×

Husserl and Peirce and the goals of mathematics. (English) Zbl 1451.03005

Shafiei, Mohammad (ed.) et al., Peirce and Husserl: mutual insights on logic, mathematics and cognition. Cham: Springer. Log. Epistemol. Unity Sci. 46, 125-137 (2019).
Summary: The paper compares the views of Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) and Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) on mathematics around the turn of the century. The two share a view that mathematics is an independent and theoretical discipline. Both think that it is something unrelated to how we actually think, and hence independent of psychology. For both, mathematics reveals the objective and formal structure of the world, and both think that modern mathematics is a Platonist enterprise. Husserl and Peirce also share a teleological conception of the development of mathematics: both view it to evolve towards a goal. This is where the primary difference between the two can be found: while for Husserl the goal of mathematics is to characterize definite manifolds, for Peirce it is to discover the real potential world as expressed by his conception of continuum. Peirce elaborates the continuum with the notion ‘potential aggregate,’ a totality of the series of uncountable sets (each created by Cantor’s theorem) briefly discussed and compared to Husserl’s notion of definite manifolds.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1429.03007].

MSC:

03-03 History of mathematical logic and foundations
03A05 Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
01A55 History of mathematics in the 19th century
01A60 History of mathematics in the 20th century
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Becker, O. (1970). [1930] The philosophy of Edmund Husserl. In R. O. Elveton (ed. and transl.) (pp. 40-72). The phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
[2] Dauben, J. W. (1977). C. S. Peirce’s philosophy of infinite sets. Mathematics Magazine 50(3), 123-135. · Zbl 0361.01010 · doi:10.1080/0025570X.1977.11976631
[3] Dauben, J. W. (1982). Peirce’s place in mathematics. Historia Mathematica,9, 311-325. · Zbl 0489.01028 · doi:10.1016/0315-0860(82)90125-2
[4] Haaparanta, L. (1994). Charles Peirce and the drawings of the mind. Actualité de Peirce. Histoire, Epistemologie, Langage, 16(1), 35-52. · doi:10.3406/hel.1994.2384
[5] Haaparanta, Leila. (2002). On Peirce’s methodology of logic and philosophy. Revista de Filosofia,3, 32-45.
[6] Hartimo, M. (2012). Husserl and algebra of logic. Axiomathes,22(1), 121-133. · Zbl 1302.03004 · doi:10.1007/s10516-011-9166-8
[7] Hartimo, M. (2018). Husserl on completeness, definitely. Synthese 195: 1509-1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1278-7. · Zbl 1398.03020 · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1278-7
[8] Hookway, C. (1992). [1985]. Peirce. London and New York: Routledge.
[9] Husserl, E. (1950). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Husserliana Band III. Herausgegeben von Walter Biemel. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. English translation: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First book. General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. The Hague, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff. 1983.
[10] Husserl, E. (1974). Formale and transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Husserliana Band 17. Edited by Paul Janssen. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974. English translation: Formal and Transcendental Logic, transl. by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague 1969.
[11] Husserl, E. (1975). Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band. Prolegomena zur Reinen Logik. Husserliana Band XVIII. Herausgegeben von Elmar Holenstein. Den Haag. Martinus Nijhoff. English translation: Logical Investigations. Prolegomena to pure logic, transl. by J. N. Findlay. London and New York: Routledge [1970], 2001, 1-161.
[12] Husserl, E. (1994). Briefwechsel. Band I, Die Brentanoschule. Herausgegeben von Karl Schuhmann. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[13] Husserl, E. (2002). Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913). Herausgegeben von Ullrich Melle. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[14] Laine K. K. & Hilary P. (1992). Introduction: The consequences of mathematics. In Peirce 1992, pp. 1-54.
[15] Moore, Matthew E. (2015). Peirce’s topical theory of continuity. Synthese,192, 1055-1071. · Zbl 1357.03008 · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0337-6
[16] Peirce, C. S. (1976). The new elements of mathematics. Edited by Carolyn Eisele, 4 volumes in 5 books. The Hague: Mouton. · Zbl 0443.01024
[17] Peirce, C. S. (1992). Reasoning and the logic of things. The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898. Edited by Kenneth Laine Ketner. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press.
[18] Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce (Vol. 2, pp. 1893-1913). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. · Zbl 0931.01035
[19] Potter, V. G. & Paul B. S. (1977). Peirce’s definitions of continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 13(1), 20-34.
[20] Putnam, H. (1992). Comments on the lectures. Peirce,1992, 55-102.
[21] Schuhmann, K.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.