×

A stochastic economic growth model with health capital and state-dependent probabilities. (English) Zbl 1448.91174

Summary: We analyze a simple stochastic model of economic growth in which physical and health capital accumulation jointly contribute to determine long run economic growth. Health capital is subject to random shocks via the effects of behavioral changes: unpredictable changes in individuals’ attitude toward healthy behaviors may reduce the effectiveness of health services provision; this in turn, by reducing the production of new health capital, lowers economic production activities negatively affecting economic growth. Unlike the extant literature, we assume that the probability with which such random shocks occur is not constant but state-dependent. Specifically, the probability that behavioral changes will negatively impact on health capital and economic growth depends on the level of economic development, proxied by the relative abundance of health capital with respect to physical capital. We show that our model’s dynamics can be converted into an iterated function system with state-dependent probabilities which converges to an invariant self-similar measure supported on a (possibly fractal) compact attractor. We develop a numerical method to approximate the invariant distribution to illustrate its features in specific model’s parametrizations, exemplifying thus the effects of state-dependent probabilities on the model’s steady state.

MSC:

91B62 Economic growth models
39A60 Applications of difference equations
37N40 Dynamical systems in optimization and economics

References:

[1] Article 1
[2] Barnsley, M. F., Fractals everywhere (1989), Academic Press: Academic Press New York
[3] Erratum 1990;25:589-590 · Zbl 0653.60057
[4] Barro, R. J., Health and economic growth, Ann Econ Finance, 14, 329-366 (2013)
[5] Barro, R. J.; Sala-i Martin, X., Economic growth. 2nd Edition (2004), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge
[6] Article 15
[7] Brock, W. A.; Mirman, L. J., Optimal economic growth and uncertainty: the discounted case, J Econ Theory, 4, 479-513 (1972)
[8] Hutchinson, J., Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana Univ J Math, 30, 713-747 (1981) · Zbl 0598.28011
[9] Elton, J., An ergodic theorem for iterated maps, J Erg Theory Dyn Sys, 7, 481-488 (1987) · Zbl 0621.60039
[10] Krugman, P., Increasing returns and economic geography, J Polit Economy, 99, 483-499 (1991)
[11] Kunze, H.; La Torre, D.; Mendivil, F.; Vrscay, E. R., Fractal-based methods in analysis (2012), Springer: Springer New York · Zbl 1237.28002
[12] La Torre, D.; Marsiglio, S.; Privileggi, F., Fractals and self-similarity in economics: the case of a two-sector growth model, Image Anal Stereol, 30, 143-151 (2011) · Zbl 1236.91103
[13] La Torre, D.; Marsiglio, S.; Mendivil, F.; Privileggi, F., Self-similar measures in multi-sector endogenous growth models, Chaos Soliton Fract, 79, 40-56 (2015) · Zbl 1354.91100
[14] La Torre, D.; Maki, E.; Mendivil, F.; Vrscay, E., Iterated function systems with place-dependent probabilities and the inverse problem of measure approximation using moments, Fractals, 26, 1850076 (2018) · Zbl 1433.37021
[15] La Torre, D.; Marsiglio, S.; Privileggi, F., Fractal attractors in economic growth models with random pollution externalities, Chaos, 28, 055916 (2018) · Zbl 1394.91288
[16] La Torre, D.; Marsiglio, S.; Mendivil, F.; Privileggi, F., Fractal attractors and singular invariant measures in two-sector growth models with random factor shares, Comm Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat, 58, 185-201 (2018) · Zbl 1510.91108
[17] Marsiglio, S., Stochastic shocks in a two-sector Solow model, Int J Math ModellNumer Optim, 3, 313-318 (2012) · Zbl 1254.93105
[18] Martin, R.; Sunley, P., Path dependence and regional economic evolution, J Econ Geograph, 6, 395-437 (2006)
[19] Mitra, T.; Montrucchio, L.; Privileggi, F., The nature of the steady state in models of optimal growth under uncertainty, Econ Theory, 23, 39-71 (2003) · Zbl 1175.91107
[20] Mitra, T.; Privileggi, F., Cantor type invariant distributions in the theory of optimal growth under uncertainty, J Differ Equ Appl, 10, 489-500 (2004) · Zbl 1078.91014
[21] Mitra, T.; Privileggi, F., Cantor type attractors in stochastic growth models, Chaos Soliton Fract, 29, 626-637 (2006) · Zbl 1142.91674
[22] Mitra, T.; Privileggi, F., On lipschitz continuity of the iterated function system in a stochastic optimal growth model, J Math Econ, 45, 185-198 (2009) · Zbl 1153.91658
[23] Montrucchio, L.; Privileggi, F., Fractal steady states in stochastic optimal control models, Ann Oper Res, 88, 183-197 (1999) · Zbl 0939.93042
[24] Mullingan, C. B.; Sala-i Martin, X., Transitional dynamics in two-sector models of endogenous growth, Q J Econ, 108, 739-773 (1993)
[25] North, D., Economic performance through time, Am Econ Rev, 84, 359-368 (1994)
[26] Olson, L. J.; Roy, S., Theory of stochastic optimal economic growth, (Dana, R. A.; Le Van, C.; Mitra, T.; Nishimura, K., Handbook on optimal growth 1: discrete time (2005), Springer: Springer New York), 297-336
[27] Privileggi, F.; Marsiglio, S., Environmental shocks and sustainability in a basic economy-environment model, Int J Appl Nonlin Sci, 1, 67-75 (2013) · Zbl 1287.91121
[28] Solow, R., A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Q J Econ, 70, 65-94 (1956)
[29] Stenflo, O., Uniqueness of invariant measures for place-dependent random iteration of functions. fractals in multimedia, The IMA volumes in mathematics and its application book series, vol. 132, 13-32 (2002) · Zbl 1053.28004
[30] Stenflo, O., A survey of average contractive iterated function systems, J Differ Eq Appl, 18, 8, 1355-1380 (2012) · Zbl 1258.60043
[31] Tai, M. Y.; Chao, C. C.; Hu, W. W., Pollution, health and economic growth, North Am J Econ Finance, 32, 155-161 (2015)
[32] Varangis P., Varma S., dePlaa A., Nehru V.. Exogenous shocks in low income countries: economic policy issues and the role of the international community. 2004. The World Bank.
[33] van Zon, A.; Muysken, J., Health and endogenous growth, J Health Econ, 20, 169-185 (2001)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.