‐dimensional Keller-Segel system under smallness conditions in optimal spaces. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2015;35:1891‐1904. · Zbl 1515.35047
[3] OsakiK, YagiA. Finite dimensional attractor for one‐dimensional Keller-Segel equations. Funkcial Ekvac. 2001;44:441‐469. · Zbl 1145.37337
[4] WinklerM. Aggregation vs. global diffusive behavior in the higher‐dimensional Keller-Segel model. J Differential Equations. 2010;248:2889‐2905. · Zbl 1190.92004
[5] WinklerM. Finite‐time blow‐up in the higher‐dimensional parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system. J. Math. Pures Appl.2013;100(9):748‐767. · Zbl 1326.35053
[6] HorstmannD, WangG. Blow‐up in a chemotaxis model without symmetry assumptions. European J Appl Math. 2001;12:159‐177. · Zbl 1017.92006
[7] HillenT, PainterKJ. A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis. J Math Biol. 2009;58:183‐217. · Zbl 1161.92003
[8] ViglialoroG. Private discussion about blow‐up in a chemotaxis system suggested by Michael Winkler; 2019.
[9] WinklerM. Boundedness in the higher‐dimensional parabolic-parabolic chemotaxis system with logistic source. Comm Partial Differential Equations. 2010;35:1516‐1537. · Zbl 1290.35139
[10] TaoY, WinklerM. Boundedness in a quasilinear parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system with subcritical sensitivity. J Differential Equations. 2012;252:692‐715. · Zbl 1382.35127
[11] JinH, XiangT. Chemotaxis effect vs. logistic damping on boundedness in the 2‐D minimal Keller-Segel model. C R Math Acad Sci Paris. 2018;356:875‐885. · Zbl 1397.92096
[12] ZhengJ. Boundedness of solutions to a quasilinear parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system with logistic source. J Differential Equations. 2015;259:120‐140. · Zbl 1331.92026
[13] ZhengJ. A note on boundedness of solutions to a higher‐dimensional quasi‐linear chemotaxis system with logistic source. ZAMM Z Angew Math Mech. 2017;97:414‐421. · Zbl 1529.92008
[14] CaoX. Boundedness in a quasilinear parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system with logistic source. J Math Anal Appl. 2014;412:181‐188. · Zbl 1364.35123
[15] WinklerM. Finite‐time blow‐up in low‐dimensional Keller-Segel systems with logistic‐type superlinear degradation. Z Angew Math Phys. 2018;69:40. · Zbl 1395.35048
[16] IshidaS, SekiK, YokotaT. Boundedness in quasilinear Keller-Segel systems of parabolic-parabolic type on non‐convex bounded domains. J Differential Equations. 2014;256:2993‐3010. · Zbl 1295.35252
[17] CieślakT, StinnerC. Finite‐time blowup and global‐in‐time unbounded solutions to a parabolic-parabolic quasilinear Keller-Segel system in higher dimensions. J Differential Equations. 2012;252:5832‐5851. · Zbl 1252.35087
[18] CieślakT, StinnerC. New critical exponents in a fully parabolic quasilinear Keller-Segel system and applications to volume filling modes. J Differential Equations. 2015;258:2080‐2113. · Zbl 1331.35041
[19] WinklerM. Global classical solvability and generic infinite‐time blow‐up in quasilinear Keller-Segel systems with bounded sensitivities. J Differential Equations. 2019;266:8034‐8066. · Zbl 1415.35052
[20] NishinoT, YokotaT. Effect of nonlinear diffusion on a lower bound for the blow‐up time in a fully parabolic chemotaxis system. J Math Anal Appl. 2019;479:1078‐1098. · Zbl 1429.35037
[21] LankeitJ. Infinite time blow‐up of many solutions to a general quasilinear parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser S. 2020;13:233‐255. · Zbl 1439.92042
[22] WinklerM, DjieKC. Boundedness and finite‐time collapse in a chemotaxis system with volume‐filling effect. Nonlinear Anal. 2010;72:1044‐1064. · Zbl 1183.92012
[23] MarrasM, NishinoT, ViglialoroG. A refined criterion and lower bounds for the blow‐up time in a parabolic-elliptic chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion. Nonlinear Anal. 2020;195:111725. · Zbl 1437.35674
[24] HashiraT, IshidaS, YokotaT. Finite‐time blow‐up for quasilinear degenerate Keller-Segel systems of parabolic-parabolic type. J Differential Equations. 2018;264:6459‐6485. · Zbl 1394.35253
[25] TelloJI, WinklerM. A chemotaxis system with logistic source. Comm Partial Differential Equations. 2007;32:849‐877. · Zbl 1121.37068
[26] WinklerM. Blow‐up in a higher‐dimensional chemotaxis system despite logistic growth restriction. J Math Anal Appl. 2011;384:261‐272. · Zbl 1241.35028
[27] ZhengP, MuC, HuX. Boundedness and blow‐up for a chemotaxis system with generalized volume‐filling effect and logistic source. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2015;35:2299‐2323. · Zbl 1307.35067
[28] MarrasM, Vernier PiroS, ViglialoroG. Blow‐up phenomena in chemotaxis systems with a source term. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2016;39:2787‐2798. · Zbl 1342.35137
[29] MarrasM, Vernier PiroS, ViglialoroG. Lower bounds for blow‐up in a parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2015;Dynamical systems, differential equations and applications. 10th AIMS Conference. Suppl.:809‐816. · Zbl 1381.35194
[30] CieślakT, WinklerM. Finite‐time blow‐up in a quasilinear system of chemotaxis. Nonlinearity. 2008;21:1057‐1076. · Zbl 1136.92006
[31] NagaiT. Blow‐up of radially symmetric solutions to a chemotaxis system. Adv Math Sci Appl. 1995;5:581‐601. · Zbl 0843.92007
[32] JägerW, LuckhausS. On explosions of solutions to a system of partial differential equations modelling chemotaxis. Trans Amer Math Soc. 1992;329:819‐824. · Zbl 0746.35002
[33] WinklerM. How unstable is spatial homogeneity in Keller-Segel systems? A new critical mass phenomenon in two‐ and higher‐dimensional parabolic-elliptic cases. Math Ann. 2019;373:1237‐1282. · Zbl 1416.35049
[34] FuestM. Finite‐time blow‐up in a two‐dimensional Keller-Segel system with an environmental dependent logistic source. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2020;52:103022. · Zbl 1471.92060
[35] WinklerM. A critical blow‐up exponent in a chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production. Nonlinearity. 2018;31:2031‐2056. · Zbl 1391.35240
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.