×

Volatility asymmetry in functional threshold GARCH model. (English) Zbl 1444.62109

The authors propose a functional threshold GARCH (fTGARCH) model and extend the news impact curve (NIC) and the cumulative impact response function (CIRF) within the functional heteroskedastic framework.
With improvements in data acquisition, functional versions of the heteroskedastic models have emerged to deal with the high-frequency observations. The model considered in the article is: \[ r_t(\tau) = \sigma_t(\tau)\epsilon(\tau), \] \[ \sigma^2(\tau) = \gamma(\tau)+\int_0^1 [\alpha^+(\tau,s)r^{+2}_{t-1}(s)+\alpha^-(\tau,s)r^{-2}_{t-1}(s)+\beta(\tau,s)\sigma^2_{t-1}(s)] ds, \] where \({r_t(\tau)}_{t=1}^n\) denotes a sequence of random curves over \(\tau\in[0,1]\) in the real Hilbert space \(L^2[0,1]\), the space of square integrable functions concerning the Lebesgue measure and inner product \((f,g)=\int_0^1 f(s)g(s)\,ds,\) any \(f,g \in L^2[0,1]\), \(\epsilon_t(\tau)\), \(t\in Z\), is a sequence of the i.i.d. random functions, and \(\alpha^+(\tau,s),\alpha^-(\tau,s)\) and \(\beta(\tau,s)\) are integral kernel functions which are elements of Hilbert space \(L^2[0,1]^2\).
In this model, the authors find that the fTGARCH model can describe the asymmetry of the observation data, which are revealed by the sample cross-correlation functions. The slope of the NIC changes with time for functional GARCH class models and the changes are asymmetrical for the fTGARCH model.
The persistent effects of volatility for the functional GARCH class models are explored by using the generalized CIRF. By fitting the models to the S&P500 stock market index, the authors conclude that the fTGARCH model has some flexibility and superiority in regard to volatility asymmetry.

MSC:

62M10 Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH)
62R10 Functional data analysis
62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
91B84 Economic time series analysis
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] AueA, HorváthL, PellattDF. 2017. Functional generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Time Series Analysis38: 3-21. · Zbl 1356.62133
[2] BollerslevT. 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics31: 307-327. · Zbl 0616.62119
[3] BougerolP, PicardN. 1992. Stationarity of GARCH processes and of some nonnegative time series. Journal of Econometrics52: 115-127. · Zbl 0746.62087
[4] CaporinM, McAleerM. 2006. Dynamic asymmetric GARCH. Journal of Financial Econometrics4: 385-412.
[5] CattellRB. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research1: 245-276.
[6] CeroveckiC, FrancqC, HormannS, ZakoïanJ‐M.2018. Functional GARCH models: quasi‐likelihood approach and its applications, MPRA Paper.
[7] DiJ, GangopadhyayA. 2015. A data‐dependent approach to modeling volatility in financial time series. Sankhya B77: 1-26. · Zbl 1312.62132
[8] EngleRF. 1982. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica50: 987-1008. · Zbl 0491.62099
[9] EngleRF. 1990. Discussion: stock market volatility and the crash of 87. Review of Financial Studies3: 103-106.
[10] EngleRF, NgVK. 1993. Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The Journal of Finance48: 1749-1778.
[11] FrancqC, ZakoïanJ‐M. 2010. GARCH Models: Structure, Statistical Inference and Financial Applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
[12] GlostenLR, JagannathanR, RunkleD. 1993. On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance48: 1779-1801.
[13] Gonzalez‐RiveraG. 1998. Smooth transition GARCH models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics3: 61-78. · Zbl 1078.91565
[14] HaugS, CzadoC. 2007. An exponential continuous‐time GARCH process. Journal of Applied Probability44: 960-976. · Zbl 1132.60308
[15] HörmannS, HorváthL, ReederR. 2013. A functional version of the ARCH model. Econometric Theory29: 267-288. · Zbl 1271.62204
[16] HorváthL, KokoszkaP. 2012. Inference for Functional Data with Applications. New York: Springer‐Verlag. · Zbl 1279.62017
[17] HwangSY, BasawaIV. 2004. Stationarity and moment structure for Box-Cox transformed threshold GARCH(1,1) processes. Statistics & Probability Letters68: 209-220. · Zbl 1075.62080
[18] HwangSY, YoonJE. 2018. Volatility for high frequency time series toward fGARCH(1,1) as a functional model. Quantitative Bio‐Science37: 73-79.
[19] NamK, PyunCS, ArizeAC. 2002. Asymmetric mean‐reversion and contrarian profits: ANST‐GARCH approach. Journal of Empirical Finance9: 563-588.
[20] NelsonDB. 1991. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica59: 347-370. · Zbl 0722.62069
[21] ZakoïanJ‐M. 1994. Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control18: 931-955. · Zbl 0875.90197
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.